A Consideration of the Results of the Pancreatic (Cammidge) Reaction in 1,475 Cases

Agabekoff . “The Reaction of Cammidge in Diseases of the Pancreas,” Russk. Vrach., 1907, vi, pp. 1175 and 1211.

Barker . “Pancreatitis,” Med. Record. New York, 1908, lxxiv, p. 875.

Brown . Journ. Amer. Med. Assoc. Chicago, 1909, lii, p. 1874.

Bühlig . “The Cammidge Reaction in the Urine,” Quarterly Eull. of the North-Western Med. School, June, 1909.

Cammidge . “The Chemistry of the Urine in Diseases of the Pancreas,” Lancet, 1904, i, pp. 782, 1459, 1750; 1904, ii, p. 329. Brit. Med. Journ. 1904, ii, pp. 43, 152; 1906, i, p. 594; 1908, i, p. 959. The Reaction of Phenylhydrazin with other Substances than Dextrose occurring in the Urine,” Lancet, 1905, ii, p. 14. “An Improved Method of performing the Pancreatic Reaction in the Urine,” Brit. Med. Journ. 1906, i, p. 1150. “The Technique of the Examination of the Urine and Fæeces in Suspected Cases of Disease of the Pancreas,” Surg. Gyn. and Obstet. Chicago, 1906, iii, p. 440. “The so-called Pancreatic Reaction in the Urine,” Edinb. Med. Journ. 1907, lxiii, p. 129. “Affections of the Pancreas,” Clin. Journ. 1907, xxix, p. 398. “Acute Pancreatitis,” Brit. Med. Journ. 1907, ii, p. 1133. “Pancreatic Diabetes,” Surg. Gyn. and Obstet. Chicago, 1908, vi, p. 22. “The Pancreatic Reaction in the Urine and the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Diseases,” Clin. Journ. 1908, xxxi, p. 392. “Pancreatic Glycosuria ten years after Typhoid Fever,” Lancet, 1909, i, p. 1739. “Observations on the Urine in Chronic Disease of the Pancreas,” Proc. Roy. Soc. 1909, B, lxxxi, p. 372. “The Pancreas: Its Surgery and Pathology,” 1908. “An Experimental Investigation into the Causes of the Pancreatic Reaction,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. 1910, iii (Path. Sect.), p. 79.

Cartier . “Reaction de Cammidge,” Thèse de Par., 1909.

Cassidy . St. Thomas's Hosp. Reports, 1905, xxxiv, p. 623.

Cowie Roch Cooke . Physician and Surgeon. Detroit, 1905, xxvii, p. 156.

Decker . “The Pancreatic Reaction (Cammidge test) of the Urine,” Bull. State Univ. Iowa, i (new series), March, 1908.

Dieulafoy . Presse Méd. Par., 1907, xv, p. 657.

Edsall . “Progressive Medicine,” 1909.

Eichler . “Experiment. Beitrage zur Diagnose der Pankreaskrank. Die Cammidge'sche Pankreasreaktion im Urin,” Berl. klin. Wochenschr., 1907, xliv, p. 769.

Eichler Schirokauer . “Zur Diagnose der Pankreaskrank. Die Cammidge'sche Reaktion,” Berl. klin. Wochenschr., 1909, xlvi, p. 285.

Ellenbeck . Biochem. Zeitschr. Berl., 1910, xxiv, pp. 22–29.

Eloesser . Mittheil. a. d. Grenzgeb. d. Med. u. Chir. Jena, 1908, xviii, p. 195.

Evans . Brit. Med. Journ., 1906, i, p. 436.

Goodman . “The Present Status of the Cammidge Reaction,” Internat. Clin., 1909 (19th ser.), ii, p. 167. “The Value of the Cammidge Reaction in the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Disease,” Ann. of Surg. Philad. 1909, xlix, pp. 183, 293.

Grüner . Lancet, 1904, i, p. 1459. Brit. Med. Journ. 1904, i p. 1516.

Grimbert Bernies . Journ. Pharm. and Chem., 1909, vi, p. 30.

Hagen . “The Importance of the Cammidge Reaction for the Differential Diagnosis of Pancreatic Affections,” Beitr. z. klin. Chir. Tübingen, 1909, lxi, p. 750.

