ArlinM.. (1979), ‘Teacher transitions can disrupt time flow in classrooms’,American Educational Research Journal16, 42–56
3.
BeamerD. W.. (1983), ‘The effects of an inservice education program on the academic learning time of selected students in physical education’,Dissertation Abstracts International43, 2593A. (University Microfilms No. DA 8300208.)
4.
BeckettK. D.. (1989), ‘The effects of motor appropriate engagement ALT–PE(M) on achievement in a badminton skill during an experimental teaching unit’,Physical Educator46(late winter), 36–40.
5.
BerlinerD. C.. (1979), ‘Tempus educare’, in PetersonP. L., and WalbergH. J. (eds.), Research on Teaching: concepts, findings and implications, Berkeley, Cal.: McCutchan.
6.
BirdwellD.. (1980), ‘The effects of modification of teacher behavior on the academic learning time of selected students in physical education’,Dissertation Abstracts International41, 1472A. (University Microfilms No. DEM80-22239.)
7.
BorgW. R., and GallM. D.. (1983), Educational Research, fourth edition, New York: Longman.
8.
BorgW. R., and AscioneF. R.. (1979), ‘Changing on-task, off-task disruptive pupil behaviour in elementary mainstreaming classrooms’,Journal of Educational Research72, 243–52.
9.
Canadian Red Cross Society Water Safety Service (1963), Instructors’ Guide and Reference.Toronto: Canadian Red Cross.
10.
Carreiro da CostaF., and PiéronM.. (1992), ‘Teaching effectiveness: comparison of more and less effective teachers in an experimental teaching unit’, in WilliamsT., AlmondL., and SparkesA. (eds.), Sport and Physical Activity, London: Spon.
11.
CohenL., and HollidayM.. (1982), Statistics for Social Scientists, London: Harper & Row.
FisherC. W., BerlinerD. C., FilbyN. N., MarliaveR., CahenL. S., and DishawM. M.. (1980), ‘Teaching behaviours, academic learning time and student achievement: an overview,’ in DenhamE., and LeibermanL. (eds.), Time to Learn, Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Education.
14.
GaltonM.. (1987), ‘Structured observation’, in DunkinM. J. (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Teaching and Teacher Education, Oxford: Pergamon Press.
15.
GodboutP., BrunelleJ., and TousignantM.. (1987), ‘Who benefits from passing through the program?’ in BarretteG. T., FeingoldR. S., ReesC. R., and PiéronM. (eds.), Myths, Models and Methods in Sport Pedagogy, Champaign, Ill.: Human Kinetics.
16.
GrahamG., SoaresP., and HarringtonW.. (1983), ‘Experienced teachers’ effectiveness with intact classes: an ETU study’,Journal of Teaching in Physical Education2(2), 3–14.
17.
GrahamK. C.. (1987), ‘A description of academic work and student performance during a middle school volleyball unit’,Journal of Teaching in Physical Education7(1), 22–37.
18.
GrantB. C., BallardK. D., and GlynnT. L.. (1989), ‘Student behaviour in physical education lessons: a comparison among student achievement groups’,Journal of Educational Research82, 216–26.
19.
HardyC. A.. (1987), Handbook for the Teacher of Swimming, London: Pelham Books.
20.
ManciniV. H., and WuestD. A.. (1987), ‘Coaches’ interactions and their high- and low-skilled athletes’ ALT–PE: a systematic perspective’, in BarretteG. T., FeingoldR. S., ReesC. R., and PiéronM. (eds.), Myths, Models and Methods in Sport Pedagogy, Champaign, Ill.: Human Kinetics.
21.
ManciniV. H., WuestD. A., VantineK. W., and ClarkE. K.. (1984), ‘The use of instruction and supervision in interaction on burned-out teachers: its effect on teaching behaviors, level of burnout, and academic learning time’,Journal of Teaching in Physical Education3(2), 29–46.
22.
McLeishJ., HoweB., and JacksonJ.. (1981), Effective Teaching in Physical Education, Victoria, B.C.: University of Victoria.
23.
PaeseP. C.. (1986), ‘Comparison of teacher behaviour and criterion process variables in an experimental teaching unit (ETU) taught by pre-service physical education majors at the entrance and exit levels’, in PiéronM., and GrahamG. (eds.), Sport Pedagogy6, 71–6. Champaign, Ill.: Human Kinetics.
