AndersonL. M.. (1989), ‘Learners and learning’, in ReynoldsM. C. (ed.), Knowledge Base for Beginning Teachers, Oxford: Pergamon Press.
2.
BereiterC., and ScardamaliaM.. (1985), ‘Cognitive coping strategies and the problem of inert knowledge’, in ChapmanS., SegalJ., and GlaserR. (eds.), Thinking and Learning Skills2, Hillside, N.J.: Erlbaum.
3.
BerlinerD.. (1983), ‘Developing conceptions of classroom environments: some light on the T in the classroom studies of ATI’,Educational Psychologist18, 1–13.
4.
BeveridgeM.. (1990), ‘Pupils’ Knowledge of History: issues in teaching and learning’, paper delivered at a series of seminars entitled ‘Issues in the Teaching and Assessment of Historical Knowledge’, University of Bristol, October.
5.
BlumenfeldP.C., MergentollerT. R., and SwarlhotD. W.. (1987), ‘Tasks as a heuristic for understanding student learning and motivation’,Journal of Curriculum Studies19, 135–48.
6.
BlythW. A. L.. (1990), Making the Grade for Primary Humanities, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
CarterK., and DoyleW.. (1988), ‘Teachers’ knowledge structures and comprehension processes’, in CalderheadJ. (ed.), Exploring Teachers’ Thinking, Salisbury: Cassell.
9.
ColthamJ., and FinesJ.. (1971), Educational Objectives for the Study of History: a suggested framework, London: Historical Association.
10.
Department of Education and Science (1975), A Language for Life, report of the committee of inquiry appointed by the Secretary of State for Education under the chairmanship of Alan Bullock, London: HMSO.
11.
Department of Education and Science (1985), History in the Primary and Secondary Years, London: HMSO.
12.
DoyleW.. (1983), ‘Academic work’,Review of Educational Research53(2), 159–99.
13.
DoyleW.. (1986), ‘Content representations in teachers’ definitions of academic work’,Journal of Curriculum Studies18(4), 365–79.
14.
GarveyB., and KrugM.. (1977), Models of History Teaching in the Secondary School, London: Oxford University Press.
15.
GunningD.. (1983), ‘The history teacher and the problem of written language’, in FinesJ. (ed.), Teaching History, London: Holmes-McDougall.
16.
JohnsonD.. (1991), ‘The Effectiveness of a Genre-based Approach to Academic Writing’, unpublished Ph.D thesis, University of Bristol.
17.
Joint Matriculation Board (1987), Staged Assessments in Literacy, Manchester: JMB.
18.
KnightP.. (1991), ‘Teaching as exposure: the case of good practice in junior school history’,British Educational Research Journal17(2), 129–41.
MarshallH. H.. (1987), ‘Building a learning orientation’,Theory into Practice26, 8–14.
21.
MarshallH. H., and WeinsteinR. S.. (1982), Classroom Dimensions Observational System: a manual, Berkeley, Cal.: Department of Psychology, University of California.
22.
MarshallH. H., and WeinsteinR. S.. (1984), ‘Classroom factors affecting students’ self-evaluation: an instructional model’,Review of Educational Research54, 301–25.
23.
MarshallH. H., and WeinsteinR. S.. (1985), ‘“It's not how much brains you've got, it's how you use it”: a comparison of classrooms expected to enhance or undermine students’ self-evaluations’, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, April.
24.
MeeceJ. L., and BlumenfeldP. C.. (1987), ‘Elementary School Children's Motivational Orientation and Patterns of Engagement in Classroom Activities’, paper presented to the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, D.C., August.
25.
RossR. P.. (1984), ‘Classroom segments: the structure of school time’, in AndersonL. W. (ed.), Time and School Learning: theory, research and practice, London: Croom Helm.
26.
SamuelR.. (1989), ‘Returning to History’, paper delivered at the ‘History, the Nation and the Schools’ conference, Ruskin College, Oxford, 19 May.
27.
ShemiltD.. (1980), History 13-16: an evaluative study, London: Holmes-McDougall.