Free accessMeeting reportFirst published online 1909-7
A Case of Rudimentary Uterus Didelphys,with Ectopia of Each Uterine Body in an Inguinal Hernia Sac;With Some Remarks on the Development of the Female Genital Organs
BallantyneJ. W. “Malformations of the Genital Organs in Woman,” Allbutt and Playfair's “System of Gynæcology,” 1906, p. 139.
2.
BellW. Blair. “Abnormalities of the Abdominal and Pelvic Viscera in a Female,”King's Coll. Hosp. Rep., Lond. (1895–6), 1897, iii, p. 69.
3.
Brunner. Beitr. z. klin. Chir., Tüb., 1889, iv, p. 1.
4.
CarmichaelE. Scott. “Hernia of the Uterine Adnexa,”Journ. Obstet. and Gyn., Lond., 1906, x, p. 19.
5.
CranwellD. J.“Les hernies inguinales de l'uterus,”Rév. de Gyn., Par., 1908, xii, p. 777.
6.
GilesArthur. “A Case of Uterus Didelphys, with Observations on the Clinical Importance of this Malformation,”Trans. Obstet. Soc. Lond. (1895), 1896, xxxvii, p. 301.
7.
HartD. Berry. “A Preliminary Note on the Development of the Clitoris, Vagina, and Hymen,”Journ. Anat. and Phys., Lond., 1896–7, xxxi, p. 18.
8.
Hilgenreiner. “Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Hernia uteri inguinalis,”Berl. klin. Wochenschr., 1906, xliii, p. 319.
9.
KeithA.“Human Embryology and Morphology”, 2nd ed., Lond., 1904.
10.
Kussmaul. “Von dem Mangel der Verkümmerung und der Verdopplung der Gebärmutter,” Würzburg, 1859, p. 107.
11.
PozziS.“De la bride masculine du vestibule et de l'origine de l'hymen,”Gaz. méd. de Par., 1884, 7 sér., i, p. 85; Arch. de Tocol., Par., 1884, xi, p. 228.
12.
Roux. “Vice de conformation par aberration inguinale de deux moitiés uterines,”Cong. français de Chir., Par., 1891, v, p. 497.
13.
Werth. “Rudimentäre Entwickelung der Müller'schen Gänge” (Ektopia renum congenita, doppelseitige Hernia ovarialis inguinalis, Exstirpation der Eierstöcke, Heilung), Archiv. f. Gyn., Berl., 1877, xii, p. 132.