24.
ParkerM., and O'SullivanM.. (1983), ‘Modifying ALT–PE for game play contexts and other reflections’,Journal of Teaching Physical Education, Summer Monograph No. 1, 2, 8–10.
25.
PiéronM.. (1983), ‘Teacher and pupil behaviour and the interaction process in PE classes’, in R. Telema, V. Varstala, J. Tiainen, L. Laakso and T. Haajanen, Research in School Physical Education: reports of physical culture and health, 1983, No. 38, Jyväskyla, Finland: Foundation for the Promotion of Physical Culture and Health.
26.
PiéronM., and HaanJ.. (1979), ‘Interactions between Teacher and Students in a Physical Education Setting: observation of student behaviours’, paper presented at the International Council of Health, Physical Education and Recreation Congress, Kiel, FRG, July.
27.
PiéronM., and HaanJ.. (1980), ‘Pupils’ activities, time on task and behaviours in high school physical education teaching’,Bulletin of the Fédération Internationale d'Education Physique50(3-4), 62–8.
28.
PhillipsD. A., and CarlisleC.. (1983), ‘A comparison of physical education teachers categorized as most and least effective’,Journal of Teaching in Physical Education2(3), 55–67.
29.
PlacekJ., SilvermanS., DoddsP., ShuteS., and RifeF.. (1982), ‘Active learning time in a traditional elementary physical education setting: a descriptive analysis’,Journal of Classroom Interaction17(2), 41–7.
30.
RandallL. E., and ImwoldC. H.. (1989), ‘The effect of an intervention on academic learning time provided by pre-service physical education teachers’,Journal of Teaching in Physical Education8(4), 271–9.
31.
RateR. A.. (1980), ‘A Descriptive Analysis of Academic Learning Time and Coaching Behaviours in Inter-scholastic Athletic Practices’, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Columbus: Ohio State University.
32.
RinkJ. E.. (1985), Teaching Physical Education for Learning, St Louis, Mo.: Times Mirror/Mosby.
33.
RusnockM., and BrandlerN.. (1979), ‘Time off-task: implications for learning’, paper presented to the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
34.
SiedentopD., BirdwellD., and MetzlerM.. (1979), ‘Academic Learning Time: a process approach to measuring teacher effectiveness in physical education’, research symposium presented at the National Convention of the AAHPER, New Orleans, La., March.
35.
SilvermanS.. (1985), ‘Relationship of engagement and practice trials to student achievement’,Journal of Teaching in Physical Education5(1), 13–21.
36.
SilvermanS.. (1991), ‘Research on Teaching in Physical Education’,Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport62(4), 352–64.
37.
SilvermanS., DoddsP., PlacekJ., ShuteS., and RifeF.. (1984), ‘Academic learning time in elementary physical education (ALT–PE) for student sub-groups and instructional activity units’,Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport55(4), 365–70.
38.
SmytheW. J.. (1987), ‘Time’, in DunkinM. J. (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Teaching and Teacher Education, Oxford: Pergamon.
39.
TelamaR., VarstalaV., Heikinaro-JohanssonP., and UtriainenJ.. (1987), in BarretteG. T., FeingoldR. S., ReesC. R., and PiéronM. (eds.), Myths, Models and Methods in Sport Pedagogy, Part III, Champaign, Ill.: Human Kinetics.
40.
TinningR.. (1987), Improving Teaching in Physical Education, Geelong, Vict.: Deakin University Press.
41.
UnderwoodG. L.. (1988), Teaching and Learning in Physical Education: a social psychological perspective, London: Falmer Press.
42.
WeckelH.. (1966), ‘Über die Leistungsentwicklung von Anfängern im Schwimmunterricht des drei Schuljars unter dem Aspekt verschiedener Schwimmarten’,Gymnasium3(1), 18–20 (translated by J. O. Hardy).
43.
WhaleyG.. (1980), ‘The effects of daily monitoring and feedback to teachers and students on academic learning time – physical education’,Dissertation Abstracts International41, 1477A. (University Microfilms No. DEM80-22365.)
44.
WhitingH. T. A.. (1970), Teaching the Persistent Non-swimmer, London: Bell.