This paper aims to capture the digital imaginaries of Hungarian schools through the lens of digital utopianism as a theoretical framework. Employing a qualitative research approach and semi-structured interviews, this study contributes to the body of literature concerning organizational and policy-level educational management. It investigates utopian and dystopian visions of digitalized schools within the Hungarian education system, featuring participants comprising school leaders, teachers, and administrative staff drawn from five institutions, offering either general or vocational education, representing diverse ownership structures, including state and religious ownership. The study highlights prominent themes of the imaginaries, such as funding and infrastructure, equity, misuse, and social and pedagogical relations and suggests further research directions and methodologies applicable in this field.
British Educational Research Association [BERA] (2018) Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research. 4th edition. London: British Educational Research Association [BERA].
ConeLBrøggerKBerghmansM, et al. (2022) Pandemic acceleration: COVID-19 and the emergency digitalization of European education. European Educational Research Journal21(5): 845–868. DOI: 10.1177/14749041211041793.
4.
DaiYXHaoST (2018) Transcending the opposition between techno-utopianism and techno-dystopianism. Technology in Society53: 9–13. DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.11.001.
5.
DenzinNKLincolnYS (2011) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
DickelSSchrapeJF (2017) The logic of digital utopianism. NanoEthics11(1): 47–58. DOI: 10.1007/s11569-017-0285-6.
7.
DimopoulosKKoutsampelasCTsatsaroniA (2021) Home schooling through online teaching in the era of COVID-19: exploring the role of home-related factors that deepen educational inequalities across European societies. European Educational Research Journal20(4): 479–497. DOI: 10.1177/14749041211023331.
European Commission (2019) Executive Summary of 2nd Survey of Schools: ICT in Education. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. DOI: 10.2759/225159.
10.
FacerKeri (2011) Learning Futures: Education, Technology and Social Change. Routledge.
11.
FrohnJ (2021) Troubled schools in troubled times: how COVID-19 affects educational inequalities and what measures can be taken. European Educational Research Journal20(5): 667–683. DOI: 10.1177/14749041211020974.
12.
GaudetSRobertD (2018) A Journey through Qualitative Research: From Design to Reporting. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd. DOI: 10.4135/9781529716733.
13.
GruszczynskaAMerchantGPountneyR (2013) “Digital futures in teacher education”: exploring open approaches towards digital literacy | electronic journal of e-learning. Electronic Journal of e-Learning11(3): 193–206. https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejel/article/view/1669.
14.
GulsonKNWebbPT (2017) Mapping an emergent field of “computational education policy”: policy rationalities, prediction and data in the age of Artificial Intelligence. Research in Education98(1): 14–26. DOI: 10.1177/0034523717723385.
HammondM (2014) Introducing ICT in schools in england: rationale and consequences. British Journal of Educational Technology45(2): 191–201. DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12033.
17.
HedleyCNEllsworthNJ (1992) What‘s new in software? computers and educational futures. Reading & Writing Quarterly8(2): 243–250. DOI: 10.1080/0748763920080207.
18.
HøydalØSHaldarM (2022) A tale of the digital future: analyzing the digitalization of the Norwegian education system. Critical Policy Studies16(4): 460–477. DOI: 10.1080/19460171.2021.1982397.
19.
HubermanAMMilesMB (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications Inc.
20.
JasanoffS (2015) Future imperfect: science, technology, and the imaginations of modernity. In: JasanoffSKimS-H (eds) Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–33.
21.
JohnstonKMcGarrO (2022) Digital education futures in Irish educational policy: tempering commercial influence through an exploration of emerging ethical, environmental and educational realities. Irish Educational Studies41(1): 135–149. DOI: 10.1080/03323315.2021.2022516.
22.
JordánZ (2019) Az állami és egyházi fenntartású finanszírozásáról. Új Köznevelés75(9–10): 14–17.
23.
KeaneTKeaneW (2020) A vision of the digital future - government funding as a catalyst for 1 to 1 computing in schools. Education and Information Technologies25(2): 845–861. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-019-09988-y.
24.
KearneyMSchuckSBurdenK (2022) Digital pedagogies for future school education: promoting inclusion. Irish Educational Studies41(1): 117–133. DOI: 10.1080/03323315.2021.2024446.
LivingstoneS (2012) Critical reflections on the benefits of ICT in education. Oxford Review of Education38(1): 9–24. DOI: 10.1080/03054985.2011.577938.
