This study investigates factors by integrating resource dependence, institutional, organizational ecology, and entrepreneurship theories to understand factors associated with U.S. congregational income using a data-driven approach. I analyze 76 features across 1,702 congregations from the National Congregations Study (2006–2007, 2012, 2018–2019) using an AutoML approach. The gradient boosted random forest model identifies that successful congregations increase service frequency, utilize technology, and establish endowment funds to secure resources. They adopt professional financial management practices, align demographic composition with local communities, engage in social service activities, and demonstrate entrepreneurial resourcefulness. These actions reflect adaptive strategies, institutional conformity, ecological fit, and entrepreneurial resourcefulness, enhancing the financial viability of congregations.
AbbasAnsarDianEkowatiFendySuhariadiAishaAnwar. 2024. Human capital creation: a collective psychological, social, organizational and religious perspective. Journal of Religion and Health63(3): 2168–2200.
2.
BakerTedElliotNelson R.2005. Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly50: 329–366.
3.
BalogAngela M.BakerLaKami T.WalkerAlan G.2014. “Religiosity and Spirituality in Entrepreneurship: A Review and Research Agenda.”Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion11(2):159–86. doi:10.1080/14766086.2013.836127.
4.
BeckfordJames A.2003. Social Theory and Religion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5.
CarneyMichael. 2005. “Corporate Governance and Competitive Advantage in Family-Controlled Firms.”Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice29(3):249–65. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00081.x.
6.
CastrilliMichael JCharles EZech. 2016. Parish Finance: Best Practices in Church Management. Paulist Press.
7.
ChavesMark. 1993. “Denominations as Dual Structures: An Organizational Analysis.”Sociology of Religion54(2):147–69. doi:10.2307/3712137.
8.
ChavesMark. 2021. National Congregations Study Cumulative Codebook for Waves I–IV (1998, 2006–07, 2012, and 2018–19). Durham, NC: Duke University, Department of Sociology. doi:10.3886/icpsr03471.v2.
9.
ChavesMarkAndersonShawna L.2014. “Changing American Congregations: Findings from the Third Wave of the National Congregations Study.”Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion53(4):676–86. doi:10.1111/jssr.12151.
10.
ChavesMarkSuttonJohn R.2004. “Organizational Consolidation in American Protestant Denominations, 1890–1990.”Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion43(1):51–66. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5906.2004.00217.x.
11.
ClarkJoseph. 2020. “Investment in Local Health-Shaping Institutions: Reconsidering the Role of the Religious Environment.”Social Science & Medicine262:113048. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113048.
12.
CnaanRam A.2009. “Valuing the Contribution of Urban Religious Congregations.”Public Management Review11(5):641–62. doi:10.1080/14719030902798305.
13.
DiMaggioPaul J.PowellWalter W.1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.”American Sociological Review48(2):147–60. doi:10.2307/2095101.
14.
DoughertyKevin D.NeubertMitchell J.ParkJerry Z.2019. “Prosperity Beliefs and Value Orientations: Fueling or Suppressing Entrepreneurial Activity.”Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion58(2):475–93. doi:10.1111/jssr.12598.
15.
FultonBrad. 2023. Capacity Building among Religious Congregations in the US. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201600457.
16.
HannanMichael T.FreemanJohn. 1977. “The Population Ecology of Organizations.”American Journal of Sociology82(5):929–64. doi:10.1086/226424.
17.
HillmanAmy J.WithersMichael C.CollinsBrian J.2009. “Resource Dependence Theory: A Review.”Journal of Management35(6):1404–27. doi:10.1177/0149206309343469.
18.
IannacconeLaurence R.1988. “A Formal Model of Church and Sect.”American Journal of Sociology94:S241–68. doi:10.1086/228948.
19.
MiaoChaoRutherfordMatthew W.PollackJeffrey M.2017. “An Exploratory Meta-Analysis of the Nomological Network of Bootstrapping in SMEs.”Journal of Business Venturing Insights8:1–8. doi:10.1016/j.jbvi.2017.04.002.
20.
MundeyPeterKingDavid P.FultonBrad R.2019. “The Economic Practices of US Congregations: A Review of Current Research and Future Opportunities.”Social Compass66(3):400–417. doi:10.1177/0037768619852230.
21.
OlsonDaniel V. A.1999. “Religious Pluralism and US Church Membership: A Reassessment.”Sociology of Religion60(2):149–73. doi:10.2307/3711746.
22.
ParboteeahK. PraveenWalterSascha G.BlockJörn H.2015. “When Does Christian Religion Matter for Entrepreneurial Activity? The Contingent Effect of a Country’s Investments into Knowledge.”Journal of Business Ethics130:447–65. doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2239-z.
23.
PfefferJeffreySalancikGerald. 2015. “External Control of Organizations—Resource Dependence Perspective.” Pp. 355–70 in Organizational Behavior 2: Essential Theories of Process and Structure, edited by MinerJ. B.New York, NY: Routledge. doi:10.2307/2065200.
24.
RalphAllison K.FultonBrad R.AllenSamuel. 2022. “Faith-Based Public Foundations: Identifying the Field and Assessing Its Impact.”The Foundation Review14(1):6. doi:10.9707/1944-5660.1595.
25.
ReimerSam. 2011. “Orthodoxy Niches: Diversity in Congregational Orthodoxy among Three Protestant Denominations in the United States.”Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion50(4):763–79. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5906.2011.01598.x.
26.
ReimerSamChapmanMarkJanzenRichWatsonJamesWilkinsonMichael. 2016. “Christian Churches and Immigrant Support in Canada: An Organizational Ecology Perspective.”Review of Religious Research58(4):495–513. doi:10.1007/s13644-016-0252-7.
27.
ScheitleChristopher P.2007. Organizational niches and religious markets: Uniting two literatures. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion3.
28.
ScheitleChristopher P.DoughertyKevin D.2008. “The Sociology of Religious Organizations.”Sociology Compass2(3):981–99. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9020.2008.00113.x.
Stewart-ThomasMichelle. 2010. “Gendered Congregations, Gendered Service: The Impact of Clergy Gender on Congregational Social Service Participation.”Gender, Work & Organization17(4):406–432. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2009.00484.x.
31.
StyhreAlexander. (2002). Non?linear change in organizations: organization change management informed by complexity theory. Leadership & Organization Development Journal23(6): 343–351.
32.
TraceyPaul. 2012. “Religion and Organization: A Critical Review of Current Trends and Future Directions.”The Academy of Management Annals6(1):87–134. doi:10.1080/19416520.2012.660761.
33.
VoasDavidChavesMark. 2018. “Even Intense Religiosity is Declining in the United States.”Sociological Science5:694–710. doi:10.15195/v5.a29.
34.
WarfBarneyWinsbergMorton. 2010. “Geographies of Megachurches in the United States.”Journal of Cultural Geography27(1):33–51. doi:10.1080/08873631003593216.
35.
WineburgRobert J.1994. “A Longitudinal Case Study of Religious Congregations in Local Human Services.”Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly23(2):159–69. doi:10.1177/089976409402300205.
36.
WinborgJoakimHansLandström. 2001. Financial bootstrapping in small businesses: Examining small business managers’ resource acquisition behaviors. Journal of business venturing16(3): 235–254.
37.
ZechCharles EMillerRobert J.2008. Listening to the people of god: closing, rebuilding, and revitalizing parishes. Paulist Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
