After speculation that the dialectic is as yet unrealized, a kind of “unfinished project,” three areas in which the dialectic remains alive are oudined: 1) in reflexivity, in which the theory of ideology demands to be confronted with the contemporary theory and experience of “multiple subject positions”; 2) in historiography, in which the dialectic is not a philosophical position but a critical operation performed on traditional historical narrative; and, finally, 3) in contradiction, a structure the dialectic does not posit, but causes to emerge and to become visible in familiar and seemingly unproblematical situations (Brecht's “estrangement effect”).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aristotle.1985. Metaphysics. In Complete Works, Volume II. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
2.
BarthesRoland1957. Mythologies. Paris: Seuil.
3.
BarthesRoland1970. S/Z. Paris: Seuil.
4.
DerridaJacques1994. Le Problime de la génése dans la philosophie do HusserLParis: PUF.
5.
GramsciAntonio1949. Pre-Prison Writings, ed. MellamyR., trans. V. Cox. London: Cambridge University Press.
6.
HegelG. W. F.1977. Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. A. V. Miller. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
7.
JamesonFrederic1994. The Seeds of Time. New York: Columbia University Press.
8.
JamesonFrederic1998. Brecht and Method. London: Verso.
9.
LukácsGeorg1971. History and Class Consciousness, trans. Rodney Livingston. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
10.
MarxKarl1986. Grundrisse. In MarxKarl and EngelsFriedrich, Collected Works, Vols. 28-29. New York: International Publishers.
11.
MarxKarl and EngelsFredrich1976. The Communist Manifesto. MECW, Vol. VI.Moscow: Progress Publishers.
12.
OilmanBertell1993. Dialectical Investigations. New York: Routledge.
13.
PietzWilliam1985. “The Problem of the Fetish.” Res, 9 (Spring).
14.
SmithTony1990. The Logic of Marx's CapitalNew York: SUNY Press.
15.
ŽižekSlavoj1989. The Sublime Object of Ideology. London.
