A simulation-based methodology is developed for continuously tracking and analyzing the quality of product, associated cost, and time during the manufacturing process. In particular, the metal-to-metal bonding process related to the prefit stage is selected for the study, in which required mating conditions for detail parts that make up the bonded assembly are critical. Finally, the results of the model allow the optimal condition to the supply-chain network and identification of problems that affect the quality and productivity of manufactured goods in a factory on a continuous basis.
Wegman, R. F.1989. Surface preparation techniques for adhesive bonding. Park Ridge, NJ: Noyes.
2.
Cagle, C. V.1973. The handbook of adhesive bonding. New York: McGraw-Hill.
3.
Tang, K.1988. An economic model for vendor selection. Journal of Quality Technology20 (2): 81.
4.
Duffey, M. R. , and J. R. Dixon. 1993. Managing the product realization process: A model for aggregate cost and time-to-market evaluation. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications1.
5.
Buzacott, J. A. , and D. W. H. Chen. 1984. Quality modeling of assembly systems. Proceedings of the 1984 Winter Simulation Conference, p. 361.
6.
Lester, R. H. , N. L. Enrich, and H. E. Mottley. 1977. Quality control for profit. New York: Industrial Press.
7.
Pritsker, A. A. B. , and C. D. Pegden. 1979. An introduction to simulation and SLAM. New York: Halstead.
8.
Smith, R. , and L. Platt. 1988. Benefits of animation in the simulation of an assembly line. SIMULATION.
9.
Hlupic, V.1999. Discrete-event simulation software: What the users want. SIMULATION73 (6): 362.
10.
Goel, S. 2000. A simulation approach to track quality, cost and time during the manufacture of metal bonded assemblies. PhD diss., University of Manitoba.
