Abstract
James Cone can be difficult for any reader, but for White Christians he can be exceedingly difficult. Often White readers have a problem understanding both his agenda and the rhetorical arguments he uses. This article examines Cone within his context, seeking to help White readers better understand Cone’s agenda and his very prominent persona, while also suggesting ways that Cone might inform and help White theologians, pastors, and laypeople better understand themselves and their own theological traditions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.