AdarL., and FoxS.. (1978), An Analysis of the Content and Use of a History Curriculum, Jerusalem: School of Education, The Hebrew University.
2.
AsenugaJ. I.. (1971), ‘Our laboratories are full of mess’,Journal of Science Teachers’ Association of Nigeria, 10, 61–72.
3.
BajahS. T.. (1977), ‘Preparation of the secondary school teacher of the physical sciences for the African environment’,West African Journal of Education, 29, 85–96.
4.
Ben PertzM., and KremerL.. (1979), ‘Curriculum implementation and the nature of curriculum materials’,Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1(2), 247–56.
5.
BrownS., McIntyreD., DreverF., and DavisK. J.. (1976), Innovations: Teachers’ Views, Stirling Educational Monographs No. 2, Department of Education, Stirling University, 1976.
6.
EbirimaO. A.. (1983), ‘A Survey of Physics Teaching in Bendel State, Nigeria’, unpublished M.Ed. thesis, University of Ibadan.
7.
WoleFalayajo, BajahS. T., and YoloyeE. A.. (1976), Midwest Primary Science Project Evaluation Report, International Centre for Educational Evaluation, Institute of Education, University of Ibadan, April, mimeograph.
8.
FurstN.. (1976), ‘The effect of training in interaction analysis on the behaviour of student-teachers in secondary schools’, in AmidonE. J., and HoughJ. B. (eds), Interaction Analysis, Theory, Research and Application, New York: Addison Wesley, pp. 315–28.
9.
Kalamanthan (1971), ‘The status of science teaching in the secondary schools of Northern Nigeria’,Journal of Science Teachers Association of Nigeria, 10, 42–3.
10.
KirkS.. (1976), ‘Elementary school student teachers and interaction analysis’, in AmidonE. S., and HoughJ. B. (eds), Interaction Analysis: Theory, Research and Application, New York: Addison Wesley, pp. 299–306.
11.
ObanyaP. A. I., and OsafehintiI.. (1985), ‘Teachers’ perception of learner characteristics and classroom interaction’,Journal of Research in Curriculum, 3(1), 51–7.
12.
OdubunmiO.. (1986), ‘Preservice science and technical teachers’ attitude towards the teaching of integrated science and teaching methods employed by them’,Journal of the Science Teachers Association of Nigeria, 24(1) & (2), April, 209-17.
13.
OgunniyiM. B.. (1977), ‘Status of practical work in ten selected secondary schools in Kwara state’,Journal of Science Teachers Association of Nigeria, 16(1), 36.
14.
OgunniyiM. B.. (1982), ‘An exploratory study of the nature of science teaching in Nigerian secondary schools’,‘African Journal of Educational Research’, 4(1) & (2), 81-96.
15.
OkpalaP. N., and OnochaC. O.. (1988), ‘Classroom interaction patterns of physics teachers trainees in Nigerian colleges of education’,Physics Education, 23(6), 288–90.
16.
OludotunJ. S.. (1981), ‘The Performance of Selected Physics Teachers Relative to the Objectives of the CESAC Programme’, unpublished M.Ed, thesis, University of Ibadan.
17.
OnochaC. O., and OkpalaP. N.. (1986), ‘Family environmental correlates of science achievement of pupils in primary schools’,Journal of the Science Teachers Association of Nigeria, 23, 150–5.
18.
YoloyeE. A.. (1970), ‘A study of teacher response to training on APSP materials’,Journal of the Science Teachers Association of Nigeria, 9(1), 21–5.
19.
YoloyeE. A.. (1971), Evaluation for Innovation: African Primary Science Program, Evaluation Report, Newton, Mass.: Educational Development Centre, mimeograph.
20.
ZahnR. D.. (1976), ‘The use of interaction analysis in supervising Student-teachers’, in AmidonE. J., and HoughJ. B. (eds), Interaction Analysis Theory, Research and Application, New York: Addison Wesley, pp. 295–8.