Advocacy to Invigorate Rehabilitation Counseling Professional Associations: A Reflective Inquiry and Suggested Action Goals

Abstract

Reflections and recommendations from American Rehabilitation Counseling Association (ARCA) leaders were solicited and analyzed to explore challenging issues considered relevant to all rehabilitation counseling (RC) associations. Of the 29 locatable Past-Presidents (from 1980 through 2016), 12 persons (41%) participated. The free-response questions emailed were the following: (1) describe the best accomplishment of your year as President; (2) explain the biggest challenge at that time for ARCA as an organization; (3) explain the concurrent challenges for the RC profession; and (4) specify two top priorities that ARCA leaders should work on, to have positive impact on RC’s stakeholders. The verbatim responses, presented in full in this article, were categorized into thematic clusters. The major themes that were identified echoed findings from some related prior studies and ongoing discourse within RC. Recommended goals for the profession’s sustainability are to (a) shape a stronger professional identity that is better understood and appreciated; (b) support an organizational vehicle or association for publicizing our voice and vision, and cultivating growth through ongoing professional collaboration; (c) increase the meaningful impact our profession has on its stakeholder groups; (d) enhance and maintain high standards of rehabilitation education and competent, ethical practice; and (e) engage in partnership with the disability community.

Keywords

leadership professionalism/professional issues qualitative research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brubaker

D. R.

(1981). Identity and organizational problems in professional rehabilitation. Journal of Rehabilitation, 47, 54–58.

DiMichael

S. G.

Thomas

K. R.

(1985). ARCA’s journey in professionalism: A commemorative review on the 25th anniversary. Journal of Counseling & Development, 63, 428–435.

Emener

W. G.

Cottone

R. R.

(1989). Professionalization, deprofessionalization, and reprofessionalization of rehabilitation counseling according to criteria of professions. Journal of Counseling & Development, 67, 576–581.

Fals-Borda

Rahman

M. A.

(1991). Action and knowledge: Breaking the monopoly with participatory action research. New York, NY: Apex Press.

Hampton

N. Z.

Guillermo

M. S.

Tucker

Nichols

(2017). Broadening rehabilitation education and research through cultural humility: A conceptual framework for rehabilitation counseling. Rehabilitation Research, Policy, and Education, 31, 70–88.

Huber

M. J.

Walker

Q. D.

Dunlap

P. N.

Russell

V. E.

Richardson

T. V.

(2019). A revisited inquiry: A survey of the members of the American Rehabilitation Counseling Association. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 62, 121–127.

Irons

T. R.

(1989). Professional fragmentation in rehabilitation counseling. Journal of Rehabilitation, 55, 41–45.

Kemmis

McTaggart

(2005). Participatory action research: Communicative action and the public sphere. In Denzin

N. K.

Lincoln

Y. S.

(Eds.). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 559–603). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Koch

Schultz

Hennessey

Conyers

(2005). Rehabilitation research in the 21st centruy: Concerns and recommendations from members of the National Council on Rehabilitation Education. Rehabilitation Education, 19, 5–14.

10.

Matkin

(1984). Uniting rehabilitation activities: Results of the ARCA-NARPPS committee national surveys. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 28, 78–86.

11.

McCarthy

(2014). Cultivating our roots and extending our branches: Appreciating and marketing rehabilitation theory and research. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 57, 67–79.

12.

Myers

J. E.

(1995). Specialties in counseling: Rich heritage or force for fragmentation? Journal of Counseling & Development, 74, 115–116.

13.

Patterson

J. B.

(2008). Professional identity and the future of rehabilitation counseling. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 39, 60–64.

14.

Peterson

D. B.

Hautamaki

J. B.

Hershenson

D. B.

(2006). Reflections on our past and prospects for our future: A survey of the members of the American Rehabilitation Counseling Association (ARCA). Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 50, 4–13.

15.

Phillips

B. N.

Leahy

M. J.

(2012). Prediction of membership in rehabilitation counseling professional associations. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 55, 207–218.

16.

Shaw

L. K.

Leahy

M. J.

Chan

Catalano

(2006). Contemporary issues facing rehabilitation counseling: A Delphi study of the perspectives of leaders of the discipline. Rehabilitation Education, 20, 163–178.

17.

Skarlicki

D. P.

Lucas

Prociuk

Latham

G. P.

(2000). Factors explaining why people join, remain in, or leave a scholarly society: The Canadian Psychological Association. Canadian Psychology, 41, 69–74.