Abstract
Background
Effective communication and shared decision-making are essential for optimising urological care, making informed decisions, and improving patient outcomes. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in urology has the potential to act as a supportive tool in this process. This review aims to evaluate how AI-based tools support and enhance patient-provider communication and shared decision-making within urological care.
Methods
Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a systematic search was performed using Cochrane, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Scopus for literature published between 2019 and 2024. Search terms included ‘Artificial Intelligence’, ‘Urology’, ‘Shared Decision-Making’, and ‘Communication’. Studies were screened using our predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Three primary themes were identified, through which the studies were analysed.
Results
Of 807 identified studies, 14 were appropriate for inclusion. Only 14 studies met criteria because most excluded articles did not evaluate AI tools designed for communication, health literacy, or shared decision-making. AI-driven tools, particularly large language models (LLMs), show the potential to reduce knowledge gaps for diverse literacy levels and improve patient comprehension. These aids may improve the readability of complex medical content and translate information with cultural sensitivity. AI may also enhance communication between patients and healthcare providers by automating repetitive tasks, such as responding to frequently asked questions. However, AI has limitations, with different LLMs displaying variable levels of effectiveness and accuracy across urological conditions.
Conclusions
The integration of AI has the potential to enhance communication and promote shared decision-making in urology. However, patients should use AI as a complement to physicians rather than a replacement. To confidently determine their role and ensure AI output accuracy, further studies, including validation against clinical standards and real-world accuracy are required.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