Haldane . Edinb. Med. Journ., 1906, N.S., xx, p. 418.

Ham Cleland . Lancet, 1904, i, pp. 1378, 1684; Brit. Med. Journ. 1904, i, p. 1347, ii, p. 43.

Hancock . “A Case of Carcinoma of the Pancreas, with negative so-called Pancreatic Reaction,” Journ. Amer. Med. Assoc., 1906, xlvi, p. 275.

Hess . Deutsch. med. Wochenschr., 1910, xxxvi, p. 2.

Kehr . “Ueber Erkrankungen des Pankreas,” Mitteil. a. d. Grenzgeb. d. Med. u. Chir. Jena, 1909, xx, p. 1. “Bedeutung der Cammidgeprobe,” Münch. med. Wochenschr. lvi, p. 1057.

Kinnicutt . “The Cammidge Reaction in Diseases of the Pancreas,” Med. Record. New York, 1909, lxxv, p. 589.

Klieneberger . Wien. med. Klin., 1910.

Krienitz . “Die praktische Verwerthbarkeit der sog. Cammidgeschen Pankreasreaktion,” Archiv f. Verdauungskrank. Berl., 1909, xv, p. 54.

Labbé . “The Cammidge Reaction and its Relation to Pancreatic Affections,” Presse méd. Par., 1909, xvii, p. 90.

Levisohn . Journ. Amer. Med. Assoc., 1909, lii, p. 1874.

Leyman Stookey . Proc. Amer. Phys. Soc., 1909, pp. 14–15 [in Amer. Journ. Phys. xxv].

Maass . “The Cammidge Reaction in Diseases of the Pancreas,” Med. Klin. Berl., 1909, v, p. 177.

Mayo Robson . Philad. Med. Journ., 1901, vii, p. 1048; Lancet, 1900, ii, p. 235; 1904, i, pp. 773, 845, 911; Brit. Med. Journ. 1908, i, p. 1151; Lancet, 1909, i, p. 371.

Musser . “Acute Pancreatitis,” Univ. of Pennsylv. Med. Bull. Philad., 1909–10, xxii, p. 66.

Musser Steele Fife . “Diagnosis of Pancreatic Disease, with special reference to Laboratory Methods,” Trans. Assoc. Amer. Phys. Philad., 1906, xxi, p. 359.

Moynihan . Lancet, 1902, ii, p. 856.

Pilcher . Ann. of Surg., 1910, li, p. 89.

Pringle . “Case of Abscess of the Pancreas,” Lancet, 1909, ii, p. 17.

Roth . Zeitschr. f. klin. Med., 1909, lxvii, p. 22.

Schmidt . “Nature and Importance of the Cammidge Pancreatic Reaction,” Mitteil. a. d. Grenzgeb. d. Med. u. Chir. Jena, 1909, xx, p. 426.

Schröder . “Concerning the Pancreatic Reaction in the Urine,” Amer. Med. Philad., 1904, viii, p. 406. “The alleged Urinary Manifestations in Diseases of the Pancreas,” Journ. Amer. Med. Assoc. 1908, li, p. 887; Ibid. 1909, lii p. 1874.

Schumm . “Ueber die Brauchbarkeit der sog. Pankreasreaktion nach Cammidge,” Münch. med. Wochenschr., 1909, lvi, p. 39.

Schumm Hegler . Münch. med. Wochenschr., 1909, lvi, p. 40.

Schwarz . “Functional Diagnosis of Pancreatic Affections,” Wien. klin. Wochenschr., 1909, xxii, p. 297.

Smith C. N. Journ. Amer. Med. Assoc., 1909, lii, p. 1828.

Speese Goodman . “The Cammidge Reaction in Experimental Lesions of the Pancreas,” Amer. Journ. Med. Sci. Philad. and New York, 1909, N.S. cxxxvii, p. 107; cxxxviii, p. 103.

Swan Gilbride . “The Cammidge Reaction in the Urine,” New York Med. Journ., 1910, xci, pp. 781–852.

Taylor . “The Cammidge Reaction,” Lancet, 1906, i, p. 1818.

Watson . Lancet, 1908, i, p. 967; 1908, ii, pp. 1519, 1524. Brit. Med. Journ. 1908, i, p. 858.

Willcox . Lancet, 1904, ii, p. 211.