BarkerR. G.. (ed.), (1963), The Stream of Behaviour - Exploration of its Structure and Content, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
2.
BarkerR. G.. (1964), ‘Observation of behaviour: ecological approaches’,Journal of Mt Sinai Hospital, 31.(4), 268–84.
3.
BarkerR. G.. (1968), Ecological Psychology, Stanford University Press.
4.
BellackA. A., KliebardH. M., HymanR. T., and SmithF. L.. (1966), The Language of the Classroom, New York: Columbia University Teachers College Press.
5.
BiddleB. J.. (1967), ‘Methods and concepts in classroom research’,Review of Educational Research, 37, 337–57.
6.
BiddleB. J.. (1970), Role Theory, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
7.
CambourneB. L.. (1971), ‘A Naturalistic Study of Language Performance in Grade 1 Rural and Urban School Children’, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Townsville: James Cook University.
8.
ClarkC. M.. (1980), ‘Choice of a model for research on teacher thinking’,Curriculum Studies, 12(1), 41–7.
9.
DunkinM. J., and BiddleB. J.. (1974), The Study of Teaching, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
10.
FleetA., DunkinM. J., and LevisD. S.. (1981), Verbal Interaction between Student-Teachers and Cooperating-Teachers: the Development of an Observational Instrument, report of a study funded by ERDC, Sydney: Centre for Teaching and Learning, University ofSydney and School of Education, Macquarie University.
11.
GrimshawA. D.. (1982), ‘Comprehensive discourse analysis: an instance of professional peer interaction’,Language in Society, 2, 15–47.
12.
GronnP. C.. (1981), ‘Accomplishing the doing of school administration: talk as the work’, paper presented at the annual conference of the Australian Communication Association, Sydney.
13.
HallidayM. A. K.. (1967), Intonation and Grammar in British English, The Hague: Mouton.
14.
HawkinsW. A.. (1970), Naturalistic Methods in Classroom Research, paper presented to Section 22 of the 42nd Congress of ANZAAS, Port Moresby.
15.
HawkinsW. A.. (1980), personal communication to AF.
16.
HoganD. P.. (1970), A Structural Approach to the Analysis of Classroom Behaviour, paper presented to Section 22 of the 42nd Congress of ANZAAS, Port Moresby.
17.
Le GuinU.. (1974), The Dispossessed, Penguin.
18.
MacDonaldB.. (1980?), ‘The portrayal of persons as evaluation data’, Politics and Ethics of Case Study, Vol. 7 of Case Study Methods, Deakin University, pp. 27–42.
19.
PikeK. L.. (1967), Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of the Structure of Human Behaviour, Paris: Mouton and Co.
20.
SimonA., and BoyerE. G.. (eds), (1974), Mirrors for Behaviour III: An Anthology of Observation Instruments, Pennsylvania: Communication Materials Center.
21.
SinclairJ.McH., and CoulthardR. M.. (1975), Towards an Analysis of Discourse - the English used by Teachers and Pupils, Oxford University Press.
22.
SmithB. O., and MeuxB. O.. (1962), A Study of the Logic of Teaching, University of Illinois Bureau of Educational Research.
23.
StenhouseL.. (1980?), ‘Case study in educational research and evaluation’,An Overview, Vol. 1 of Case Study Methods, Geelong: Deakin University, pp. 15–38.
24.
TabaH.. (1966), Teaching Strategies and Cognitive Functioning in Elementary School Children, Co-operative Research Project No. 2404, San Francisco State College.
25.
WalkerR.. (1980), ‘The conduct of educational case studies: ethics, theory and procedures’, in DockrellW. B., and HamiltonD. (eds), Rethinking Educational Research, Hodder & Stoughton.
26.
WardhaughR.. (1985), How Conversation Works, Basil Blackwell.