Disability Self-Worth and Positive Personal Meaning in Disability: Correlates of Hope Among U.S. Residents With Physical Disabilities

Abstract

Research is beginning to indicate that positive disability identity is associated with positive psychosocial outcomes among people with disabilities. Personal disability identity (PDI) refers to self-concept as a person with a disability. Two studies were conducted to examine (a) the psychometric properties of new PDI subscales and (b) the association between the new subscales and hope, a cognitive motivational construct. In Study 1, the author examined the structural validity and internal consistency of recently developed measures of PDI (i.e., disability self-worth and personal meaning in disability) in a sample of 247 adults with physical and sensory disabilities. In Study 2, the author examined the association between the two PDI subscales and hope (i.e., pathways and agency) in a subsample of 147 U.S. residents. In Study 1, internal consistency of all instruments was supported and confirmatory factor analyses supported the structural validity of the PDI subscales in a sample representing a broader disability subgroup than the original measurement development study, which had exclusively examined adults with visual impairment and blindness (Zapata, 2019). In Study 2, findings from hierarchical linear regression indicated that scores on disability self-worth and personal meaning were significantly and positively associated with hope scores (p < .001), after accounting for demographic and disability characteristics. Study 1 found preliminary evidence to support the use of two new PDI subscales (i.e., disability self-worth and personal meaning) in academic research among adult U.S. residents with physical and sensory disabilities. Study 2 introduced disability self-worth and personal meaning as predictors of hope. Given prior research on the relationship between hope and positive adjustment among people with disabilities, these findings contribute to the emerging literature on the predictive role of disability identity in positive life outcomes among adults with disabilities.

Keywords

disability identity personal meaning self-worth hope physical disability

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andrews

E. E.

(2020). Disability as diversity: Developing cultural competence. Oxford University Press.

Baumeister

R. F.

(1999). Self-concept, self-esteem, and identity. In Derlega

V. J.

Winstead

B. A.

Jones

W. H.

(Eds.), Personality: Contemporary theory and research (Nelson-Hall series in psychology) (pp. 339–375). Nelson-Hall.

Bogart

K. R.

(2014). The role of disability self-concept in adaptation to congenital or acquired disability. Rehabilitation Psychology, 59, 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035800

Bogart

K. R.

(2015). Disability identity predicts lower anxiety and depression in multiple sclerosis. Rehabilitation Psychology, 60, 105–109. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000029

Bogart

K. R.

Lund

E. M.

Rottenstein

(2017). Disability pride protects self-esteem through the rejection-identification model. Rehabilitation Psychology, 63, 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000166

Buchanan

C. L.

Lopez

S. J.

(2013). Understanding hope in individuals with disabilities. In The Oxford handbook of positive psychology and disability (pp. 154–165). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195398786.013.034

Bulman

R. J.

Wortman

C. B.

(1977). Attributions of blame and coping in the “real world”: Severe accident victims react to their lot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 351–363. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.35.5.351

Cheavens

J. S.

Michael

S. T.

Snyder

C. R.

(2005). The correlates of hope: Psychological and physiological benefits. In Eliott

J. A.

(Ed.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on hope (pp. 119–132). Nova Science.

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.

10.

Comrey

A. L.

Lee

H. B.

(1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.

11.

Darling

R. B.

Heckert

D. A.

(2010). Orientations toward disability: Differences over the lifecourse. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 57, 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/10349121003750489

12.

Dorsett

(2010). The importance of hope in coping with severe acquired disability. Australian Social Work, 63, 83–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/03124070903464293

13.

Dunn

D. S.

(1994). Positive meaning and illusions following disability: Reality negotiation, normative interpretation, and value change. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 9, 123–138.

14.

Dunn

D. S.

(1996). Well-being following amputation: Salutary effects of positive meaning, optimism, and control. Rehabilitation Psychology, 41, 285–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/0090-5550.41.4.285

15.

Dunn

D. S.

(2005). Negotiating realities to understand others: Teaching about meaning and well-being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24(1), 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.24.1.30.59176

16.

Dunn

D. S.

(2015). The social psychology of disability. Oxford University Press.

17.

Dunn

D. S.

(Ed.). (2019). Understanding the experience of disability: Perspectives from social and rehabilitation psychology. Oxford University Press.

18.

Dunn

D. S.

Burcaw

(2013). Disability identity: Exploring narrative accounts of disability. Rehabilitation Psychology, 58, 148–157. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031691

19.

Dunn

D. S.

Uswatte

Elliott

T. R.

Lastres

Beard

(2013). A positive psychology of physical disability: Principles and progress. In Wehmeyer

M. L.

(Ed.), Oxford library of psychology: The Oxford handbook of positive psychology and disability (pp. 427–441). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195398786.013.013.0026

20.

