Abstract
Information on the distribution of mortality and morbidity in general practice is scarce, and not easily accessible either by health authorities or individual general practices. Although the assessment of population mortality is a standard public health measure, colleagues in public health, information sciences and general practice rarely undertake such activity related to general practice populations. Mortality information can be used for various purposes. Examples are providing background data for clinical audits or alerting practitioners to quality issues in the healthcare industry or even suggesting environmental hazards. We measured the experience of mortality in all generally practices in Grampian in the years 1991 to 1999. All practices were notified of their actual and expected mortality over this period of time and asked for comment. Only three general practices had excess mortality experience in both the periods 1991 to 1995 and 1996 to 1999. Only a minority of practices commented on the results. It appears that a high presence of nursing homes in a practice might skew the results; this phenomenon will be central to further inquiry. Future methodology for recording death in general practice should take account of this, as well as providing an account of the qualitative aspects of patients' need for a dignified, satisfactory death.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.