In the first of two rounds of interviews, 12 Social Security Administration (SSA) beneficiaries, all of whom professed a desire to work, discussed their perspectives on barriers to employment. Two years later, 8 of the 12 engaged in a second round of interviews. Only 1 of the 8 participants had succeeded in becoming self-supporting. After a review of the literature concerning the effects of SSA procedures in discouraging beneficiaries from seeking full-time work, the authors tell the stories of these participants and then analyze the findings using a phenomenological framework. They conclude by positing suggestions for how to improve outcomes for SSA beneficiaries in the future.
GrowickB. S.BabsonL. J. (2005). Reforming the social security disability system: A clarion call for change. Journal of Rehabilitation Administration, 29(3), 211–218.
6.
HotchkissJ. L. (2004). Growing part-time employment among workers with disabilities: Marginalization or opportunity?Economic Review—Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, 89(3), 25–41.
7.
KennedyJ.OlneyM. F. (2001). Job discrimination in the post ADA era: Estimates from the 1994 and 1995 National Health Interview Survey. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 45(1), 24–30.
8.
KennedyJ.OlneyM. F. (2006). Factors associated with workforce participation among SSDI beneficiaries. Journal of Rehabilitation, 72(4), 24–30.
9.
KennedyJ.OlneyM. F.RicherT.NewsomM. (2003). A profile of SSDI applicants and beneficiaries, age 18-64: Estimates from the 1994 and 1995 National Health Interview Surveys on Disability. Champaign: University of Illinois, Disability Research Institute.
10.
KennedyJ.OlneyM. F.Schiro-GeistC. (2004). A national profile of SSDI applicants: Implications for early intervention. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 15(3), 178–185.
11.
KornfieldR.RuppK. (2000). The net effect of the Project Network r-t-w case management experiment on participant earnings, benefit receipt & other outcomes. Social Security Bulletin, 63(1), 12–33.
12.
MariniI.ReidC. R. (2001). A survey of rehabilitation professionals as alternative provider contractors with social security: Problems and solutions. The Journal of Rehabilitation, 67(2), 36–44.
13.
McAlpineD. D.WarnerL. (2002). Barriers to employment among persons with mental illness: A review of the literature. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.
14.
McCarthyE. P.NgoL. H.ChirikosT. N.RoetzheimR. G.LiD.DrewsR. E.IezzoniL. I. (2007). Cancer stage at diagnosis and survival among persons with social security disability insurance on Medicare. Health Services Research, 42(2), 616–628.
15.
O’DayB. (1999). Policy barriers for people with disabilities who want to work. American Rehabilitation, 25(1), 8–19.
16.
OlneyM. F. (2007). Caught in a social safety net: Perspectives of recipients of social security disability programs on employment. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 38(2), 5–13.
17.
RogersJ. B.CrystalR. M.BishopM. (2005). Predicting rehabilitation outcome for Supplemental Security Income and Social Security Disability Income recipients: Implications for consideration with the Ticket to Work program. Journal of Rehabilitation, 71(3), 5–10.
18.
RoseA. M.GustafsonS. B. (2005). Research-based employment enabling: A new perspective on disability determination. Journal of Rehabilitation Administration, 29(3), 177–190.
TaylorS. J.BogdanR. (1998). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
24.
U.S. General Accounting Office. (2001). Other programs may provide lessons for return to work efforts. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
25.
WittenburgD.LoprestP. (2005). A more work-focused disability program? Challenges and options. Journal of Rehabilitation Administration, 29(3), 191–209.