Elliott

T. R.

Witty

T. E.

Herrick

S. M.

Hoffman

J. T.

(1991). Negotiating reality after physical loss: Hope, depression, and disability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 608–613. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.61.4.608

21.

Forber-Pratt

A. J.

Lyew

D. A.

Mueller

Samples

L. B.

(2017). Disability identity development: A systematic review of the literature. Rehabilitation Psychology, 62, 198–207. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000134

22.

Forber-Pratt

A. J.

Mueller

C. O.

Andrews

E. E.

(2019). Disability identity and allyship in rehabilitation psychology: Sit, stand, sign, and show up. Rehabilitation Psychology, 64, 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000256

23.

Forber-Pratt

A. J.

Zape

M. P.

(2017). Disability identity development model: Voices from the ADA-generation. Disability and Health Journal, 10, 350–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2016.12.013

24.

Gibson

(2006). Disability and clinical competency: An introduction. California Psychologist, 39, 6–10.

25.

Gill

C. J.

(1997). Four types of integration in disability identity development. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 9, 39–46. https://doi.org/10.3233/jvr-1997-9106

26.

Hahn

H. D.

Belt

T. L.

(2004). Disability identity and attitudes toward cure in a sample of disabled activists. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 45, 453–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/002214650404500407

27.

Hammack

P. L.

(2015). Theoretical foundations of identity. In McLean

K. C.

Syed

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of identity development. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199936564.013.027

28.

Heinemann

A. W.

Bulka

Smetak

(1988). Attributions and disability acceptance following traumatic injury: A replication and extension. Rehabilitation Psychology, 33, 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1037//0090-5550.33.4.195

29.

Irving

L. M.

Snyder

C. R.

Crowson

J. J.

(1998). Hope and coping with cancer by college women. Journal of Personality, 66, 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00009

30.

Kline

R. B.

(2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.

31.

Myers

N. D.

Ahn

Jin

(2011). Sample size and power estimates for a confirmatory factor analytic model in exercise and sport: A Monte Carlo approach. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 82, 412–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2011.10599773

32.

Olkin

(2002). Could you hold the door for me? Including disability in diversity. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 8, 130–137. https://doi.org/10.1037/1099-9809.8.2.130

33.

Olkin

(2017). Disability-affirmative therapy: A case formulation template for clients with disabilities. Oxford University Press.

34.

Olkin

Pledger

(2003). Can disability studies and psychology join hands? American Psychologist, 58, 296–304. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.4.296

35.

Oyserman

Elmore

Smith

(2012). Self, self-concept, and identity. In Leary

Tangney

(Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (2nd ed., pp. 69–104). Guilford Press

36.

Putnam

(2005). Conceptualizing disability: Developing a framework for political disability identity. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 16, 188–198. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.499

37.

Smedema

S. M.

Chan

J. Y.

Phillips

B. N.

(2014). Core self-evaluations and Snyder’s hope theory in persons with spinal cord injuries. Rehabilitation Psychology, 59, 399–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000015

38.

Snyder

C. R.

(1989). Reality negotiation: From excuses to hope and beyond. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 8(2), 130–157. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1989.8.2.130

39.

Snyder

C. R.

(1995). Conceptualizing, measuring, and nurturing hope. Journal of Counseling & Development, 73, 355–360. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1995.tb01764.x

40.

Snyder

C. R.

(2002). Hope theory: Rainbows in the mind. Psychological Inquiry, 13, 249–275. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1304_01

41.

Snyder

C. R.

Harris

Anderson

J. R.

Holleran

S. A.

Irving

L. M.

Sigmon

S. T.

Yoshinobu

Gibb

Langelle

Harney

(1991). The will and the ways: Development and validation of an individual-differences measure of hope. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 570–585. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.60.4.570

42.

Taylor

S. E.

(1983). Adjustment to threatening events: A theory of cognitive adaptation. American Psychologist, 38, 1161–1173. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.38.11.1161

43.

Wright

B. A.

(1983). Physical disability: A psychological approach (2nd ed.). HarperCollins. https://doi.org/10.1037/10589-000

44.

Zapata

M. A.

(2018). Personal disability identity in retinitis pigmentosa. Rehabilitation Psychology, 63, 512–520. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000238

45.

Zapata

M. A.

(2019). Personal disability identity measurement: Self-worth and personal meaning (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). ProQuest ID: Zapata_berkeley_0028E_19275. Merritt ID: ark:/13030/m5t20b0n. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1s79b3gt

46.

Zapata

M. A.

(2020). Disability affirmation and acceptance predict hope among adults with physical disabilities. Rehabilitation Psychology, 65(3), 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000364