AuC. P.. (1989), ‘A study of teacher role expectations as perceived by students and teachers in Hong Kong’,Chinese University of Hong Kong Education Journal17(2), 154–61.
3.
BallantyneR. R., and OelofseC. G.. (1989), ‘Implementing environmental education policy in South African schools’,South African Journal of Education9(1), 7–12.
4.
BottinelliC. A.. (1980), ‘The Efficacy of Population/Resources/Environmental Simulation Games and Traditional Teaching Strategies: short and long-term cognitive and affective retention’, unpublished Ed.D. dissertation, University of Colorado, Denver. Dissertation Abstracts, 41 (4), 1518.
5.
Curriculum Development Council (1984), Syllabus for Geography (Forms 4-5), Hong Kong: Government Printer.
6.
Curriculum Development Council (1992), Guidelines on Environmental Education in Schools, Hong Kong: Government Printer.
7.
DaughertyR., ThomasB., JonesG. E., and DaviesS.. (1991), GCSE in Wales, Swansea: Welsh Office.
8.
FennesseyG. M., LivingstonS. A., EdwardsK. J., KidderS. J., and NafzigerA. W.. (1974), ‘Simulation gaming and conventional instruction in the teaching of ecology’,Journal of Environmental Education5(4), 21–4.
9.
FullanM.. (1991), The New Meaning of Educational Change, New York: Teachers’ College Press.
10.
GagneR.. (1975), Essentials of Learning for Instruction, Hinsdale, Ill.: Dryden Press.
11.
HorwoodB.. (1989), review ofEnvironmental Education: practice and possibility, Journal of Curriculum Studies21(3), 287–8.
12.
LeeC. K. J.. (1993), ‘Geography teaching in England and Hong Kong: contributions towards environmental education’,International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education2(1), 25–40.
13.
LlewellynJ., HancockG., KirstM., and RoeloffsK.. (1982), A Perspective on Education in Hong Kong: report by a visiting panel, Hong Kong: Government Printer.
14.
MorrisP.. (1990), ‘Curriculum Development in Hong Kong’, Education Paper 7, Hong Kong: Faculty of Education, University of Hong Kong.
15.
RobinsonR.. (1986), ‘Geography teachers’ reflections on their teaching about development’,Journal of Curriculum Studies18(4), 409–27.
16.
SingletaryT.. (1992), ‘Case studies of selected high school environmental education classes’,Journal of Environmental Education23(4), 35–40.
17.
SporkH.. (1991), ‘Environmental Education: a mismatch between theory and practice’, paper presented at the 1991 symposium of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Gold Coast, Queensl., Australia.
18.
StimpsonP. G.. (1991), ‘The null curriculum: beliefs about education and geography in Hong Kong’,Curriculum Perspectives11(4), 11–17.
19.
StimpsonP. G.. (1993), ‘The mismatch between aims and teaching styles in environmental education in Hong Kong’,Proceedings of the UNESCO Asia-Pacific Regional Experts’ Meeting on overcoming the Barriers to Environmental Education through Teacher Education, 5-9 July, Nathan, Queensl.: Griffith University (diskette).
20.
TomlinsonP.. (1986), ‘Values teaching: some classroom principles’, in TomlinsonP., and QuintonM. (eds.), Values across the Curriculum, Lewes: Falmer Press.
21.
UNESCO (1980), Environmental Education in the Light of the Tbilisi Conference, Paris: UNESCO.
22.
WillettJ. B.. (1980), ‘A Study to develop Typology of the perceived Teaching Styles of Hong Kong Secondary School Physics Teachers using a Technique of Cluster Analysis’, unpublished M.Ed dissertation, University of Hong Kong.
23.
WongE. M. O.. (1992), ‘A Study of the perceived Teaching Styles in Environmental Education through Geography in Hong Kong’, unpublished M.Ed. dissertation, University of Hong Kong.