BlackP.. (1989), ‘Introduction’, in AdeyP., BlissJ., HeadJ., and ShayerM. (eds.), Adolescent Development and School Science, London: Falmer Press.
2.
BlackP. J., and LucasA.. (1994), Children's Informal Ideas in Science, London: Routledge.
3.
BriggsH., and HoldingB.. (1986), ‘Aspects of Secondary of Elementary Ideas in Chemistry’, Leeds: Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education, University of Leeds.
4.
BrookA., BriggsH., and DriverR.. (1984), ‘Aspects of Secondary Students’ Understanding of the Particulate Nature of Matter,’ Children's Learning in Science Project, Leeds: Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education, University of Leeds.
5.
CarmichaelC., DriverR., HoldingB., PhillipsI., TwiggerZ., and WattsD. M.. (1990), ‘Research on Students’ Conceptions in Science: a bibliography’, Children's Learning in Science Project, Leeds: Centre for Science and Maths Education, University of Leeds.
6.
DriverR., LeachJ., ScottP., and Wood-RobinsonC.. (1994a), ‘Young people's understanding of science concepts: implications of cross-age studies for curriculum planning’,Studies in Science Education24, 75–100.
7.
DriverR., SquiresA., RushworthP., and Wood-RobinsonV.. (1994b), Making Sense of Secondary Science: research into children's ideas, London: Routledge.
8.
DuitR.. (1991), ‘Students’ conceptual frameworks: consequences for learning science’, in GlynnS. M., YeanyR. H., and BrittonB. K. (eds.), The Psychology of Learning Science, Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
9.
FenshamP., GunstoneR., and WhiteR.. (1994), The Content of Science: a constructivist approach to its teaching and learning, London: Falmer Press.
10.
GarnettPat. J., GarnettPam. J., and HacklingM. W.. (1995), ‘Students’ alternative conceptions in chemistry: a review of research and implications for teaching and learning’,Studies in Science Education25, 69–95.
11.
HewsonP. W., and HewsonM. G. A. B.. (1992), ‘The conditions of conceptual change in the classroom’,International Journal of Science Education11(special issue), 541–53.
12.
LaffertyP., and RoweJ. (eds.) (1994), The Hutchinson Dictionary of Science, revised edition, London: Helicon.
13.
LavertyD. T., and McGarveyJ. E. B.. (1991), ‘A “constructivist” approach to learning’,Education in Chemistry28(4), 99–102.
14.
PetersenR. F., and TreagustD. F.. (1989), ‘Grade 12 students’ misconceptions of covalent bonding and structure’,Journal of Chemical Education66, 459–60.
15.
PfundtH., and DuitR.. (1994), Bibliography: students’ alternative frameworks and science education, Kiel, Germany: Institute of Education, University of Kiel.
16.
PopeM. L., and DenicoloP.. (1986), ‘Intuitive theories — a researcher's dilemma: some practical methodological implications’,British Educational Research Journal12(2), 153–66.
17.
PowneyJ., and WattsM.. (1987), Interviewing in Educational Research, London: Routledge.
18.
Primary School Teachers and Science Project (PSTS) (1988-93), Working papers 1-17, Oxford: Oxford University Department of Educational Studies (mimeo).
19.
StrikeK. A., and PosnerG. J.. (1985), ‘A conceptual change view of learning and understanding’, in PinesL. H. T., and WestA. L. (eds.), Cognitive Structure and Conceptual Change, London: Academic Press.
20.
TaberK. S.. (1994a), ‘The Teacher-researcher's Duty: accounting for ourselves to our co-learners’, paper presented at ‘Accounting for Ourselves’, World Congress 3: Action Learning, Action Research and Process Management, University of Bath, July.
21.
TaberK. S.. (1994b), ‘Misunderstanding the ionic bond’,Education in Chemistry31(4), 100–3.
22.
TaberK. S.. (1995a), ‘An analogy for discussing progression in learning chemistry’,School Science Review76(276), 91–5.
23.
TaberK. S.. (1995b), ‘Tajinder: a case study of concept development in chemistry’ (available from the author).
24.
TaberK. S.. (1995c), ‘Development of student understanding: a case study of stability and lability in cognitive structure’,Research in Science and Technological Education13(1), 87–97.
25.
TaberK. S.. (1995d), ‘Prior Learning as an Epistemological Block? The octet rule — an example from science education’, paper prepared for the European Conference on Educational Research, University of Bath, September.
26.
TaberK. S., and WattsM.. (1996), ‘The secret life of the chemical bond: students’ anthropomorphic and animistic references to bonding’,International Journal of Science Education18(5), 557–68.
27.
TobinK., and TippinsD.. (1993), ‘Constructivism as a referent for teaching and learning’, in TobinK. (ed.), The Practice of Constructivism in Science Education, Hove: Erlbaum.
28.
WalkerR.. (1993), ‘The conduct of educational case studies: ethics, theory and procedures’, in HammersleyMartyn (ed.), Controversies in Classroom Research, second edition, Buckingham: Open University Press.
29.
WattsD. M.. (1988), ‘From concept maps to curriculum signposts’,Physics Education23, 74–9.
30.
WattsD. M.. (1992), ‘Children's learning of difficult concepts in chemistry’, in AtlayM., BennettS., DutchS., LevinsonR., and WestD. (eds.), Open Chemistry, London: Hodder & Stoughton.