Minority is a term that has become particularly visible within the rehabilitation literature due to the increasing focus on the application of minority models to the understanding of the disability experience. At the same time, it is also one of the most ill-defined and misunderstood terms. In this article, the authors explore the meaning of minority status by discussing its core elements from a representational theory perspective. By doing so, they show that minority status is different from racial, ethnic, and cultural membership, although it partially overlaps with each of these constructs in some contexts. The authors argue that although race, culture, and ethnic minority status can attenuate or exacerbate minority status in some settings, these demographics are neither necessary nor sufficient conditions for minority status. Finally, the authors illustrate how many people with disabilities meet the essential criteria for minority status as outlined by representational theory and draw implications for rehabilitation practice, education, and research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abberley, P. (1997). Disabled people and “normality.” In J. Swain, V. Finkelstein, S. French, & M. Oliver (Eds.), Disabling barriers— Enabling environments (pp. 107—115). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
Alba, R. (1996). Italian-Americans: A century of ethnic change . In S. Pedraza & R. Rumbaut (Eds.), Origins and destinies: Immigration, race, and ethnicity in America (pp. 87—113). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
3.
Albrecht, G.L. (1992). The disability business: Rehabilitation in America . Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4.
American Anthropological Association. (1998 ). American Anthropological Association statement on “race.” Retrieved July 28, 2002, from http://www.ameranthassn.org/racepp.htm
5.
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.
6.
Apfelbaum, E. (2000). The impact of culture in the face of genocide: Struggling between a silenced home culture and a foreign host culture. In C. Squire (Ed.), Culture in psychology (pp. 163—174). Philadelphia: Routledge.
7.
Armstrong, F., & Barton, L. (Eds.). (1999). Disability, human rights and education (pp. 7—23). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
8.
Atkinson, D.R., Morten, G., & Sue, D.W. (1993). Counseling American minorities (4th ed.). Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark.
9.
Auslander, G.K., & Gold, N. (1999). A comparison of newspaper reports in Canada and Israel. Social Science and Medicine, 48, 1395— 1405.
10.
Bailey, D. (1991). Guideline for authors. Journal of Early Intervention, 15, 118—119.
11.
Bellini, J. (2003). Counselors' multicultural competencies and vocational rehabilitation outcomes in the context of counselor—client racial similarity and difference. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 46, 164—173.
12.
Benet-Martinez, V., Leu, J., Lee, F., & Morris, M.W. (2002). Negotiating biculturalism: Cultural frame switching in biculturals with op-positional versus compatible identities. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 492—516.
13.
Betancourt, H., & Lopez, S.R. (1993). The study of culture, ethnicity, and race in American psychology. American Psychologist, 48, 629— 637.
14.
Blaska, J. (1993). The power of language: Speak and write using “person first language.” In M. Nagler (Ed.), Perspectives on disability (pp. 25—32). Palo Alto, CA: Health Markets Research.
15.
Brzuzy, S. (1997). Deconstructing disability: The impact of definition . The Journal of Poverty, 1(1), 81—91.
16.
Cann, R.L., Stoneking, M., & Wilson, A.C. (1987). Mitochondrial DNA and human evolution. Nature, 325, 31—36.
17.
Casas, J.M. (1995). Counseling and psychotherapy with racial/ethnic minority in theory and practice. In B. Bongar & L. E. Beutler (Eds.), Comprehensive textbook of psychotherapy: Theory and practice (pp. 311— 335). New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
Chima, F.O. (1998). Workplace and disabilities: Opinions on work, interpersonal, and intrapersonal factors. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 29, 31—37.
19.
Citrin, J., Wong, C., & Duff, B. (2001). The meaning of American national identity: Patterns of ethnic conflict and consensus. In R. D. Ashmore, L. Jussim, & D. Walder (Eds.), Social identity, intergroup conflict and conflict reduction. Rutgers series on self and social identity : Vol. 3 (pp. 71—100). London : Oxford University Press.
20.
