Although caesarean section is probably one of the oldest operations in the history of medicine, its origins are rather obscure. Very few surgical procedures have been the subject of such bitter controversy, and, it is only in relatively recent times that its performance changed from a last minute attempt to save a child from an almost dead mother to a safe, of ten planned, operation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
PlacekPJTaffelSMMoienMS. 1986 c-sections rise; VBAC'S inch upward. Am J Pub Health, 1988; 7; 562–3.
2.
Information and DivisionStatistics. Hospital and Health Board comparisons in obstetrics — 1985–1987. Edinburgh: Common Services Agency, 1989.
3.
BrianVA. The deepest cut of all. Nursing Mirror, 1976; 143; 68–9.
4.
YoungJH. Cesarean Section: the history and development of the operation from earliest times. London: HK Lewis & Co Ltd, 1944.
5.
RosenMG. Caesarean Childbirth: report of a consensus development conference. Bethesda Maryland: National Institute of Health, 1981. Nill Publication no. 82–2067.
6.
HarrisRP. Cattle-horn lacerations of the abdomen and uterus in pregnant women. Am J Obstet (NY), 1887; 11: 673–85.
7.
HarrisRP. Remarks on the cesarean operation. Am J Obstet (NY), 1879; 11: 620–6.
8.
RadcliffeW. Milestones in Midwifery. Bristol: John Wright and Sons Ltd, 1967.
9.
GreenGH. A Tudor Caesarean section. Surgery, Gynecol and Obstet, 1985; 161: 490–6.
10.
McLintockAH (ed). Smellie's Treatise on the Theory and Practice of Midwifery: Vol III. London: New Sydenham Society, 1876, 230–5.
11.
HellmanLM. Three deliveries that changed the history of the world. JAOA, 1974; 73: 93–108.
12.
WiliocksJCalderAA. The Glasgow Royal Maternity Hospital 1834–1984 150 years of service in a changing obstetric world. Scot Med J, 1985; 30: 247–54.
13.
DowDA. The Rottenrow. Lancs: The Parthenon Press Ltd, 1984.
14.
CameronM. The caesarean section: With notes of a successful case. Br Med J, 1889; Jan 26th: 180–3.
15.
CameronM. Remarks on caesarean section, with notes of a second successful case. Br Med J, 1890; March 15th: 583–5.