The main objective of this study was to evaluate the measurement structure of the Multiple Sclerosis Environmental Supports Scale (MSESS) with 248 individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS). Exploratory factor analysis yielded three reliable factors (health and mental health services; rehabilitation, social, and support services; and independent living supports). The MSESS appears to be a promising rehabilitation assessment tool for individuals with MS, one that can be used by rehabilitation counselors to evaluate environmental support factors in their interview, assessment, and rehabilitation planning protocols.
CardolM.de HaanR. J.de JongB. A.van den BosG. A.de GrootI. J. (2001). Psychometric properties of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 82, 210–216.
2.
ChanF.PfallerJ. (2016). Development of the Multiple Sclerosis Environmental Supports Scale. Madison, WI: Rehabilitation Research and Training Center for Evidence-Based Practice in Vocational Rehabilitation.
3.
ChanF.SassonJ.DitchmanN.KimJ. H.ChiuC. Y. (2009). The World Health Organization ICF model as a conceptual framework of disability. In ChanF.CardosoE.ChronisterJ. (Eds.), Psychosocial interventions for people with chronic illness and disability: A handbook for evidence-based rehabilitation health professionals (pp. 23–74). New York, NY: Springer.
4.
ChanF.TarvydasV.BlalockK.StrauserD.AtkinsB. J. (2009). Unifying and elevating rehabilitation counseling through model-driven, diversity-sensitive evidence-based practice. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 52, 114–119.
5.
ChiuC. Y.ChanF.BishopM.da Silva CardosoE.O’NeillJ. (2013). State vocational rehabilitation services and employment in multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis Journal, 19, 1655–1664.
6.
CoenenM.CiezaA.FreemanJ.KhanF.MillerD.WeiseA.KesselringJ. (2011). The development of ICF Core Sets for multiple sclerosis: Results of the International Consensus Conference. Journal of Neurology, 258, 1477–1488.
7.
CrockerL.AlginaJ. (2006). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
8.
FloydF. J.WidamanK. F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7, 286–299.
9.
HamedR.TariahH. A.HawamdehZ. M. (2012). Personal factors affecting the daily functioning and well-being of patients with multiple sclerosis using the international classification of functioning model: A qualitative study. International Journal of Mental Health, 41(4), 47–61. doi:10.2753/IMH0020-7411410404
10.
HeinemannA. W.LaiJ. S.WongA.DashnerJ.MagasiS.HahnE. A.. . . MiskovicA. (2014). Using the ICF’s environmental factors framework to develop an item bank measuring built and natural environmental features affecting persons with disabilities. Quality of Life Research, 25, 2775–2786.
11.
JohnsonK. L.BamerA. M.YorkstonK. M.AmtmannD. (2009). Use of cognitive aids and other assistive technology by individuals with multiple sclerosis. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 4, 1–8.
12.
JonesS. M.AmtmannD. (2014). Health care worry is associated with worse outcomes in multiple sclerosis. Rehabilitation Psychology, 59, 354–359. doi:10.1037/a0037074
13.
KhanF.PallantJ. F. (2007). Use of International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) to describe patient-reported disability in multiple sclerosis and identification of relevant environmental factors. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 39, 63–70.
14.
KlineP. (1986). A handbook of test construction: Introduction to psychometric design. London, England: Methuen.
15.
KratzA. L.EhdeD. M.HanleyM. A.JensenM. P.OsborneT. L.KraftG. H. (2016). Cross-sectional examination of the associations between symptoms, community integration, and mental health in multiple sclerosis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 97, 386–394.
16.
KwiatkowskiA.MarissalJ. P.PouyfauconM.VermerschP.HautecoeurP.DervauxB. (2014). Social participation in patients with multiple sclerosis: Correlations between disability and economic burden. BMC Neurology, 14(1), Article 115.
NgL.AmatyaB.KhanF. (2013). Outcomes of a peer support program in multiple sclerosis in an Australian Community Cohort: A prospective study. Journal of Neurodegenerative Diseases, 2013, 1–7.
19.
NoreauL.BoschenK. (2010). Intersection of participation and environmental factors: A complex interactive process. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91(9), S44–S53.
20.
NunnallyJ. C.BernsteinI. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
21.
PlowM. A.FinlaysonM.GunzlerD.HeinemannA. W. (2015). Correlates of participation in meaningful activities among people with multiple sclerosis. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 47, 538–545.
22.
RumrillP. (2015). Issues in career development and vocational rehabilitation for people with multiple sclerosis. Rehabilitation Research, Policy, and Education, 29, 106–108.
23.
WhiteneckG. G.Harrison-FelixC. L.MellickD. C.BrooksC. A.CharlifueS. B.GerhartK. A. (2004). Quantifying environmental factors: A measure of physical, attitudinal, service, productivity, and policy barriers. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85, 1324–1335.
24.
YamoutB.IssaZ.HerlopianA.El BejjaniM.KhalifaA.GhadiehA. S.HabibR. H. (2013). Predictors of quality of life among multiple sclerosis patients: A comprehensive analysis. European Journal of Neurology, 20, 756–764.