Conyers, L.M. (2002). Disability culture: An emerging topic in multicultural counseling. In J. Trusty, D. S. Sandhu, & E. J. Looby (Eds.), Multicultural counseling and development (pp. 173—202). Huntington, NY: Nova Science.
21.
Conyers, L.M., Koch, L., & Szymanski, E.M. (1998). Lifespan perspectives on disability and work: A qualitative study. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 42(1), 51—75.
22.
Cose, E. (1993). The rage of a privileged class: Why are middle-class blacks angry? Why should America care?New York: HarperCollins.
23.
Eaton, W.W. (1980). The sociology of mental illness. New York: Praeger.
24.
Finkelstein, V. (1993). The commonality of disability. In J. Swain, V. Finkelstein , S. French, & M. Oliver (Eds.), Disabling barriers— Enabling environments (pp. 9—16). London: Sage.
25.
Foucault, M. (1986). The history of sexuality: Vol 3. The care of the self. New York: Vintage Books.
26.
Frosh, S., Phoenix, A., & Pattman, R. (2000). Cultural contestations in practice: White boys and racialization of masculinities. In C. Squire (Ed.), Culture in psychology (pp. 47—58). Philadelphia: Routledge.
27.
Funk, R. (1987). Disability rights: From case to class in the context of civil rights. In A. Gartner & T. Joe (Eds.), Images of the disabled/ disabling images (pp. 7—30). New York : Praeger.
28.
Gans, H. (1979). Symbolic ethnicity: The future of ethnic groups and cultures in America. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 12,1—20.
29.
Glauser, A.S. (1999). Legacies of racism. Journal of Counseling and Development, 77, 62—67.
30.
Gliedman, J., & Roth, W. (1980). The unexpected minority. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
31.
Groce, N.E. (1985). Everyone here spoke sign language: Hereditary deafness on Martha's Vineyard. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32.
Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action: Vol. 1. Reason and the rationalization of society. Boston: Beacon.
33.
Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action: Vol. 2. Life-world and systems: A critique of functionalist reason (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston: Beacon.
34.
Haley, A. (1977). Roots. New York: Dell.
35.
Hahn, H. (1985). Toward a politics of disability: Definitions, disciplines, and policies. The Social Science Journal, 22, 87—105.
36.
Hahn, H. (1999). The political implications of disability: Definitions and data. In R. Marinelli & A. E. Dell-Orto (Eds.), The psychological and psychosocial social impact of disability (pp. 3—11). New York: Springer.
37.
Ho, D.Y.F. (1995). Internalized culture, culturocentrism, and transcendence . The Counseling Psychologist, 23, 4—24.
38.
Ignatiev, N. (1995). How the Irish became white. New York: Routledge.
39.
Ingstad, B., & Whyte, S.R. (1995). Disability and culture. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
40.
Isaacs, B. (1999, September 26). Cultural awakening: Native Americans embracing heritage face defining issues. Lexington Herald Leader, p. J3.
41.
Jones, S. (1997). The archaeology of ethnicity: Constructing identities in the past and present. London: Routledge.
42.
Kilbury, R.E., Benshoff, J.J., & Rubin, S.E. (1992). The interaction of legislation, public attitudes, and access to opportunities for persons with disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation, 58, 6—9.
43.
Klieman, C. (1995, July 30). Job bias is rampant, blatant, EEOC chief says. The Chicago Tribune, p. 1, Section 8.
44.
Krieger, N. (2000). Counting accountability: Public health implications of new approaches to classifying race/ethnicity in the United States 2000 census—US and global perspectives. American Journal of Public Health, 90, 1697—1689.
45.
LaCom, C. (1997). “It is more than lame”: Female disability, sexuality, and the maternal in the nineteenth novel. In D. T. Mitchell & S. L. Snyder (Eds.), The body and physical difference: Discourses of disability (pp. 189—201). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
46.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
47.
Leakey, R.E. (1978). People of the lake: Mankind and its beginnings . New York: Anchor Press.
48.
Levine, P., & Nourse, S.W. (1998). What follow-up studies say about post-school life for young men and women with learning disabilities: A critical look at the literature. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 212—233.
49.
