GanHLanJBeiH,et al.The impact of sarcopenia on prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Scott Med J2023: 369330231187655. DOI: 10.1177/00369330231187655.
2.
GuoSLiuH. Admission on weekends does not increase mortality after hip fracture: A meta-analysis of 1.4 million patients. Scott Med J2023: 369330231186433. DOI: 10.1177/00369330231186433.
3.
SunHLvQLiuT, et al.Diagnostic accuracy of cervical elastography for predicting preterm delivery: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Scott Med J2023: 369330231178910. DOI: 10.1177/00369330231178910.
4.
LiuPCaoFYaoQ, et al.Effectiveness of educational and training intervention for improving hand hygiene compliance amongst nurses: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Scott Med J2023: 369330231178909. DOI: 10.1177/00369330231178909.
5.
PanHFeiG. Erector spinae plane block for pain control after hip surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scott Med J2023. in press.
6.
XiongHShiL. Effect of weekend admission on mortality risk in patients with sepsis and septic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Scott Med J2023. DOI: 10.1177/00369330231189887.
7.
GaoLZhanYHuX, et al.Platelet-lymphocyte ratio and lymphocyte-monocyte ratio in inflammatory bowel disease and disease activity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Scott Med J2023. DOI: 10.1177/00369330231188962.
8.
JiFZhouX. Effect of prehospital intubation on mortality rates in patients with traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Scott Med J2023. DOI: 10.1177/00369330231189886.
9.
GopalakrishnanSGaneshkumarP. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: Understanding the best evidence in primary healthcare. J Family Med Prim Care2013; 2: 9–14.
10.
PageMJMcKenzieJEBossuytPM, et al.The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Br Med J2021; 372: 71.
11.
SchiavoJH. PROSPERO: An international register of systematic review protocols. Med Ref Serv Q2019; 38: 171–180.
12.
DehkordiAHMazaheriEIbrahimHA, et al.How to write a systematic review: A narrative review. Int J Prev Med2021; 12: 27.
13.
EriksenMBFrandsenTF. The impact of patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) as a search strategy tool on literature search quality: A systematic review. J Med Libr Assoc2018; 106: 420–431.
14.
TawfikGMDilaKASMohamedMYF, et al.A step by step guide for conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis with simulation data. Trop Med Health2019; 47: 46.
15.
MollerAMMylesPS. What makes a good systematic review and meta-analysis?Br J Anaesth2016; 117: 428–430.
16.
DettoriJRNorvellDCChapmanJR. Seeing the forest by looking at the trees: How to interpret a meta-analysis forest plot. Global Spine J2021; 11: 614–616.
17.
SedgwickP. Meta-analyses: heterogeneity and subgroup analysis. Br Med J2013; 346: f4040.
18.
BakerWLWhiteCMCappelleriJC, et al.Understanding heterogeneity in meta-analysis: the role of meta-regression. Int J Clin Pract2009; 63: 1426–1434.
19.
MathurMBVanderWeeleTJ. Robust metrics and sensitivity analyses for meta-analyses of heterogeneous effects. Epidemiology2020; 31: 356–358.
20.
SheaBJReevesBCWellsG, et al.AMSTAR 2: A critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. Br Med J2017; 358: j4008.
