AchesonK. (1964) ‘The effects of feedback from television recordings and three types of supervisory treament on selected teacher behaviour’. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Ann Arbor, Mich.: University Microfilms, No. 64-13542.
2.
AllenD. W.,and FortuneJ. C. (1966) ‘An analysis of microteaching: new procedure in teacher education’ in Microteaching: a description.Stanford University.
3.
AllenD. W.,and RyanK. A. (1969) Microteaching.Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
4.
AllenD. W., RyanK. A., BushR. N.,and CooperJ. M. (1969) Teaching skills for elementary and secondary school teacher.New York: General Learning Corporation.
5.
AnnettJ. (1969) Feedback and human behaviour.Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
6.
BanduraA.,and McDonaldF. J. (1963) ‘The influence of social reinforcement and behaviour of models in shaping children's moral judgements.’Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,67, 274–81.
7.
BanduraA.,and WaltersR. H. (1963) Social learning and personality development.New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
8.
BanduraA., RossD.,and RossS. (1963) ‘Transmission of aggression through imitation of aggressive models.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,66, 3–11.
9.
BorgW. R., KelleyM. L., LangerP.,and GallM. (1970) The minicourse: a microteaching approach to teacher education.London: Collier-MacMillan.
10.
ClausK. E. (1969) ‘Effects of modelling and feedback variables on questioning skills.’ Technical Report No. 6, Stanford: Center for Research and Development in Teaching.
11.
FortuneJ. C., CooperJ. M.,and AllenD. W. (1967) ‘The Stanford summer microteaching clinic, 1965.’Journal of Teacher Education,18, 389–93.
12.
KoranJ. J. (1968) ‘The relative effectiveness of imitation versus problem-solving in the acquisition of a complex teaching skill.’ Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Ann Arbor, Mich.: University Microfilms, No. 68-11314.
13.
McKnight, and Baral (ed.) (1969) ‘Microteaching and the technical skills of teaching: a bibliography of research and development at Stanford University, 1963-69.’ Research and Development Memorandum No. 48, Stanford: Center for Research and Development in Teaching.
14.
McDonaldF. J., AllenD. W.,and SeidmanE. (1967) ‘Televised models for teacher training.’ Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, February.
15.
McDonaldF. J.,and AllenD. W. (1967) ‘Training effects of feedback and modelling procedures on teacher performance.’ Final report of United States Office of Education project OE-6-10-078, Stanford University (EO 017 985). Also issued as Technical Report No. 3, Stanford Center for Research and Development in Teaching.
16.
OliveroJ. L. (1964) ‘Video recordings as a substitute for live observations in teacher education.’ Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Ann Arbor, Mich.: University Microfilms, No. 65-2866.
17.
OrmeM. E. J. (1966) ‘The effects of modelling and feedback variables on the acquisition of a complex teaching strategy.’ Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University. Ann Arbor, Mich.: University Microfilms, No. 67-4417 (ED 014 441).
18.
SalomonG.,and McDonaldF. J. (1969) ‘Pre- and post-test reactions to self-viewing one's teaching performance on videotape.’ Research and Development Memorandum No. 44, Stanford: Center for Research and Development in Teaching.
19.
SheffieldF. O. (1961) ‘Theoretical considerations in the learning complex sequential tasks from demonstration and practice’ in LumsdaineA.A. (ed.), Student response in programmed instruction.Washington: National Research Council, 117–40.
20.
WardB. E. (1968) ‘A survey of microteaching in secondary education programmes of all NCATE-accredited colleges and universities.’ Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of South Dakota.
21.
YoungD. B. (1967) ‘The effectiveness of self-instruction in teacher education using modelling and videotape feedback.’ Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University. Ann Arbor, Mich.: University Microfilms, No. 68-6518 (ED 019 883).
