ChananG. (1974), ‘Objectives in the humanities’,Educational Research, 16, pp. 198–205.
4.
EbelR. L. (1971), ‘Criterion-referenced measurements: Limitations’,School Review, 79, pp. 282–8.
5.
EbelR. L. (1973), ‘The future of measurement of abilities, II’,Educational Researcher, March, pp. 5–12.
6.
GuyW.,and ChambersP. (1973), ‘Public examinations and pupils’ rights’.Cambridge Journal of Education, 3, pp. 83–9.
7.
GuyW. (1974), ‘Public examinations and pupils’ rights revisited’,Cambridge Journal of Education, 4, pp. 47–50.
8.
HamiltonE. R. (1929), The art of interrogation.London: Kegan Paul.
9.
HarveyT. J. (1975), ‘Some thoughts on norm-referenced and criterion-referenced measures’,Research in Education, 13, pp. 79–86.
10.
HieronymousA. N. (1971), ‘Today's testing: what do we know how to do?Proceedings of the 1971 Invitational Conference on Testing Problems, pp. 57–68. Princeton, N. J.: Educational Testing Service.
11.
MessickS. (1974), ‘The standard problem: meaning and values in measurement and evaluation’.Research Bulletin, 74–44.
12.
ShayerM. (1972), ‘Conceptual demands in the Nuffield O-level physics course’,Schools Science Review, 54, pp. 26–34.
13.
ThyneJ. M. (1974), Principles of examining.London: University of London Press Ltd.
14.
WardJ. (1970), ‘On the concept of criterion-referenced measurement’,British Journal of Educational Psychology, 40, pp. 314–23.
15.
WoodR. (1973), ‘Response-contingent testing’,Review of Educational Research, 43, pp. 529–44.
16.
WringeC. (1973), ‘Pupils’ rights and examinations’,Cambridge Journal of Education, 3, pp. 193–202.
17.
WringeC. (1974), ‘Pupils’ rights and examinations—some further considerations’,Cambridge Journal of Education, 4, pp. 169–73.