JacksonA. The impact factor game: the rising impact factor of the British Journal of Radiology – a success story?Br J Radiol2010; 83: 93–97.
11.
HirschJE. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. PNAS USA2005; 102: 16569–16572.
12.
EnserinkM. Transgenic food debate. The Lancet scolded over Pusztai paper. Science1999; 286: 656–656.
13.
EwenSWBPusztaiA. Effect of diets containing genetically modified potatoes expressing Galanthus nivalis lectin on rat small intestine. Lancet1999; 354: 1353–1354.
HamiltonD. The Scottish Medical Journal – the first fifty years. SMJ2006; 50: 8–12.
17.
MurieJ. Medical case reports: a modern tradition. SMJ2010; 55: 2–3.
18.
GoodhartCAE. Monetary theory and practice. The UK experience, London: Macmillan, 1984.
19.
Bevan G and Hood C. What's measured is what matters: targets and gaming in the English Public Health Care System. The Public Services Programme – quality, performance and delivery. Discussion paper series: No. 501. Swindon, UK: Economic and Social Research Council, 2005.
20.
StrathernM. ‘Improving Ratings’: audit in the British University System. Eur Rev1997; 5: 305–321.
21.
Jary D. Aspects of the ‘Audit Society’: issues arising from the colonisation of professional academic identities by a ‘portable management tool’. In: Dent M and Whitehead S (eds) Managing professional identities: knowledge, performativity and the ‘new’ professional. London: Routledge, 2002, Chapter 3, pp. 38–60.
22.
Audit Commission, United Kingdom. Waiting list accuracy, London: HMSO, 2003.
23.
HoodC. Gaming in targetworld: the targets approach to managing British public services. Public Admin Rev2006; 66: 515–521.
24.
BuchananDAStoreyJ. Don't stop the clock: manipulating hospital waiting-lists. J Health Org Manage2009; 24: 343–360.