Improving the supervision of postgraduate students

Baddeley A. . (1979). ‘Is the British Ph.D. system obsolete?’ Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 32, 129–31.

Blumberg A. . (1973). Supervisors and Teachers: a Private Cold War. Berkeley, California: McCutchan Publishing Co.

Blumberg A. . (1978). ‘Supervision as interpersonal intervention’. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 13, 1, 23–32.

Blumberg A. , and Weber W. A. . (1968). ‘Teacher morale as a function of perceived supervisor behavioural style’. Journal of Educational Research, 62, 109–13.

British Sociological Association (1978). ‘Guidelines for postgraduate supervision’. Network (Newsletter of the British Sociological Association), 10, 8–9.

Carter C. . (1980). Higher Education for the Future. Oxford: Blackwell.

Cook M. C. F. . (1980). ‘The role of the academic supervisor for dissertations in science and science-related primary degrees’. Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 5, No. 2, 173–85.

Copeland W. D. , and Atkinson D. R. . (1978). ‘Student teachers’ perceptions of directive and non-directive supervisory behaviour’. Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 71, No. 3, 123–26.

Elton L. R. B. . (1981). ‘Can universities change?’ Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 6, No. 1, 23–33.

Fraser G. W. . (1977). ‘Approaches to supervision in training’. RAF Education Bulletin, 14, 52–65.

Frymier J. R. . (1969). ‘The supervisor and his professional identity’, in The Supervisor: new demands, new dimensions (ed. Lucio W. H. .). New York: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development Commission.

Lewin K. . (1961). ‘Quasi-stationary social equilibria and the problem of permanent change’, in The Planning of Change ( Bennis W. G. , Benne K. D. , and Chin R. ., eds.). New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston.

Low A. . (1976), in Report of four postgraduate education seminars. Office for Research in Academic Methods, Australian National University.

Lucio W. H. , and McNeil J. D. . (1969). Supervision: a synthesis of thought and action. New York: McGraw-Hill.

McGuiness D. . (1974). ‘The Ph.D.'s dilemma; a reply to Dr. Wason’. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 27, 452–4.

Marris P. . (1964). The Experience of Higher Education. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Marsh A. . (1972). Postgraduate Students’ Assessment of their Social Science Training. SSRC Survey Unit, Occasional Paper No. 2. London: SSRC.

Mayhew L. B. , and Ford P. J. . (1974). Reform in Graduate and Professional Education. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

Oliva P. F. . (1976). Supervision for Today's Schools. New York: Thomas Y. Cromwell Co.

Pascal C. E. . (1977). ‘Evaluating academic functions outside the classroom’, in If Teaching is Important … (ed. Knapper C. K. ). Monograph of Canadian Association of University Teachers. Canada: Clarke Irwin.

Rudd E. . (1975). The Highest Education. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Rudd E. , and Hatch S. . (1968). ‘Graduate study and after’. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.

Rugg E. A. , and Norris R. C. . (1975). ‘Students’ ratings of individualised faculty supervision: description and evaluation’. American Educational Research Journal, 12, 1, 41–53.

Salek C. J. . (1975). ‘Helping teachers vs. evaluating teachers’. National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, 59, 34–38.

Smith R. V. . (1980). Development and Management of Research Groups: a Guide for University Researchers. London: University of Texas Press.

Tucker A. . (1964). Factors related to Attrition among Doctoral Students. U.S. Office of Education Cooperative Research Project 1146. Michigan: Michigan State University Press.

Welsh J. M. . (1978). ‘The supervision of postgraduate research students’. Research in Education, May 1978, 77–86.

Welsh J. M. . (1979). The First Year of Postgraduate Research Study. University of Surrey: Society for Research into Higher Education.

Williams W. D. . (1971). ‘Graduate—supervisor relationships’. Notes on Higher Education. Higher Education Research Unit, Monash University, Australia.

Young J. M. , and Heichberger R. L. . (1975). ‘Teachers’ perceptions of an effective school supervision and evaluation program’. Education, 96, 10–19.