BeardR. M. (1967) Research into teaching methods in higher education, London: Society for Research into Higher Education Ltd.
2.
Committee of Vice-chancellors and Principals of the Universities of Great Britain and Ireland (1965) Report of a sub-committee on university entrance requirements, London.
3.
Council for Scientific Policy (1968) Enquiry into the flow of candidates in science and technology into higher education (the Dainton report), London: HMSO.
4.
CottrellT. L. (1962) ‘Effect of size of tutorial group on teaching efficiency’, University of Edinburgh Gazette, 33, 20–1.
5.
De CeccoP. (1964) ‘Class size and co-ordinated instruction’, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 34, 65–74.
6.
Department of Education and Science (1967) Statistics of education, 1966: vol. 1, Schools, London: HMSO.
7.
Headmasters’ Association (1968) The sixth form of the future, London.
8.
McKeachieW. J. (1966) ‘Research into teaching: the gap between theory and practice’, in Improving college teaching, New York: American Council on Education.
9.
MillerP. S. (1929) ‘A quantitative investigation of the efficiency of instruction in high-school physics’, Journal of educational research, 19, 2, 119–27.
10.
Ministry of Education (1959-60) 15 to 18, report of the Central Advisory Council for Education (the Crowther report),London: HMSO.
11.
National Advisory Council of Education for Industry and Commerce (1966) The size of classes and approval of further education courses, report of the Committee on Technical College Resources (the Pilkington report), London: HMSO.
12.
RosenthalR. (1968) ‘Weighing the effect of a smile’, New Society, 12, 319, 666–9.
13.
Schools Council (1966) Sixth form curriculum and examinations, working paper No. 5, London: HMSO.