Oral fluid testing as an alternative to urine testing for drugs of abuse in inpatient forensic settings: giving patients choice

Abstract

Background and aims

The abuse of illicit substances is very common amongst forensic psychiatry populations and is known to be one of the most potent risk factors for interpersonal violence. Forensic psychiatry units hence strive to keep themselves as free as possible from illicit substances and in Scotland drugs of abuse have traditionally been screened for by means of urine testing. The aim of this study is to examine patients’ preferences for drug testing methods and to compare the acceptability of urine testing versus oral fluid testing (OFT) within a secure hospital setting.

Methods

Patients in three continuing care wards at the State Hospital, Carstairs were offered the choice of either urine or oral fluid testing. We developed protocols and recording forms and trained staff in the administration of the OFT. We recorded the sampling time for OFT and urine, and the views of patients and staff on the testing procedures over a six month period.

Results

Sixty-two samples were taken, with 53 (85%) opting for OFT and nine (15%) opting for urine sampling. The average time taken for OFT was 13 minutes, while the average time taken for urine sampling was 33 minutes. The majority of patients and staff rated oral fluid and urine testing as comfortable and easy. Patients recorded comments on 46 (87%) of OFT samples, only two of which were negative. In general they preferred the OFT because it was quicker and easier and they commented on it being more dignified and private. Patients recorded comments on five (55%) of urine samples, with one of the primary reasons for opting for urine sampling appearing to be a reluctance to try new things, though a few said they did not want to have anything in their mouths. Staff returned comments on 24 (45%) of OFT samples and one (11%) of urine samples. Comments on the OFT were overwhelmingly positive and pointed out the relative speed and ease of this sampling method.

Conclusions

We concluded that the pilot study was successful. OFT was found to be generally preferred by patients and staff. Although there was an additional financial cost, this was considered to be outweighed by the significant benefits arising from offering patients choice, the preservation of patient dignity and staff time savings. The option of OFT has now been extended to all patients within the State Hospital. Practitioners will wish to consider the value of OFT in forensic psychiatry inpatient settings given the benefits identified within this study.

Keywords

Drugs of abuse oral fluid testing urine testing forensic inpatient settings

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Swanson

Holzer

Ganju

. Violence and psychiatric disorder in the community: Evidence from the epidemiological catchment area surveys. Hosp Community Psychiatry 1990; 41: 761–770.

Monahan

Steadman

Silver

. Rethinking risk assessment: The McArthur study of mental disorder and violence, New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.

Jablensky

Sartorius

Emberg

. Schizophrenia: Manifestations, incidence and course in different cultures. Psychol Med 1992; 20: 79–79.

Cantwell

Harrison

. Substance misuse in the severely mentally ill. Adv Psychiatr Treat 1996; 2: 117–124.

Taylor

Leese

Williams

. Mental disorder and violence: A special (high security) hospital study. Br J Psychiatr 1998; 172: 218–226.

D’Silva

Ferriter

. Substance use by the mentally disordered committing serious offences – a high security hospital study. J Forensic Psychiatr Psychol 2003; 14: 178–193.

Scott

Whyte

Burnett

. A national survey of substance misuse and treatment outcome in psychiatric patients in medium security. J Forensic Psychiatr Psychol 2004; 15: 595–605.

Thomson

Bogue

Humphreys

. The State Hospital survey: A description of psychiatric patients in conditions of special security in Scotland. J Forensic Psychiatr 1997; 8: 263–284.

Ritchie

Billcliff

McMahon

. The detection and treatment of substance abuse in offenders with mental illness: An intervention study. Med Sci Law 2004; 44(4): 317–326.

10.

MacIntyre

McNamara

Irwin

. Substance misuse in a high security hospital: Three years of urine drug testing at the State Hospital, Carstairs. J Forensic Psychiatr Psychol 2004; 15(4): 606–619.

11.

Dolan

Kirwan

. Survey of staff perceptions of illicit drug use among patients in a medium secure unit. Psychiatr Bull 2001; 25: 14–17.

12.

Durant

Lelliott

Coyle

. Availability of treatment for substance misuse in medium secure psychiatric care in England: A national survey. J Forensic Psychiatr Psychol 2006; 17(4): 611–625.

13.

Kendrick

Basson

Taylor

. Substance misuse in a high security hospital: Period prevalence and an evaluation of screening. Crim Behav Ment Health 2002; 12: 123–134.

14.

Crouch

Walsh

Flegel

. An evaluation of selected oral fluid point-of-collection drug-testing devices. J Anal Toxicol 2005; 29(4): 244–248.

15.

Flanagan RJ, Taylor A, Watson ID, et al. Toxicology testing at the point of care. In: Fundamentals of analytical toxicology. Chapter 13. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2007, pp. 339–352.

16.

Kadehjian

. Legal issues in oral fluid testing. Forensic Sci Int 2005; 150: 151–160.

17.

George

Braithwaite

. An investigation into the extent of possible dilution of samples for urinary drugs of abuse screening. Addiction 1995; 90: 967–990.