The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship of the 24 character strengths in Peterson and Seligman’s character strengths model with the 4 value changes in Beatrice Wright’s theory of disability acceptance. Two hundred seventy-four individuals with disabilities completed an online survey. SPSS was used to conduct four regression analyses—one for each of the four subscales of the Multidimensional Acceptance of Loss Scale (MALS). The 24 character strengths, which were measured by the Values in Action Inventory—72 (VIA-72), were entered in one block as predictors of each of the value changes associated with disability acceptance. Collectively, the 24 character strengths significantly predicted each of the 4 value changes in Wright’s theory, as measured by the MALS. Many of the individual character strengths were significantly associated with the value changes. Therefore, character strengths appear to enhance disability acceptance in people living with disabilities. The results provide support for the development of character strengths interventions for people with disabilities.
ChaiQ.YuanZ.JinY.ZhangQ. (2016). Factors influencing acceptance of disability among stroke patients in Tianjin, China: A cross-sectional study. NeuroRehabilitation, 38(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-151293
2.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3.
DavisD. E.ChoeE.MeyersJ.WadeN.VarjasK.GiffordA.WorthingtonE. L. (2016). Thankful for the little things: A meta-analysis of gratitude interventions. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 63(1), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000107
4.
DiezG.RocaP.NietoI.McGrathR. E.VázquezC. (2022). The network structure of the VIA-120 inventory of strengths: An analysis of 1,255,248 respondents. Journal of Positive Psychology, 18, 827–840. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2022.2109205
5.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191.
6.
FerrinJ. M.ChanF.ChronisterJ.ChiuC. Y. (2011). Psychometric validation of the Multidimensional Acceptance of Loss Scale. Clinical Rehabilitation, 25(2), 166–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215510380836
GroomesD. A.KampfeC. M.MapurangaR. (2011). The relationship between race and acceptance of disability when considering services through vocational rehabilitation. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 34(1), 57–65. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-2010-0534
9.
HanksR. A.RapportL. J.Waldron-PerrineB.MillisS. R. (2014). Role of character strengths in outcome after mild complicated to severe traumatic brain injury: A positive psychology study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 95(11), 2096–2102.
10.
HuangY.SmedemaS. (2023). Conducting rehabilitation research through Amazon Mechanical Turk: A user-friendly guide. Rehabilitation Research, Policy & Education, 37(4), 250–265. https://doi.org/10.1891/RE-22-20
LinleyP. A.HarringtonS. (2006). Strengths coaching: A potential-guided approach to coaching psychology. International Coaching Psychology Review, 1, 37–46.
13.
LivnehH.AntonakR. F. (2005). Psychosocial adaptation to chronic illness and disability: A primer for counselors. Journal of Counseling & Development, 83(1), 12–20.
14.
MartisC.LevanteA.De CarloE.IngusciE.SignoreF.LeccisoF. (2024). The power of acceptance of their disability for improving flourishing: Preliminary insights from persons with physical acquired disabilities. Disabilities, 4(4), 815–829. https://doi.org/10.3390/disabilities4040050
15.
NiemiecR. M. (2020). Six functions of character strengths for thriving at times of adversity and opportunity: A theoretical perspective. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 15, 551–572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-018-9692-2
16.
NiemiecR. M. (2023). Mental health and character strengths: The dual role of boosting well-being and reducing suffering. Mental Health and Social Inclusion, 27(4), 294–316. https://doi.org/10.1108/MHSI-01-2023-0012
17.
OgawaM.FujikawaM.JinK.KakisakaY.UenoT.NakasatoN. (2021). Acceptance of disability predicts quality of life in patients with epilepsy. Epilepsy & Behavior, 120, 107979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.107979
18.
ParkE. Y.KimJ. H. (2021). Interaction of socio-demographic characteristics on acceptance of disability among individuals with physical disabilities. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, Article 597817. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.597817
19.
ParkN. S.PetersonC.SeligmanM. E. P. (2004). Strengths of character and well-being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23, 603–619. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.23.5.603.50748
20.
ParkN. S.PetersonC.SeligmanM. E. P. (2006). Character strengths in fifty-four nations and the fifty US states. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1(3), 118–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760600619567
21.
PetersonC.ParkN. S.SeligmanM. E. P. (2006). Greater strengths of character and recovery from illness. Journal of Positive Psychology, 1(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760500372739
22.
PetersonC.SeligmanM. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A classification and handbook. American Psychological Association.
23.
ShogrenK. A.ShawL. A.RaleyS. K.WehmeyerM. L.NiemiecR. M.AdkinsM. (2018). Assessing Character Strengths in Youth With Intellectual Disability: Reliability and Factorial Validity of the VIA-Youth. Intellectual and developmental disabilities, 56(1), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-56.1.13
24.
SmedemaS. M.BhattaraiM. (2021). The unique contribution of character strengths to quality of life in persons with multiple sclerosis. Rehabilitation Psychology, 66(1), 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000363
25.
SmedemaS. M.CatalanoD.EbenerD. (2010). The relationship of coping responses to self-worth and subjective well-being: A structural equation model. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 53, 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0034355209358272
26.
SmedemaS. M.HuangY.FryH.Kriofske MainellaA. M. (2022). Coping and adaptation. In DunnD.WehmeyerM. (Eds.), The positive psychology of personal factors: Implications for understanding disability (pp. 41–64). Lexington Books.
27.
SnyderC. R.HarrisC.AndersonJ. R.HolleranS. A.IrvingL. M.SigmonS. T.YoshinobuL.GibbJ.LangelleC.HarneyP. (1991). The will and the ways: Development and validation of an individual-differences measure of hope. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(4), 570–585. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.4.570
28.
TabachinkB. G.FidellL. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
29.
UmucuE.LeeB.GenovaH. M.ChopikW. J.SungC.YasuokaM.NiemiecR. M. (2022). Character strengths across disabilities: An international exploratory study and implications for positive psychiatry and psychology. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, Article 863977. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.863977
30.
WilskiM.GabryelskiJ.BrolaW.TomaszT. (2019). Health-related quality of life in multiple sclerosis: Links to acceptance, coping strategies and disease severity. Disability and Health Journal, 12(4), 608–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2019.06.003
31.
WrightB. A. (1983). Physical disability: A psychosocial approach (2nd ed.). HarperCollins Publishers.
32.
YeheneE.LichtensternG.HarelY.DruckmanE.SacherY. (2020). Self-efficacy and acceptance of disability following mild traumatic brain injury: A pilot study. Applied neuropsychology. Adult, 27(5), 468–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2019.1569523