MateuMCoboCMoravecJ (2018) Plan Ceibal 2020: future scenarios for technology and education—the case of the Uruguayan public education system. European Journal of Forest Research6(6): 6–12. DOI: 10.1186/s40309-018-0134-z.
29.
McGarrOEngenBK (2021) By-passing teachers in the marketing of digital technologies: the synergy of educational technology discourse and new public management practices. Learning, Media and Technology47(4): 440–455. DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2021.2010092.
MorozovE (2013) Teo Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism. New York, NY: PublicAffairs.
32.
NilsberthMLiljekvistYOlin-SchellerC, et al. (2021) Digital teaching as the new normal? Swedish upper secondary teachers’ experiences of emergency remote teaching during the COVID-19 crisis. European Educational Research Journal20(4): 442–462. DOI: 10.1177/14749041211022480.
33.
OssewaardeMGülençE (2020) National Varieties of Artificial. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society, pp. 53–61.
34.
PéteriGSzilágyiB (2022) Egyházak a köznevelési költségvetésben. Education31(3): 461–478. DOI: 10.1556/2063.31.2022.3.8.
35.
PetterssonF (2018) On the issues of digital competence in educational contexts – a review of literature. Education and Information Technologies23(3): 1005–1021. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-017-9649-3.
36.
PetterssonF (2021) Understanding digitalization and educational change in school by means of activity theory and the levels of learning concept. Education and Information Technologies26(1): 187–204.
37.
PiconA (2003) Utopian socialism and social science. In: PorterTMRossD (eds) Cambridge History of Science. Suite N Hauppauge, NY: The Modern Social Sciences, vol. 7, pp. 71–82.
38.
RadóP (2022) Közoktatás És Politika. Magyarország 2010-2022. Budapest, Hungary: Noran Libro.
39.
RahmL (2021) Education, automation and AI: a genealogy of alternative futures. In: Learning, Media and Technology. Oxfordshire: Routledge. DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2021.1977948.
40.
RasaTLahertoA (2022) Young people’s technological images of the future: implications for science and technology education. European Journal of Forest Research10(4): 4–15. DOI: 10.1186/s40309-022-00190-x.
41.
RensfeldtABPlayer-KoroC (2020) “Back to the future”: socio-technical imaginaries in 50 years of school digitalization curriculum reforms. Seminar.net16(2): 20. DOI: 10.7577/seminar.4048.
42.
SaariASänttiJ (2018) The rhetoric of the “digital leap” in Finnish educational policy documents. European Educational Research Journal17(3): 442–457. DOI: 10.1177/1474904117721373.
43.
SaldañaJ (2013) The coding manual for qualitative researchers. In: Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal. 2nd edition. London: Sage Publications Ltd. DOI: 10.1108/qrom-08-2016-1408.
44.
SchrapeJF (2019) The promise of technological decentralization. A brief reconstruction. Society56(1): 31–37. DOI: 10.1007/s12115-018-00321-w.
45.
SchuckSAubussonP (2010) Educational scenarios for digital futures. Learning, Media and Technology35(3): 293–305. DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2010.509351.
46.
SullivanEV (1983) Computers, culture, and educational futures: a critical appraisal. Interchange14(3): 17–26. DOI: 10.1007/BF01810467.
47.
TextorRB (1985) Anticipatory anthropology and the telemicroelectronic revolution: a preliminary report from silicon valley. Anthropology and Education Quarterly16(1): 3–30.
48.
WebsterMD (2016) Examining philosophy of technology using grounded theory methods. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung17(2): 1–21.
49.
WebsterMD (2017) Philosophy of technology assumptions in educational technology leadership. Educational Technology & Society20(1): 25–36.
50.
WilliamsonB (2016a) Digital education governance : an introduction. European Educational Research Journal15(1): 3–13. DOI: 10.1177/1474904115616630.
51.
WilliamsonB (2016b) Digital education governance : data visualization , predictive analytics , and “real-time” policy instruments. Journal of Education Policy31(2): 123–141. DOI: 10.1080/02680939.2015.1035758.
52.
WilliamsonB (2017) Learning in the “platform society”: disassembling an educational data assemblage. Research in Education98(1): 59–82. DOI: 10.1177/0034523717723389.
53.
WilliamsonB (2018) Silicon startup schools: technocracy, algorithmic imaginaries and venture philanthropy in corporate education reform. Critical Studies in Education59(2): 218–236. DOI: 10.1080/17508487.2016.1186710.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
