Assessing a Welfare Program's Effects on Social Mobility in Brazil's “Golden Age”: The Intersectionality of Race,Gender,and Redistributive Social Programs in Two Brazilian Cities
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online December, 2022
Assessing a Welfare Program's Effects on Social Mobility in Brazil's “Golden Age”: The Intersectionality of Race,Gender,and Redistributive Social Programs in Two Brazilian Cities
How do welfare programs affect beneficiaries' perceptions of social mobility? This paper uses the case of Brazil's Bolsa Família Program to assess whether, how, and to what degree the welfare program affects beneficiaries' views of their potential social mobility. It makes a key contribution to the understanding of social mobility by incorporating the role that race and gender play in beneficiary respondent's evaluation of social mobility. Use of an original field survey undergirds the finding that, in contrast to conventional understandings of Brazilian racial and social dynamics, beneficiary status operates differently for Afro-Brazilian and White beneficiaries, as well as for male and female beneficiaries. Specifically, that the program has significant empowerment effects for White women beneficiaries, but that it does not affect the evaluations of Afro-Brazilian women.
AmblerKatede BrauwAlan. (2017). The impacts of cash transfers on women’s empowerment: Learning from Pakistan’s BISP program. Social protection and labor discussion paper no. 1702. World Bank Group.
2.
AppaduraiA. (2004). “The capacity to aspire,” In RaoV.WaltonM. (Eds.), Culture and public action, The World Bank, 59–84.
3.
AttahRamlatuBarcaValentinaKardanAndrewMacauslanIanMerttensFredPelleranoLuca. (2016). Can social protection affect psychosocial wellbeing and Why does this matter? Lessons from cash transfers in Sub-saharan Africa. The Journal of Development Studies.52(8),1115–1131, https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2015.1134777
4.
BaileyStanley R. (2009). Legacies of race: Identities, attitudes, and politics in Brazil. Stanford University Press.
5.
BarrientosArmandoDebowiczDaríoWoolandIngrid. (2016). Heterogeneity in bolsa família outcomes. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance62(3), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2016.07.008
6.
BastagliFrancescaHagen-ZankerJessicaHarmanLukeBarcaValentinaSturgeGeorginaSchmidtTanjaPelleranoLuca. (2016). Cash transfers: What does the evidence Say? A rigorous review of programme impact and of the role of design and implementation features. Overseas Development Institute
7.
BeckerKalinca LeiaArends-KuenningMary Paula. (2020). Analysis of math test score Gap between White and non-White students in Brazilian public schools: SAEB 2015. The Review of Black Political Economy.47(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/0034644619879381
8.
BernardT.DerconS.OrkinK.TaffesseA. S. (2019). Parental aspirations for children’s education: Is there a” girl effect"? experimental evidence from rural Ethiopia. AEA Papers and Proceedings. 109, 127–132. https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20191072
9.
Bernardino-CostaJ. (2014). Intersectionality and female domestic workers’ unions in Brazil. Women’s Studies International Forum46(3), 72–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2014.01.004
10.
CórdovaAbby. (2009). Measuring relative wealth using household asset indicators and principal component analysis (PCA). insights series 6. Latin American Public Opinion Project, Vanderbilt University
11.
CorrêaD. S.CheibubJ. A. (2016). The antiincumbent effects of conditional cash transfer programs. Latin American Politics and Society58(1), 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2016.00296.x
12.
DaltonP. S.GhosalS.ManiA. (2016). Poverty and aspirations failure. The Economic Journal, 126(590), 165–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12210
13.
de BrauwAlanGilliganDaniel O.HoddinottJohnRoyShalini. (2013). The impact of bolsa família on women’s decision-making power. World Development,59(3), 487–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.02.003
14.
De MicheliDavid. (2018). The racialized effects of social programs in Brazil. Latin American Politics and Society,60(1), 52–75. https://doi.org/10.1017/lap.2017.6
15.
FreyreGilberto (1933) 1987. The masters and the slaves: A study in the development of Brazilian civilization. Translated by Samuel Putnam. University of California Press.
16.
GarciaS.HarkerA.CuartasC. (2019). Building dreams: The short-term impacts of a conditional cash transfer program on aspirations for higher education. International Journal of Educational Development,34(1), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2018.12.006
Hagen-ZankerJessicaPelleranoLucaBastagliFrancescaHarmonLukeBarcaValentinaSturgeGeorginaSchmidtTanjaLaingCalvin. (2017). The impact of cash transfers on women and girls: A summary of the evidence. ODI briefing. Overseas Development Institute.
19.
HandaSudhanshuPetermanAmberDavisBenjaminStampiniMarco. (2009). Opening Up pandora’s Box: The effect of gender targeting and conditionality on household spending behavior in Mexico’s Progresa program. World Development, 37(6), 1129–1142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.10.005
20.
HunterW.PowerT. J. (2007). Rewarding lula: Executive power, social policy, and the Brazilian elections of 2006. Latin American Politics and Society, 49(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2007.tb00372.x
21.
HunterWendySugiyamaNatasha Borges. (2014). Transforming subjects into citizens: Insights from Brazil’s bolsa família. Perspectives on Politics, 12(4), 829–845. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592714002151.
22.
KaknesElizabeth. (2016). Politics, Poverty, and Policy in Brazil. PhD diss, University of Virginia. https://doi.org/10.18130/V3859X
23.
