In the 70s, Marxist-feminist currents defined gender through the division of labor that relegated women to the home and made their work unwaged. However, the assignment of domestic tasks to women remains a more complex process than it has been made out to be. By opening the scopes from the Marxist feminist debates around gender, this study aims to define the gender category through concepts developed in the critique of political economy and its study of the capitalist social relation. Through this insight, I argue that during the first two centuries of capitalism the necessities for the establishment of the family institution and the figure of the free individual laborer were resolved through a specific division of labor that created a relation of domination within the family household, which was reified as the category of gender. By understanding how the dynamics of the capitalist mode of production give way to the division of labor, this study attempts to revitalize the Marxist debate on gender and relate it to the cycle of capitalist production.
ArruzzaC.BhattacharyaT.FraserN.. 2019. Feminism for the 99 Percent: A Manifesto. Verso.
2.
BelliottiR. A.1988. “Marxism, Feminism, and Surrogate Motherhood.” Social Theory and Practice14 (3): 389–417.
3.
BestB.2021. “Wages for Housework Redux: Social Reproduction and the Utopian Dialectic of the Value-form.” College Literature24 (4): 896–921.
4.
BhattacharyaT.2017. “How Not to Skip Class: Social Reproduction of Labor and the Global Working Class.” In Social Reproduction Theory: Remapping Class, Recentering Oppression, edited by BhattacharyaT., 68–93. Pluto Press.
5.
BohrerA.2018. “Intersectionality and Marxism: a Critical Historiography.” Historical Materialism26 (2): 46–74. doi: 10.1163/1569206X-00001617.
6.
BrysonV.2004. “Marxism and Feminism: Can the “Unhappy Marriage” Be Saved?” Journal of Political Ideologies9 (1): 13–30. doi: 10.1080/1356931032000167454.
7.
CarrE. H.1979. The Russian Revolution: From Lenin to Stalin; (1917-1929). Macmillan.
8.
CockburnC.1977. “The Local State: Management of Cities and People.” Race & Class18 (4): 363–76. doi: 10.1177/030639687701800403.
9.
CooperM.2019. Family Values: Between Neoliberalism and the New Social Conservatism. Princeton University Press.
10.
Dalla CostaM.1975. “A General Strike.” In All Work and No Pay: Women, Housework, and the Wages due, edited by EdmondW.SuzieF., 125–27. Falling Wall Press.
11.
Dalla CostaM.JamesS.. 1975. The Power of Women and the Subversion of the Community. Falling Wall Press.
DeakinS.2001. “The Contract of Employment: a Study in Legal Evolution.” Historical Studies in Industrial Relations11: 1–36. doi: 10.3828/HSIR.2001.11.1.
15.
DeakinS.2016. “Formation of the Contract of Employment.” In The Contract of Employment, edited by FreedlandM.BoggA.CabrelliD., et al.Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198783169.003.0018.
16.
DelphyC.1980. “The Main Enemy.” Feminist Issues1 (1): 23–40. doi: 10.1007/BF02685557.
17.
DelphyC.1993. “Rethinking Sex and Gender.” Women’s Studies International Forum16 (1): 1–9. doi: 10.1016/0277-5395(93)90076-L.
18.
De’AthA. S.2018. “Reproduction.” In The Bloomsbury Companion to Marx. 1st ed., 395–405. Bloomsbury Publishing.
19.
DixonM.1977a. “The Rise and Demise of Women’s Liberation: a Class Analysis.” Synthesis2 (1/2): 21–38.
20.
DixonM.1977b. “The Subjugation of Women Under Capitalism: the Bourgeois Morality.” Synthesis1 (4): 18–30.
21.
D’EmilioJ.1983. “Capitalism and Gay Identity.” In Powers of Desire: The Politics of Sexuality, 100–14. NYU Press.
22.
EllermanD. P.1986. “The Employment Contract and Liberal Thought.” Review of Social Economy44 (1): 13–39. doi: 10.1080/758537480.
23.
EngelsF.2010. The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State. 1st ed.Penguin Books.
24.
FarnsworthE. A.1969. “The past of Promise: an Historical Introduction to Contract.” Columbia Law Review69 (4): 576–607. doi: 10.2307/1121118.
25.
FedericiS.1975. Wages Against Housework. Falling Wall Press.
26.
FedericiS.2004. Caliban and the Witch: Women, the Body and Primitive Accumulation. Autonomedia.
27.
FedericiS.2020. Beyond the Periphery of the Skin: Rethinking, Remaking, and Reclaiming the Body in Contemporary Capitalism. PM Press.
28.
