Council for Scientific Policy (1968), Enquiry into the flow of candidates in science and technology into higher education (The Dainton Report), HMSO Cmnd. 3541.
HutchisonD. A. (1972), ‘Discouraged women’, Higher Education Review, IV, pp, 69–70.
8.
HutchisonD. A., “The influence of the university on school curriculum: the context of subject choice” (forthcoming).
9.
JonesC. L., LittlejohnG. M., and McPhersonA. F. (1974), ‘Predicting science-based study at the university: some methods and their implications for planning’,J. Royal Statist. Soc., Series A, CXXXVII, Part 1.
10.
JonesC. L., and McPhersonA. F. (1972), ‘Implications of non-response to postal surveys for the development of nationally-based data on flows out of educational systems’, Scott. Educ. Studies, IV, pp. 28–38.
11.
McPhersonA. F. (1973), Some methodological and substantive conclusions from a longitudinal study of the educational and occupational behaviour of Scots entering tertiary education’,Sociological Microjournal, University of Copenhagen.
12.
MusgroveF., and BatcockA. (1969), ‘Aspects of the swing from science’, Brit. J. Ed. Psych., XXXIX, pp. 320–35.
13.
PhillipsC. M. (1969), Changes in subject choice at school and university, L.S.E. Research Monograph 1. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
14.
PontH. B., and ButcherH. J. (1968), ‘Choice of course and subject specialisation in seventeen Scottish secondary schools’, Scott. Educ. Studies, I, pp. 9–16.
15.
SonquistJ. A. (1970), Multivariate model building: the validation of a search strategy.Ann Arbor: Institute of Social Research, University of Michigan.
16.
SonquistJ. A., BakerE. L., and MorganJ. N. (1971), Searching for structure (Alias AID III).Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
17.
UCCA (1971), Eighth Report, 1969-70.Cheltenham: Universities Central Council on Admissions.