BennettN., and DunneE.. (1992), Managing Classroom Groups, Hemel Hempstead: Simon & Schuster.
2.
BiottC., and EasenP.. (1994), Collaborative Learning in Staffrooms and Classrooms, London: Fulton.
3.
BrownA., CampioneJ., FerreraR., ReeveR., and PalincsarA.. (1991), ‘Interactive learning and individual understanding: the case of reading and mathematics’, in LandsmannL. T. (ed.), Culture, Schooling and Psychological Development: human development4, Norwood, NJ.: Ablex.
4.
CobbP., WoodT., and YackelE.. (1991), ‘A constructivist approach to second grade mathematics’, in von GlasersfeldE. (ed.), Radical Constructivism in Mathematics Education, London: Kluwer.
5.
CobbP.. (1993), ‘Discourse, mathematical thinking and classroom practice’, in FormanE., MinnickN., and StoneC. (eds.), Contexts for Learning: sociocultural dynamics in children's development, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6.
CohenE.. (1994), ‘Restructuring the classroom: conditions for productive small groups’,Review of Educational Research64(1), 1–35.
7.
CooperC., MarquisA., and EdwardD.. (1986), ‘Four perspectives on peer learning among elementary school children’, in MuellerE., and CooperC. (eds.), Process and Outcome in Peer Relationships, London: Academic Press.
8.
DoiseW.. (1990), ‘The development of individual competencies through social interaction’, in FootH., MorganM., and ShuteR. (eds.), Children helping Children, Chichester: Wiley.
9.
DowrickN.. (1993), ‘Side by side: a more appropriate form of peer interaction for infant pupils?’,British Journal of Educational Research19(5), 499–515.
10.
GaltonM., and WilliamsonJ.. (1992), Group Work in the Primary Classroom, London: Routledge.
11.
HooperS.. (1992), ‘Effects of peer interaction during computer-based mathematics instruction’,Journal of Educational Research85(3), 180–9.
12.
HoylesC.. (1985), ‘What is the point of group discussion in mathematics?’,Educational Studies in Mathematics16(2), 205–14.
13.
JohnsonD., and JohnsonR.. (1992), ‘Encouraging thinking through constructive controversy’, in DavidsonN., and WorshamT. (eds.), Enhancing Thinking through Cooperative Learning, New York: Teachers’ College.
14.
JonesG., and CarterG.. (1994), ‘Verbal and non-verbal behaviour of ability-grouped dyads’,Journal of Research in Science Teaching31(6), 603–19.
15.
MulryanC.. (1992), ‘Student passivity during co-operative small groups in mathematics’,Journal of Educational Research85(5), 261–73.
16.
NoddingsN.. (1989), ‘Theoretical and practical concerns about small groups in mathematics’,Elementary School Journal89(5), 607–23.
17.
PagettL.. (1994), ‘“No fears with peers”: a personal reflection on peer group tutoring in the context of reading development’,Reading28(1), 31–5.
18.
PetersonP., and SwingS.. (1985) ‘Students’ cognitions as mediators of the effectiveness of small-group learning’,Journal of Educational Psychology77(3), 299–312.
19.
PowerB.. (1989), ‘Beyond “geddinagrupe”: a case study of three first-grade collaborators’,Language Arts66(7), 767–75.
20.
PriskT.. (1987), ‘Letting them get on with it: a study of unsupervised group talk in an infant school’, in PollardA. (ed.), Children and their Primary Schools, Lewes: Falmer.
21.
RogoffB.. (1990), Apprenticeship in Thinking: cognitive development in social context, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
TannS., and ArmitageM.. (1986), ‘Time for talk’,Reading20(3), 184–8.
23.
TerwelJ.. (1994), ‘Co-operative learning and adaptive instruction in a mathematics curriculum’,Journal of Curriculum Studies26(2), 143–62.
24.
TudgeJ.. (1992), ‘Processes and consequences of peer collaboration: a Vygotskian analysis’,Child Development63(6), 1364–79.
25.
WebbN.. (1991), ‘Task-related verbal interaction and mathematics learning in small groups’,Journal for Research in Mathematics Education22(5), 366–89.
26.
WilkinsonL., and MartinoA.. (1993), ‘Students’ disagreements during small-group mathematical problem-solving’, in DavisR., and MaherC. (eds.), Schools, Mathematics and the World of Reality, Boston: Allyn & Bacon.