FergusonS.2020. Women and Work: Feminism, Labour, and Social Reproduction. Pluto Press. doi: 10.2307/j.ctvs09qm0.
29.
GilchristR.1999. “‘Gendered Hierarchies? Labour, ‘Prestige’ and Production’.” In Gender and Archaeology, 23–25. Routledge.
30.
GoldinC.2014. “A Grand Gender Convergence: Its Last Chapter.” The American Economic Review104 (4): 1091–119. doi: 10.1257/aer.104.4.1091.
31.
HartmannH. I.1995. “The Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism: towards a More Progressive Union.” In LippitVictor D. (ed.). Radical Political Economy, 165–197. Routledge.
HegelG. W. F.1975. Lectures on the Philosophy of World History. Translated by Hugh Barr Nisbet. Cambridge Studies in the History and Theory of Politics. Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139167567.
34.
HolmstromN.1981. ““Women’s Work,” the Family and Capitalism.” Science & Society: A Journal of Marxist Thought and Analysis45 (2): 186–211.
35.
HopkinsE.1982. “Working Hours and Conditions During the Industrial Revolution: a Re-Appraisal.” The Economic History Review35 (1): 52–66. doi: 10.2307/2595103.
36.
HubermanM.2004. “Working Hours of the World Unite? New International Evidence of Worktime, 1870-1913.” The Journal of Economic History64 (4): 964–1001. doi: 10.1017/S0022050704043050.
Iñigo CarreraJ.2007. Conocer El Capital Hoy: Usar Críticamente El Capital, Vol. 1. Editorial Imago Mundi.
40.
JacksonS.1999. “Marxism and Feminism.” In Marxism and Social Science, edited by GambleA.MarshD.TantT., 11–34. Macmillan Education UK. doi: 10.1007/978-1-349-27456-7_2.
41.
JamesS.LopezN.RedikerM.. 2012. Sex, Race and class-the Perspective of Winning: A Selection of Writings 1952-2011. PM Press.
42.
JonesP.1989. “The Ideal of the Neutral State.” In GoodinRobert E.ReeveAndrew (eds.). Liberal Neutrality, 9–39. Routledge.
43.
KhorasaniD. G.LeeS.-H.. 2024. “Demystifying the Sexual Division of Labor: a Look from Human Evolution.” In GellerPamela L. (ed.). The Routledge Handbook of Feminist Anthropology, 171–185. Routledge.
44.
KollontaiA.2009. La Mujer Nueva Y La Moral Sexual. Casa Juan Pablos.
45.
LangeE. L.2021. “Gendercraft: Marxism–Feminism, Reproduction, and the Blind Spot of Money.” Science & Society: A Journal of Marxist Thought and Analysis85 (1): 38–65. doi: 10.1521/siso.2021.85.1.38.
46.
LaqueurT.1993. “Sex and Desire in the Industrial Revolution.” In The Industrial Revolution and British Society, edited by O’BrienP.QuinaultR., 100–23. Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511622137.006.
47.
LeninV. I.2020. The State and Revolution. Foreign Languages Press.
48.
MarxK.1990. Capital, Vol. I. Penguin Books.
49.
MarxK.1993. Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy. Penguin Books.
50.
MarxK.EngelsF.. 2014. The Communist Manifesto. Penguin Pocket Hardbacks. Penguin Books.
51.
MeeceJ. L.2006. “Trends in Women’s Employment in the Early 21st Century.” Educational Research and Evaluation12 (4): 297–303. doi: 10.1080/13803610600765539.
PenistonW.2004. Pederasts and Others: Urban Culture and Sexual Identity in Nineteenth-Century Paris. Routledge.
56.
PlaceF.1972. The Autobiography of Francis Place (1771-1854). Cambridge University Press.
57.
RappR.1978. “Family and Class in Contemporary America: Notes Toward an Understanding of Ideology.” Science & Society: A Journal of Marxist Thought and Analysis42 (3): 278–300.
58.
ScottJ. W.TillyL. A.. 1975. “Women’s Work and the Family in Nineteenth-Century Europe.” Comparative Studies in Society and History17 (1): 36–64.
59.
VogelL.1983. Marxism and the Oppression of Women: Toward a Unitary Theory. Rutgers University Press.
60.
WeissH.2022. “Social Reproduction as the Reproduction of Capitalism.” Focaal93: 105–11. doi: 10.3167/fcl.2022.930108.
61.
WilsonE.1977. Women and the Welfare State. 1st ed.Routledge.
62.
WoolfV.1995. Killing the Angel in the House: Seven Essays. Penguin 60s. Penguin Books.
63.
ZetkinC.1976. La Cuestión Femenina Y La Lucha Contra El Reformismo. Anagrama.
