One hundred and thirty four cases are presented in which polyglycolic acid (P.G.A.) sutures were used. In 34 cases the suture was inserted into the various layers of the abdominal wall and in 100 it was used in a variety of anastomoses involving the gastro-intestinal tract. In the light of our experience we feel that this suture is highly satisfactory in these situations, in addition to possessing physical properties which make it superior to catgut.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnscombeA. R., HiraN., HuntB. (1970). The use of a new absorbable suture material (polyglycolic acid) in general surgery. British Journal of Surgery, 57, 917
2.
Davis & Geck (1971). The proceedings of a symposium on Polyglycolic Acid Sutures
3.
EcheverriaA. E. (1970). American Journal of Surgery
4.
EcheverriaE., JimenezJ. (1970). Evaluation of an absorbable synthetic suture. Surgery, Gynecology and Obstetrics, 131, 1
5.
HaxtonH. (1963). The absorption of catgut in human abdominal wounds. British Journal of Surgery, 50, 534
6.
HaxtonH. (1965). The influence of suture materials and methods on the healing of abdominal wounds. British Journal of Surgery, 52, 372
7.
JenkinsH. P. (1937). A clinical study of catgut in relation to abdominal wound disruption. Surgery, Gynecology and Obstetrics, 64, 648
8.
LargeO. P. (1943). Comparison of tissue reactions from new sutures. American Journal of Surgery, 60, 415
9.
LocalioS. A., CasaleW., HintonJ. W. (1943). Wound healing—experimental and statistical study. III. Experimental observations. Surgery, Gynecology and Obstetrics, 77, 243
10.
NauntonMorgan M., (1969). New synthetic absorbable suture material. British Medical Journal, 2, 308
