Accommodation Request Strategies Among Employees With Disabilities: Impacts and Associated Factors

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the prevalence of different workplace accommodation request strategies, the effectiveness of different request approaches, and situational and individual factors associated with different request strategies for individuals with disabilities. Common action plans of accommodation requests may vary depending on decisions about mentioning the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) (or not) and whether a formal (or informal) request is submitted, though past literature has focused primarily on formal accommodation requests made under the auspices of the ADA. Participants (n = 408) were recruited from rehabilitation agencies and organizations serving people with disabilities in the United States. The results indicated that informal requests without mentioning the ADA were found most often, followed by formal requests while not mentioning the ADA, formal requests while mentioning the ADA, and informal requests while mentioning the ADA. The odds of acquiring the requested accommodation were significantly higher, relative to other strategies, for requests made informally without mentioning the ADA. A variety of individual attributes capable of discerning when participants chose one strategy over another were observed; these included self-efficacy and outcome expectancy, negative affect, and an array of situational and personal attributes. Implications for research and practice were discussed.

Keywords

accommodations request strategies employees with disabilities

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-336, § 2, 104 Stat. 328. (1991).

Armstrong

R. A.

(2014). When to use the Bonferroni correction? Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 34, 502–508. doi:10.1111/opo.12131

Baldridge

Swift

(2011). Withholding requests for disability accommodation: The role of individual differences and disability attributes. Journal of Management, 39, 743–762. doi:10.1177/0149206310396375

Baldridge

Veiga

(2001). Toward a greater understanding of the willingness to request an accommodation: Can requesters’ beliefs disable the Americans with Disabilities Act? Academy of Management Review, 26, 85–99.

Baldridge

Veiga

(2006). The impact of anticipated social consequences on recurring disability accommodation requests. Journal of Management, 32, 158–179. doi:10.1177/0149206305277800

Chirikos

T. N.

(1999). Will the costs of accommodating workers with disabilities remain low? Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 17, 93–106.

Dong

(2017). Assessing workplace accommodation requests among older workers. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 61, 101–111. doi:10.1177/0034355216687286

Dong

Fabian

(2016). Requesting workplace accommodations: Impact of self-efficacy, outcome expectancy, and positive affect. Rehabilitation Psychology, 61, 371–379.

Dong

Guerette

Warner

Zalles

M. Z.

Mamboleo

(2017). Barriers in accommodation process among individuals with visual impairments. The Journal of Rehabilitation, 83(2), 27–35.

10.

Fesko

S. L.

(2001). Workplace experiences of individuals who are HIV+ and individuals with cancer. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 45, 2–11. doi:10.1177/003435520104500101

11.

Florey

A. T.

Harrison

D. A.

(2000). Responses to informal accommodation requests from employees with disabilities: Multistudy evidence on willingness to comply. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 224–233.

12.

Frank

J. J.

Bellini

(2005). Barriers to the accommodation request process of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The Journal of Rehabilitation, 71, 28–39.

13.

Friedman

(1993). Accommodation issues in the work place for people with disabilities: A needs assessment in an educational setting. Disability, Handicap & Society, 8, 3–23.

14.

Gates

L. B.

(2000). Workplace accommodation as a social process. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 10, 85–98.

15.

Hutton

C. C.

(2006). The role of work self-efficacy in sustaining employment among individuals with arthritis. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B. The Sciences and Engineering, 67(2–B), 1150.

16.

Johnson

W. G.

Baldwin

M. L.

Butler

R. J.

(1998). Back pain and work disability: The need for a new paradigm. Industrial Relations, 37, 9–34.

17.

MacDonald-Wilson

Fabian

Dong

(2008). Best practices in developing reasonable accommodations in the workplace: Findings based on the research literature. The Rehabilitation Professional, 16, 221–232.

18.

Roessler

Rumrill

(2018). The win-win approach to reasonable accommodations. Retrieved from https://www.nationalmssociety.org/NationalMSSociety/media/MSNationalFiles/Brochures/Brochure-Win-Win-Approach-to-Reasonable-Accomodations-Enhancing-Productivity-on-Your-Job.pdf

19.

Schur

Niishi

Adya

Kruse

Bruyere

Blanck

(2014). Accommodating employees with and without disabilities. Human Resource Management, 53, 593–621. doi:10.1002/hrm.21607

20.

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2000). Policy guidance on executive order 13164: Establishing procedures to facilitate the provision of reasonable accommodation. Retrieved from https://www.eeoc.gov//policy/docs/accommodation_procedures.html

21.

West

S. G.

Finch

J. F.

Curran

P. J.

(1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In Hoyle

(Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications (pp. 56–75). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.

22.

Williams

Sabata

Zolna

(2006). User needs evaluation of workplace accommodations. Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation, 27, 355–362.

23.

Wrzesniewski

Dutton

(2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26, 179–201.