KingMary C. (2009). Occupational segregation by race and Sex in Brazil,” 1989–2001. The Review of Black Political Economy,36(2), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12114-009-9038-2
24.
KingstonePeter. (2019). The political economy of latin america: Reflections on neoliberalism after the commodity boom. Routledge.
25.
LaytonMatthewSmithAmy Erica. (2015). Incorporating marginal citizens and voters: The conditional electoral effects of targeted social assistance in latin america. Comparative Political Studies,48(7), 854–881. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414014565889
26.
LaytonMatthewSmithAmy Erica. (2017). Is It race, class or gender? The sources of perceived discrimination in Brazil. Latin American Politics & Society, 59(1), 52–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/laps.12010
27.
Leão RegoWalquiriaPinzaniAlessandro. (2014). Vozes do bolsa familia: Autonomia, dinheiro, e cidadania. Editora UNESP.
28.
LicioE. C.RennóL. R.CastroH. C. D. O. D. (2009). Bolsa família e voto na eleição presidencial de 2006: Em busca do elo perdido. Opinião Pública,151, 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-62762009000100002
29.
LovellP. A. (1999). Women and racial inequality. In HansardM. (Ed.) Racial politics in contemporary Brazil, Duke University Press, 138–159.
30.
MadridRaulHunterWendyWeylandKurt, (eds.) (2010). Leftist governments in latin america: Successes and shortcomings. Cambridge University Press, 140–181.
31.
Martínez-FranzoniJulianaVoorendKoen. (2012). Blacks, Whites, or grays? Conditional transfers and gender equality in latin america. Social Politics,19(3), 383–407https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxs008
32.
MettlerSuzanneSossJoe (2004). The consequences of public policy for democratic citizenship: Bridging policy studies and mass politics. Perspectives on Politics, 2(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592704000623
Mitchell-WalthourGladys. (2018). The politics of Blackness: Racial identity and political behavior in contemporary Brazil. Cambridge University Press.
35.
Mitchell-WalthourG. L.2017. Economic pessimism and racial discrimination in Brazil. Journal of Black Studies, 48(7), 675–697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12114-009-9051-5
36.
NascimentoAbadias doNascimentoElisa Larkin. (2001). Dance of deception: A reading of race relations in Brazil. In HamiltonC.HuntelyL.AlexanderN.GuimarãesA.JamesW (Eds.),Beyond racism: Race and inequality in Brazil, South Africa, and the United StatesLynn Reinner Press. 105–157.
37.
NeriM.C. (2007). Pobreza e políticas sociais na década da redução da desigualdade. Nueva Sociedad, 1, 53–75.
38.
NeriM.C. (2014). The New Brazilian middle class and the bright Side of the poor. Poverty in Focus, 26, 17.
39.
NeriM. C. (2015). Consumo, pobreza e Bem-viver. Ciência Hoje, 332, 14–15.
40.
PaixãoMarcelotCarvanoL. M. (2008). Relatório anual das desigualdades raciais no brasil, 2007–2008. Editora Garamond.
41.
PaixãoMarceloRossettoIreneMontovaneleFabianaCarvanoLuiz M. (2011). Relatorio anual das desigualdades raciais no Brasil; 2009–2010. Editora Garamond.
PNAD. (1999). Pesquisa nacional por amostra de domicilios [Brazilian household survey]. IBGE
44.
PNAD. (2013). Pesquisa nacional por amostra de domicilios [Brazilian household survey]. IBGE
45.
RayD.2003. Aspirations, poverty and economic change. In Working paper.
46.
SamuelsFionaStavropoulouMaria. (2016). Being able to breathe again’: The effects of cash transfer programs on psychosocial wellbeing. The Journal of Development Studies,52(8), 1099–1114. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2015.1134773
47.
SekhonJasjeet S. (2011). Multivariate and propensity score matching software with automated balance optimization, Journal of Statistical Software, 427, 1–52.
48.
SoaresS.RibasR. P.SoaresF. V. (2010). Targeting and coverage of the bolsa familia programme: Why knowing what you measure is important in choosing the numbers. IPC Working paper No. 71.
49.
SossJ. (2002). Unwanted claims: The politics of participation in the US welfare system. University of Michigan Press.
50.
SugiyamaNatasha B.HunterWendy. (2020). Do conditional cash transfers empower women? Insights from Brazil’s bolsa família. Latin American Politics and Society.62(2), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1017/lap.2019.60.
51.
TellesE. E. (2004). Race in another america: The significance of skin color in Brazil. Princeton University Press.
52.
TellesEdward E.BaileyStanley R. (2013). Understanding latin American beliefs about racial inequality. American Journal of Sociology,118(6), 1559–1595. https://doi.org/10.1086/670268
53.
TorcheFlorenciaCosta RibeiroCarlos. (2010). Pathways of change in social mobility: Industrialization, education, and growing fluidity in Brazil. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 28, 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2010.03.005
54.
ZuccoCesar. (2008). The president’s ‘new’ constituency: Lula and the pragmatic vote in Brazil’s 2006 presidential elections. Journal of Latin American Studies,40(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X07003628.
55.
ZuccoCesar. (2013). When Pay outs Pay Off: Conditional cash-transfers and voting behavior in Brazil 2002– 2010. American Journal of Political Science, 57(4), 810–822.
56.
ZuccoCesar. (2015). The impacts of conditional cash transfers in four presidential elections 2002–2014. Brazilian Political Science Review, 91, 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-38212014000200006
