Sexual minority persons (i.e., lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer [LGBQ]) are at risk for developing chronic illness(es) and/or disabilities (CID); however, there is a dearth of information regarding the practices used by rehabilitation counselors working with this population. This modified grounded theory study aimed to understand the effective practices that rehabilitation counselors reported exhibiting when working with sexual minority persons living with CID. A total of 12 certified rehabilitation counselors were individually interviewed. Interviews were transcribed and recursively analyzed with a research team. Trustworthiness and credibility were ensured via in-depth member checking, researcher triangulation, and collection of rich descriptions from participants. A substantive model of rehabilitation counseling was constructed from the interviews, with Affirmative Intersectionality as the core category. Four supporting categories were also constructed, including professional attributes, alliance, intersectional sensitivity, and intersectional interventions. Details regarding the model are provided, as well as discussion on educational and supervision implications, study’s limitations, and future research implications.
AtkinsonD. R.BuiU.MoriS. (2001). Multiculturally sensitive empirically supported treatments: An oxymoron? In PonterottoJ. G.CasasJ. M.SuzukiL. A.AlexanderC. M. (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural counseling (2nd ed., pp. 542–574). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
5.
BabbittL. G. (2013). An intersectional approach to Black/White interracial interactions: The roles of gender and sexual orientation. Sex Roles, 68, 791–802. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0104-4
6.
BalkinR. S.WattsR. E.AliS. R. (2014). A conversation about the intersection of faith, sexual orientation, and gender: Jewish, Christian, and Muslim perspectives. Journal of Counseling & Development, 92, 187–193. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6676.2014.00147.x
7.
BernertD. J.DingK.HobanM. T. (2012). Sexual and substance use behaviors of college students. American Journal of Health Behavior, 36, 459–471.
8.
BronfenbrennerU.MorrisP. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In DamonW.LernerR. M. (Series Eds.), LearnerR. M. (Vol.Ed.), Theoretical Models of Human Development. Vol. 1: Handbook of child psychology (6th ed., pp. 793–828). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
9.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2011). Rationale for regular reporting on health disparities and inequalities– United States. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 60 (Suppl.), 3–10.
10.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London, England: SAGE.
11.
ChenE. C.AndrosiglioR.NgV. (2010). Minority stress and health of lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals: A developmental-contextual perspective. In PonterottoJ. G.Manuel CasasJ.SuzukiL. A.AlexanderC. M. (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural counseling (3rd ed., pp. 531–544). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
12.
ChengM. M.UdryJ. R. (2002). Sexual behaviors of physically disabled adolescents in the United States. Journal of Adolescent Health, 31, 48–58. doi:10.1016/S1054-139X(01)00400-1
13.
CochranS. D. (2001). Emerging issues in research on lesbians’ and gay men’s mental health: Does sexual orientation really matter?American Psychologist, 56, 927–932.
14.
CochranS. D.MaysV. M. (2007). Physical health complaints among lesbians, gay men, and bisexual and homosexually experienced heterosexual individuals: Results from the California quality of life survey. American Journal of Public Health, 97, 2048–2055. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2006.087254
15.
ColeE. R. (2009). Intersectionality and research in psychology. American Psychologist, 64, 170–180. doi:10.1037/a0014564
ConronK. J.MimiagaM. J.LandersS. J. (2010). A population-based study of sexual orientation identity and gender differences in adult health. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 1953–1960.
18.
ConstantineM. G.HageS. M.KindaichiM. M.BryantR. M. (2007). Social justice and multicultural issues: Implications for the practice and training of counselors and counseling psychologists. Journal of Counseling & Development, 85, 24–29.
19.
ConyersL. M.SmalP.ChiuY.-C. (2014). Addressing the career-related needs of women with disabilities. In StrauserD. R. (Ed.), Career development, employment, and disability in rehabilitation: From theory to practice (pp. 431–448). New York: Springer Publishing Company.
20.
DukeT. S. (2011). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth with disabilities: A meta-synthesis. Journal of LGBT Youth, 8, 1–52. doi:10.1080/19361653.2011.519181
21.
FassingerR. E. (2005). Paradigms, praxis, problems, and promise: Grounded theory in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 156–166. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.15
22.
FassingerR. E. (2008). Workplace diversity and public policy. American Psychologist, 63, 252–268. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.63.4.252
23.
FineM.AschA. (1988). Beyond pedestals. In FineM.AschA. (Eds.), Women with disabilities: Essays in psychology, culture and politics (pp. 1–37). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
24.
FragkiadakiE.StraussS. M. (2012). Termination of psychotherapy: The journey of 10 psychoanalytic and psychodynamic therapists. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 85, 335–350. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8341.2011.02035.x
25.
Fredriksen-GoldsenK. I.KimH.-J.BarkanS. E. (2012). Disability among lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults: Disparities in prevalence and risk. American Journal of Public Health, 102, e16–e21.
26.
GilbrideD.StensrudR. (2003). Job placement and employer consulting: Services and strategies. In SzymanskiE.ParkerR. (Eds.), Work and disability (2nd ed., pp. 407–439). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
27.
Gordon-FinlaysonA. (2010). QM2: Grounded theory. In ForresterM. (Ed.), Doing qualitative research in psychology: A practical guide (pp. 154–176). London, England: SAGE.
