Program evaluation helps improve or determine the merit or worth of activities with goals to achieve. However, it remains uncertain whether religious communities fully leverage program evaluation to enhance their initiatives or make more informed decisions. This research aims to explore the current status of program evaluation within religious communities and analyze discussions concerning the characteristics of evaluations, including their purpose, evaluand (programs being evaluated), and methods. By systematically mapping the academic literature on religion, we identified 182 peer-reviewed articles related to program evaluation in this context and used these articles as samples. Quantitative content analysis reveals findings that indicate a growing academic interest in program evaluation within the religious domain. They also highlight several field-specific traits: 1) most evaluations are associated with educational programs; 2) the need to assess the outcomes or impacts of a program often drives the evaluation process; and 3) quantitative research methods are the most commonly used approach. This study represents a groundbreaking effort to explore the relationship between religion and evaluation within academic literature. It adds insights into current evaluation practices in religious contexts and encourages interdisciplinary discussions to enhance the evaluation culture in this field.
AdamsJefferyNevilleStephen. 2020. “Program Evaluation for Health Professionals: What it is, What it isn’t, and How to do it.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods19:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920964345.
2.
AleshireDaniel O.2003. “The Character and Assessment of Learning for Religious Vocation: M.Div. Education and Numbering the Levites.” Theological Education39(1):1–15.
3.
AlkinMarvin C.ChristieChristina A.2023. Evaluation Roots: Theory Influencing Practice, 3rd ed. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
AshTaylaAgaronovAlenYoungTa’LoriaAftosmes-TobioAlyssaDavisonKirsten K.2017. “Family-Based Childhood Obesity Prevention Interventions: A Systematic Review and Quantitative Content Analysis.” International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity14:113. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0571-2.
6.
BielefeldWolfgangClevelandWilliam S.2013. “Faith-Based Organizations as Service Providers and Their Relationship to Government.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly42(3):468–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764012467278.
7.
CnaanRam A.BoddieStephanie C.2002. “Charitable Choice and Faith-Based Welfare: A Call for Social Work.” Social Work47(3):224–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/47.3.224.
CheckKristenGreenRodneyKumarSubodh. 2020. “Toward Laying the Foundation for Christ-Centered Monitoring & Evaluation.” Christian Relief, Development, and Advocacy: The Journal of the Accord Network1(2):61.
10.
ChenHuey-Tsyh. 2015. Practical Program Evaluation: Theory-Driven Evaluation and the Integrated Evaluation Perspective, 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
DirksDennis H.2006. “Toward an Integrated Model of Assessment.” Theological Education41(2):99–110.
EliasJohn L.1979. “Evaluation and the Future of Religious Education.” Religious Education74(6):656–67.
14.
FischerRobert L.StelterJames D.2006. “Testing Faith: Improving the Evidence Base on Faith-Based Human Services.” Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought25(3–4):105–22.
15.
FergusonKristin M.WuQiaobingSpruijt-MetzDonnaDyrnessGrace. 2007. “Outcomes Evaluation in Faith-Based Social Services: Are We Evaluating Faith Accurately?”Research on Social Work Practice17(2):264–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731505283698.
16.
FournierD. M. (1995). Establishing evaluative conclusions: A distinction between general and working logic. In Reasoning in evaluation: Inferential links and leaps (New Directions for Evaluation No. 68) (pp. 15–32). Jossey-Bass.
GlewwePaulToddPetra. 2022. Impact Evaluation in International Development: Theory, Methods, and Practice. Washington, DC: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, The World Bank.
19.
GorsuchRichard L.1976. “Research and Evaluation: Their Role in Decision Making in the Religious Setting.” Review of Religious Research17(2):93–101. https://doi.org/10.2307/3510627.
20.
GrettenbergerSusan E.BartkowskiJohn P.SmithStephen R.2006. “Evaluating the Effectiveness of Faith-Based Welfare Agencies: Methodological Challenges and Possibilities.” Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought25(3–4):223–40. https://doi.org/10.1300/J377v25n03_14.
21.
HartleyLoyde H.2003. “Assessing Assessment: An Accreditation Visitor’s View of ATS Outcome-Oriented Standards.” Theological Education39(1):101–16.
22.
HarrisJohn. 2003. “Assessment of Ministry Preparation to Increase Understanding.” Theological Education39(2):117–36.
23.
