New materialist and posthuman research methodologies are quickly gaining traction in educational research. According to its proponents, new materialism takes us to radically new places of praxis as it reconfigures central notions such as data, researcher positioning and critique. Here I consider how the notion of ‘data’ is invoked in an example of new materialist research by education scholars. Through this critique, I come to question the extent to which the approach constitutes a reconfiguration or whether, instead, it is continuous with some old and problematic tropes. I wonder if the positioning of data as supremely agentic elides the new materialist insistence on intra-action and discuss some of the implications of that including the depoliticisation it entails.
Adorno T (1964/1973) The Jargon of Authenticity (Trans. Tarnowski K and Will F). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
2.
AhmedS (2008) Imaginary prohibitions. Some preliminary remarks on the founding gestures of the ‘new materialism’. European Journal of Women’s Studies15(1): 23–29.
3.
BanerjeeBBlaiseM (2013) There’s something in the air: Becoming-with research practices. Cultural studies?Critical Methodologies13(4): 240–245.
4.
BaradK (2003) Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs28: 801–831.
5.
BjergHStaunæsD (2011) Self-management through shame – Uniting governmentality studies and the ‘affective turn.'. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization11(2): 138–156.
6.
BrownW (2006) Regulating Aversion: Tolerance in the Age of Identity and Empire, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
BruiningD (2016) Interrogating the founding gestures of the new materialism. Cultural Studies Review22(2): 21–40.
8.
ButlerJ (1993) Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’, New York: Routledge.
9.
CallonMLawJ (1982) On interests and their transformation: Enrolment and counter-enrolment. Social Studies of Science12: 615–625.
10.
CooleDHFrostS (2010) New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
11.
EzzyD (2002) Qualitative Analysis: Practice and Innovation, Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
12.
FlyvbjergB (2006) Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry12(2): 219–245.
13.
FoxNJAlldredP (2016) Sociology and the new Materialism: Theory, Research, Action, Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
14.
GerrardJRudolphSSriprakashA (2017) The Politics of Post-Qualitative Inquiry: History and Power. Qualitative Inquiry23(5): 384–394.
15.
GoughN (2016) Postparadigmatic materialisms: A ‘new movement of thought’ for outdoor environmental education research?Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education19(2): 51–65.
16.
HarawayD (1988) Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies14(3): 575–599.
17.
hooksB (1990) Marginality as site of resistance. In: FergusonRGeverMMinh-haTet al.(eds) Out There: Marginalization and Contemporary Cultures, Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, pp. 341–343.
18.
Koro-LjungbergMMacLureM (2013) Provocations, re-un-visions, death, and other possibilities of “data”. Cultural studies?Critical Methodologies13(4): 219–222.
19.
PaynePG (2016) What next? Post-critical materialisms in environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education47(2): 169–178.
20.
PetersenEB (2015) What crisis of representation? Challenging the realism of post-structuralist policy research in education. Critical Studies in Education56(1): 147–160.
21.
RekretP (2016) A critique of new materialism: Ethics and ontology. Subjectivity9(3): 225–245.
22.
Schroyer T (1964/1973) Foreword. In: Adorno T (ed.) The Jargon of Authenticity (Trans. Tarnowski K and Will F). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
23.
SchulzKA (2017) Decolonizing political ecology: Ontology, technology and ‘critical’ enchantment. Journal of Political Ecology24: 125–143.
24.
SpivakGC (1993) Can the subaltern speak? In: Williams P and Chrisman L (eds) Colonial Discourse and Postcolonial Theory: A Reader, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 66–111.
25.
St. Pierre EA, Jackson AY and Mazzei LA (2016) New empiricisms and new materialisms: Conditions for new inquiry. Cultural Studies-Critical Methodologies 16(2): 99–110.
26.
St. PierreEAJacksonAY (2014) Qualitative data analysis after coding. Qualitative Inquiry20(6): 715–719.
27.
SullivanN (2012) The somatechnics of perception and the matter of the non/human: A critical response to new materialism. European Journal of Women’s Studies19(3): 299–313.
28.
TaguchiHL (2012) A diffractive and Deleuzian approach to analysing interview data. Feminist Theory13(3): 265–281.
29.
Van der Tuin I and Dolphijn R (eds) (2012) New Materialism: Interviews & Cartographies. Ann Arbour, MI: Open Humanities Press.
30.
WilleyA (2016) A world of materialisms: Postcolonial feminist science studies and the new natural. Science, Technology and Human Values41(6): 991–1014.
