The implementation of circulated guidelines has been audited, by assessing the extent to which nutritional goals were set and achieved and recording the levels of morbidity as a result of complications. Adults receiving artificial nutritional support were studied over a six month period. Nutritional assessment was used to determine adequacy of prescription and efficacy of the support. Energy requirements were retrospectively calculated and compared with prescriptions and actual intakes. Complications and interruptions to the regimens which resulted in lost feeding time were recorded, as were patient outcomes. Nutrient prescriptions were inadequate, delivery of prescriptions was incomplete and thus nutrient supply inadequate.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
McWhirterJP, PenningtonCR. The incidence and recognition of malnutrition in hospital. BMJ1994; 308: 945–948.
2.
BastowMD, RawlingsJ, AllisonSP. Benefits of supplementary tube feeding after fractured neck of femur: A controlled trial. BMJ1983; 287: 158992.
3.
DelmiMRapinC-HBengoaJ-M. Dietary supplementation in elderly patients with fractured neck of femur. Lancet1990; 335: 1013–6.
4.
LarssonJ, UnossonMEkA-C. Effect of dietary supplementation on nutritional status and clinical outcome in 501 geriatric patients — a randomised study. Clin Nutr1990; 9: 179–84.
5.
Lennard-JonesJE, ed. King's Fund Report. A positive approach to nutrition as a treatment. King's Fund Centre, 126 Albert St., London. NW1 7NF.1992.
6.
JamesJJ Payne, de GaraC, GrimbleG. Artificial nutrition support in hospitals in the United Kingdom — 1991: Second National Survey. Clin Nutr1992;11: 187–192.
7.
Payne-JamesJJ. Nutritional support in hospital in the United Kingdom: National Survey 1988. Health Trends1990;22: 9–13.
8.
RobertsonS. How much ofthe prescribed volume ofenteral feed does the hospitalised patients actually receive?J Hum Nutr Diet1990; 3: 165–170.
9.
TaylorSJ. Audit of nasogastric feeding practice at two acute hospitals: Is early enteral feeding associated with reduced mortality and hospital stay?J Hum Nutr Diet1993; 6: 477–489.
10.
ParkRHR, AllisonMC, LangJ. Randomised comparison of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and nasogastric tube feeding in patients with persisting neurological dysphagia. BMJ1992; 304: 1406–1409.
11.
WalkerA, BryceD, ShearerJL, CarterNW. CRAFT — an aid to medical audit, research and patient management. Health Bull (Edin)1988; 1: 42–54.
12.
ChumleaWC, RocheAF, SteinbaughML. Estimating stature form knee height for persons 60 to 90 years of age. J Am Geriatr Soc1985a; 33: 116120.
13.
BishopCW, BowenPE, RitcheySJ. Norms for nutritional assessment of American adults by upper arm anthropometry. Am J Clin Nutr1981; 34: 25302539.
14.
BurrML, PhillipsKM. Anthropometric norms in the elderly. Br J Clin Nutr1984; 51: 165–169.
15.
HeymsfieldSB, McManusC, SmithJ, StevensV, NixonDW. Anthropometric measurement of muscle mass: Revised equations for calculating bone free arm muscle area. Am J Clin Nutr1982; 36: 680–690.
16.
SchofieldWN. Predicting basal metabolic rate, new standards and review of previous work. ClinNutr1985; 39CSuppl 1.5:41.
17.
AllisonSP. The uses and limitations of nutritional support. Clin Nutr1992;319–330.
18.
CamposACL, MeguidMM. A critical appraisal of the usefulness of perioperative nutritional support. Am J Clin Nutr1992; 53: 117–130.
19.
BozettiF. Nutritional support in the adult cancer patient. Clin Nutr1992; 11: 167–179.
20.
HillGL. Some implications of body composition research for modern clinical management. Infusiontherapie1990; 17: 79–80.
21.
JohnstonDA, RichardsJ, PenningtonCR. Auditing the effect of experience and change on home parenteral nutrition related complications. Clin Nutr1994; 13: 341–344.
