Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 1992-5
The relations between prior knowledge,course achievement and cognitive structure changes of prospective teachers following a course in educational psychology
AusubelD. P., NovakJ. D., and HanesianH.. (1978), Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View, 2nd edn, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
2.
ChampagneA. B., GunstoneR., and KlopferL. E.. (1982), ‘Cognitive research and the design of science instruction’,Educational Psychologist, 17, 31–53.
3.
CollinsA.. (1977), ‘Processes in acquiring knowledge’, in AndersonR. C., SpiroR. J., and MontagueW. E. (eds), Schooling and the Acquisition of Knowledge, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4.
FillenbaumS., and RapoportA.. (1971), Structures in the Subjective Lexicon, New York: Academic Press.
5.
GorodetskyM.. (1985), personal communication.
6.
GorodetskyM., and HozR.. (1985), ‘Changes in the group cognitive structure of some chemical equilibrium concepts following a university course in general chemistry’,Science Education, 69, 185–99.
7.
HambletonR. K., and SheehanD. S.. (1977), ‘On the evaluation of higher-order science instructional objectives’,Science Education, 61, 307–15.
8.
HarasymP., and PrechtD.. (1971), ‘Wiley's Latent Partition Analysis’ technical report, University of Alberta.
9.
KozminskyE., and HozR.. (1986), ‘Use of Reference-Latent Categories to Evaluate Cognitive Structure Changes Following Instruction’, technical report, Ben-Gurion University.
10.
RumelhartD. E., and OrtonyA.. (1977), ‘Representation of knowledge’, in AndersonR. C., SpiroR. J., and MontagueW. E. (eds), Schooling and the Acquisition of Knowledge, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11.
SchallertD. L.. (1982), ‘The significance of knowledge: a synthesis of research related to schema theory’, in OttoW., and WhiteS. (eds), Reading Expository Material, New York: Academic Press.
12.
WileyD. E.. (1967), ‘Latent partition analysis’,Psychometrika, 32, 183–93.