28.
GreeneB. (2000). Beyond heterosexism and across the cultural divide: Developing an inclusive lesbian, gay and bisexual psychology: A look to the future. In GreeneB.CroomG. L. (Eds.), Education, research, and practice in lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered psychology: A resource manual (pp. 1–45). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
29.
GreeneB. (2007). Delivering ethical psychological services to lesbian, gay, and bisexual clients. In BieschkeK. J.PerezR. M.DeBordK. A. (Eds.), Handbook of counseling and psychotherapy with lesbian gay, bisexual, and transgender clients (pp. 181–200). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
30.
HarleyD. A.HallM.SavageT. A. (2000). Working with gay and lesbian consumers with disabilities: Helping practitioners understand another frontier of diversity. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 31, 4–11.
31.
HarleyD. A.NowakT. M.GassawayL. J.SavageT. A. (2002). Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender college students with disabilities: A look at multiple cultural minorities. Psychology in the Schools, 39, 525–538. doi: 10.1002/pits10052
32.
HoltonJ. A. (2007). The coding process and its challenges. In BryantA.CharmazK. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of grounded theory (pp. 265–289). London, England: SAGE.
33.
HoutenvilleA.SevakP.O’NeillJ.CardosoE. (2014). Disability prevalence and economic outcomes. In StrauserD. (Ed.), Career development and youth with disabilities (pp. 11–40). New York, NY: Springer.
34.
HuntB.MatthewsC.MilsomA.LammelJ. A. (2006). Lesbians with physical disabilities: A qualitative study of their experiences with counseling. Journal of Counseling & Development, 84, 63–173.
35.
IsraelT.GorchevaR.WaltherW. A.SulznerJ. A.CohenJ. (2008). Therapists’ helpful and unhelpful situations with LGBT clients: An exploratory study. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 39, 361–368.doi:10.1037/0735-7028.39.3.361
36.
JohnstonM.RobertsonC.GlidewellL.EntwistleV.EcclesM. P.GrimshawJ. M. (2010). What is an adequate sample size? Operationalizing data saturation for theory based interview studies. Psychology & Health, 25, 1229–1245.
37.
KazukauskasK. A.LamC. S. (2009). Importance of addressing sexuality in certified rehabilitation counselor practice. Rehabilitation Education, 23, 127–139. doi:10.1891/088970109805059137
38.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 163–189). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
39.
MatthewsC. R. (2007). Affirmative lesbian, gay, and bisexual counseling with all clients. In BieschkeK. J.PerezR. M.DeBordK. A. (Eds.), Handbook of counseling and psychotherapy with lesbian gay, bisexual, and transgender clients (pp. 201–220). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
40.
MeyerI. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 674–697. doi:10.1037/033-2909
41.
MillingtonM. (2012). Basic do’s and don’ts in counseling persons with disabilities. In MariniI.Glover-GrafN. M.MillingtonM. J. (Eds.), Psychosocial aspects of disability: Insider perspectives and strategies for counselors (pp. 465–480). New York, NY: Springer.
42.
MorrowS. L. (2007). Qualitative research in counseling psychology: Conceptual foundations. The Counseling Psychologist, 35, 209–235. doi:10.1177/0011000006286990
43.
MorrowS. L.SmithM. L. (2000). Qualitative research for counseling psychology. In BrownS. D.LentR. W. (Eds.), Handbook of counseling psychology (3rd ed., pp. 199–230). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
44.
MorseJ. M. (2007). Sampling in grounded theory. In BryantA.CharmazK. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of grounded theory (pp. 229–264). London, England: SAGE.
45.
NoonanB. M.GallorS. M.Hensler-McGinnisN. F.FassingerR. E.WangS.GoodmanJ. (2004). Challenge and success: A qualitative study of the career development of highly achieving women with physical and sensory disabilities. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 68–80. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.51.1.68
46.
OddliH. W.HalvorsenM. S. (2014). Experienced psychotherapists’ reports of their assessments, predictions, and decision making in the early phase of psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 51, 295–307. doi:10.1037/a0029843
ParentM. C.DeBlaereC.MoradiB. (2013). Approaches to research on intersectionality: Perspectives on gender, LGBT, and racial/ethnic identities. Sex Roles, 68, 639–645. doi:10.1007/s11199-013-0283-2
49.
PoteatV. P.AragonS. R.EspelageD. L.KoenigB. W. (2009). Psychosocial concerns of sexual minority youth: Complexity and caution in group differences. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77, 196–201. doi:10.1037/a0014158
50.
Purdie-VaughnsV.EibachR. P. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles, 59, 377–391. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9424-4
51.
ShentonA. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22, 63–75.
52.
SmartJ. F.SmartD. W. (2006). Models of disability: Implications for the counseling profession. Journal of Counseling & Development, 84, 29–40.
53.
SmithE. (2006). The strength-based counseling model. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 13–69.
54.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
55.
SueD. W.SueD. (2008). Counseling the culturally diverse: Theory and practice (4th ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley.
WampoldB. E. (2001). The great psychotherapy debate: Models, methods, and findings. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
58.
WarnerL. R.ShieldsS. A. (2013). The intersections of sexuality, gender, and race: Identity research at the crossroads. Sex Roles, 68, 803–810. doi:10.1007/s11199-013-0281-4