HouseErnest R.HoweKenneth R.1999. Values in Evaluation and Social Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
24.
JanzenRichWiebeDerksen. 2011. “Putting God in the Logic Model: Developing a National Framework for the Evaluation of Faith-Based Organizations.” Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation25(1):1–26. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.025.001.
25.
JeynesWilliam H.2012. “A Meta-Analysis on the Effects and Contributions of Public, Public Charter, and Religious Schools on Student Outcomes.” Peabody Journal of Education87(3):305–35.
26.
JohnsonByronTompkinsRalphWebbDerek. 2002. Objective Hope: Assessing the Effectiveness of Faith-Based Organizations: A Review of the Literature. Philadelphia, PA: Center for Research on Religion and Urban Civil Society.
27.
JohnsonDavid W.1972. “Evaluation as a Development in Religious Research.” Review of Religious Research14(2):112–7.
28.
KallemeynLeanne M.2009. “Responding to the Demands of Assessment and Evaluation in Catholic Education.” Journal of Catholic Education12(4):498–518. https://doi.org/10.15365/joce.1204052013.
29.
KumarSandeep. 2022. “Toward Building Evidence of Kingdom Impact.” Christian Relief, Development, and Advocacy: The Journal of the Accord Network3(2):24.
30.
LiberatiAlessandroAltmanDouglas G.TetzlaffJenniferMulrowCynthiaGøtzschePeter C.IoannidisJohn P. A.ClarkeMikeDevereauxP. J.KleijnenJosMoherDavid. 2009. “The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration.” PLoS Medicine6(7):e1000100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100.
31.
LevinJeff. 2014. “Faith-Based Initiatives in Health Promotion: History, Challenges, and Current Partnerships.” American Journal of Health Promotion28(3):139–41. https://doi.org/10.4278/ajhp.130403-CIT-149.
32.
MorganJonathan R.2021. “Evidence-Based Practice in Mission: A Method for Establishing Best Practices and Achieving Desired Goals.” International Bulletin of Mission Research45(1):26–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/2396939320908353.
33.
NewcomerKathryn E.HatryHarry P.WholeyJoseph S.2015. Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation, 4th ed.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
PattonMichael Q.1997. Utilization-Focused Evaluation: The New Century Text. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
SchwandtT. A. (2015). Evaluation Foundations Revisited: Cultivating a Life of the Mind for Practice. Stanford University Press.
37.
ScrivenMichael. 1991. Evaluation Thesaurus, 4th ed.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
38.
ScrivenM. (2007). The logic of evaluation. In HansenH.V., et al. (Eds), Dissensus and the Search for Common Ground, CD-ROM (pp. 1–16). Windsor, ON: OSSA.
39.
SevereMichael K.2010. “Epistemological Assumptions in Evaluation: The Intersection between Philosophy and Practice in Youth Ministry.” Christian Education Journal7(1):6–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/073989131000700102.
40.
SevereMichael K.2013. “The Powers of Evaluation: The Understanding and Practice of Evaluation in Youth Ministry Communities of Practice in Illinois.” Christian Education Journal10(2):286–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/07398913130100020.
41.
StufflebeamDaniel L.CorynChris L. S.2014. Evaluation Theory, Models, and Applications, 2nd ed.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
42.
StufflebeamDaniel L.MadausGeorge F.KellaghanThomas, eds. 2000. Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation, 2nd ed. Evaluation in Education and Human Services. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
43.
TeasdaleRebecca M.StrasserMikaylaMooreCeilyGrahamKara E.2023. “Evaluative Criteria in Practice: Findings from an Analysis of Evaluations Published in Evaluation and Program Planning.” Evaluation and Program Planning97(April):102226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102226.
44.
TerryJohn D.SmithAnna R.WarrenPeter R.MillerMarissa E.McQuillinSam D.WolferTerry A.WeistMarch D.2015. “Incorporating Evidence-Based Practices into Faith-Based Organization Service Programs.” Journal of Psychology and Theology43(3):212–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/009164711504300306.
45.
WilsonPaul N.2011. “Shared Learning in and from Transformational Development Programs.” Transformation (Exeter)28(2):103–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265378810396297.
46.
WoolnoughBrian E.2008. “But How do We know We are Making a Difference? Issues Relating to the Evaluation of Christian Development Work.” Transformation25(2–3):134–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/026537880802500307.
