The success of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor screening programmes depends heavily on good uptake rates and the extent of risk factor modification following screening. It is thus important to try to understand what affects people's decision to attend a screening appointment and their motivation to change their lifestyle, if necessary, following screening. This paper summarises three studies undertaken to describe uptake of screening and risk factor modification and to identify the psychological factors involved. The studies tookplace in two settings: a worksite mobile screening service and a city health centre screening programme. The results identified a number of sociodemographic, personal and organisational factors involved in screening behaviour which offer suggestions for effective planning of screening programmes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ToonPD. Health checks in general practice. Br Med J1995; 310: 1083–1084.
2.
PyoralaK, De BackerG, GrahamI, Poole-WilsonP, WoodD. Prevention of coronary heart disease in clinical practice. Eur. Heart J.199415: 1300–31.
3.
FieldK, ThordgoodM, SilgayC, NormandC, O'NeillC, MuirJ. Strategies for coronary risk factor prevention in primary care on cardiovascular risk. Br Med J1995; 310: 1109–12.
4.
BarthJD, ArntzeniusAC, KromhoutD. Follow-up on Leiden Trial. N. Eng J Med1987; 316: 881–82.
5.
WattsGF, LewisB, BruntJNH. Effects on coronary artery disease of lipidlowering diet or diet plus cholestyramine, in the St. Thomas' Atherosclerosis Regression Study (STARS). Lancet1992; 239: 563–68.
BlankenhornDH, JohnsonRD Nessim SA, SanmarcoME, AzenSP, CashinHemphillMD. Beneficial effects of combined colistipol-niacin therapy on coronary atherosclerosis and coronary venous bypass grafts. JAMA.1987; 257: 3233–3240.
8.
BrownG, AlbersJJ, FisherLD. Regression of coronary artery disease as a result of intensive lipid lowering therapy in men with high levels of apoliprotein 6. N Eng J Med1990; 323: 1289–98.
9.
PedersenTR, KjekshusJ, BergK. Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4, 444 patients with coronary heart disease; the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Lancet1994; 344: 1383–1389.
10.
ShepherdJ, CobbeSM, FordI. Prevention of coronary heart disease with pravastin in men with hypercholesterolaemia. N Eng J Med1995; 333: 1301–1307.
11.
Tunstall-PedoeH, SmithWCS, CrombieIK. Levels and trends of coronary heart disease mortality in Scotland compared with other countries. Health Bulletin1986; 44: 153–161.
12.
Tunstall-PedoeH, SmithWCS, CrombieIK, TavendaleR. Coronary risk factor and lifestyle variation across Scotland: Results from the Scottish Heart Health Study. Scot Med J.1989; 34: 556–560.
13.
McEwanSR, McEwenJ. Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Scot Med J1989; 34: 387–88.
14.
McEwanSR, DaviesHTO, AllanE, MacleanD, ForbesCD. Measurement and management of cardiovascular risk factors — Is screening worthwhile?Scot Med J1993; 38: 173–77.
15.
MuirJ, LancasterT, JonesL, Yudkin P for the Imperial Cancer Research Fund Oxcheck Study Group. Effectiveness of health checks conducted by nurses in primary care: Final results of the OXCHECK Study. Br Med J1995; 310: 1099–1104.
16.
McEwanSR, ArthurP, ShamssainMH. Heart and arterial disease risk factor levels in the Scottish workforce: Cross-sectional study of risk factor levels. Scot Med J1995; 40: 43–49.
17.
OXCHECK Study Group. Effectiveness of health checks conducted by nurses in primary care: Results of the OXCHECK study after one year. Br Med J1994; 308: 308–12.
18.
Family Heart Study Group (FHS)Randomised controlled trial evaluating cardiovascular screening and intervention in general practice: Principal results of British family heart study. Br Med J, 1994; 308: 313–20.
19.
BarrattA, ReznikR, IrwigL, CuffA, SimpsonJM, OldenburgB, HorvathJ, SullivanD. Work-site cholesterol screening and dietary intervention: The staff healthy heart project. American Journal of Public Health, 1994; 84 (5): 779–82.
20.
GomelM, OldenburgB, SimpsonJ. & OwenN. Work-site cardiovascular risk reduction: A randomized trial of health risk assessment, education, counselling and incentives. American Journal of Public Health, 1993; 83 (9): 1231–38.
21.
KlesgesRC, CigrangJ. & GlasgowRE. Worksite smoking modification programs: A state of the art review and directions for future research. In MarteauTM & JohnstonM. (Eds) Applications in health psychology, 1989. New Brunswick; New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
22.
McEwanSR & McEwenJ. Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Scot Med J1989; 34: 387–88.
23.
JanzNK. & Becker MH The Health belief model: A decade later. Health Education Quarterly, 1984; 11 (1): 1–47.
24.
FishbeinM. & AjzenI. Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: an introduction to theory and research. 1975; Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
25.
AjzenI. Attitudes, Personality and Behaviour. 1988. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
26.
PillR, FrenchJ, HardingK. & StottN. Invitation to attend a health check in a general practice setting: Comparison of attenders and non-attenders. J R Coll Gen Pract, 1988; 38: 53–56.
27.
PillR. & StottN. Invitation to attend a health check in a general practice setting: The views of a cohort of non-attenders. J R Coll Gen Pract, 1988; 38: 57–60.
28.
MeadowsJ, JenkinsonS, CatalanJ. & GazzardB. Voluntary HIV testing in the antenatal clinic: Differing uptake rates for individual counselling midwives. AIDS Care, 1990; 2: 229–33.
29.
BekkerH, ModellM, DennissG, SilverA, MatthewC, BobrowM, MarteauT. Uptake ofcystic fibrosis testing in primary care: Supply push or demand pull?Br Med J1993; 306: 1584–86.
30.
SchwarzerR. Self-efficacy in the adoption and maintenance of health behaviours: Theoretical approaches and a new model. In SchwarzerR. (Ed.), Self-Efficacy: Thought control of action. 1992Washington DC: Hemisphere.
31.
ProchaskaJ. & DiClementeC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: Towards an integrated model of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1983; 51: 390–95.
32.
ConnerM. & NormanP. Comparing the health belief model and the theory of planned behaviour in health screening. In RutterD.R. (Ed.) The Social Psychology of Health and Safety: European Perspectives. 1993. Aldershot: Avebury.
33.
ConnerM. & NormanP. The role of social cognition models in predicting attendance at health checks. Psychology & Health, 1993; 8: 447–62.
34.
NormanP. Predicting the uptake of health checks in general practice: Invitation methods and patients' health beliefs. Soc Sci Med, 1993; 37: 53–59.
35.
SeydalE, TaalE. & WiegmanO. Risk-appraisal, outcome and self-efficacy expectancies: Cognitive factors in preventive behaviour related to cancer. Psychology and Health, 1990; 4: 99–109.
36.
MarteauTM. Health-related screening: Psychological predictors of uptake and impact. In MaesS., LeventhalH & JohnstonM. (eds.). 1993. International Review of Health Psychology. John Wiley and Sons.
37.
RitchieLD. Computers in primary care. 1984. London: Heinemann.
38.
CalnanM, CantS, WilliamsS. & KilloranA. Involvement of the Primary Health Care Team in Coronary Heart Disease Prevention. Br J Gen Pract, 1994; 44: 224–28.
39.
MannJI, LewisB, ShepherdJ, Blood lipid concentrations and other cardiovascular risk factors: Distribution, prevalence and detection in Britain. Br Med J, 1988; 296: 1702–1706.