Lipsitz, G. (1995). The possessive investment in whiteness: Racialized social democracy and the “white” problem in American studies. American Quarterly, 47, 369—387.
50.
Louis Harris& Associates. (1994). N.O.D./Harris survey of Americans with disabilities. Washington, DC: National Organization on Disability.
51.
Middleton, R.A., Rollins, C.W., & Harley, D.A. (1999). The historical and political context of the civil rights of persons with disabilities: A multicultural perspective for counselors . Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 27, 105—120.
52.
Mpofu, E., Beck, R., & Weinrach, S. (in press). Multicultural rehabilitation counseling: Challenges and strategies. In K. R. Thomas, F. Chan, & N. L. Berven (Eds.), Counseling theories and techniques for rehabilitation professionals. New York: Springer.
53.
Mpofu, E., Thomas, K.R., & Thompson, D. (1998). Cultural appropriation and rehabilitation counseling: Implications for rehabilitation education. RehabilitationEducation, 12, 205—261.
54.
Murphy, R. (1990). The body silent. New York: Holt.
55.
Nash, M. (1989). The cauldron of ethnicity in the modern world . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
56.
National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research. (1991). Chartbook on workforce disability in the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
57.
Newman, J.F., & Dinwoodie, R.E. (1996). Impact of the Americans with Disabilities Act on private sector employers. Journal of Rehabilitation Administration, 20, 3—14.
58.
Ozawa, M.N., & Tseng, H. (2000). Differences in net worth between elderly black people and elderly white people. Social Work Research, 24, 96—108.
59.
Padden, C. (1989). The deaf community and the culture of deaf people . In S. Wilcox (Ed.), American deaf culture: An anthology (pp. 1—16). Burtonsville, MD: Linstock.
60.
Peters, S. (2000). Is there a disability culture? A synchronization of three possible world views. Disability and Society, 15, 583—601.
61.
Pfeiffer, D. (1999). Eugenics and disability discrimination. In R. Marinelli & A. E. Dell-Orto (Eds.), The psychological and psychosocial social impact of disability (pp. 12—31). New York: Springer.
62.
Preston, P. (1994). Mother father deaf: Living between sound and silence . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
63.
Reeve, D. (2000). Oppression within the counseling room. Disability and Society, 14, 669—682.
64.
Sandieson, R. (1998). A survey on terminology that refers to people with mental retardation/developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 33, 290—295.
65.
Smart, J. (2001). Disability, society, and the individual. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.
66.
Smart, J.F., & Smart, D.W. (1993). Acculturation, biculturalism and the rehabilitation of Mexican Americans. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling , 24(2), 46—51.
67.
Solomon, B. (1995). In the company of educated women. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
68.
Stuart, O. (1993). Double oppression: An appropriate starting point . In J. Swain, V. Finkelstein, S. French, & M. Oliver (Eds.), Disabling barriers—Enabling environments (pp. 93—100). London: Sage.
69.
Szymanski, E. M., & Parker, R. M. (Eds.). (1996). Work and disability: Issues and strategies in career development and job placement. Austin: PRO-ED.
70.
Teo, T., & Febbraro, A.R. (1997). Norm, faculty, and power in multiculturalism. American Psychologist, 52, 656—661.
71.
Triandis, H.C. (1994). Culture and social behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
72.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2002). Statistical abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: Author.
73.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2003). Disability status: 2000. Washington, DC: Author.
74.
Van Scoy, H., & Oakland, T. (1991). Minority group literature in psychology and education journals: 1957-1973. Journal of Black Studies, 22, 301—310.
75.
Waters, M. (1996). Optional ethnicities: For whites only? In S. Pedraza & R. Rumbaut (Eds.), Origins and destinies: Immigration, race, and ethnicity in America (pp. 145—167). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
76.
Wilgosh, L., & Sandulac, C. (1997). Media attention to and treatment of disabilities information. Developmental DisabilitiesBulletin, 25, 94—103.
77.
Wilson, C. (1996). Racism: From slavery to advanced capitalism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
78.
Wilson, K.B., Jackson, R.L., & Doughty, J.D. (1999). Vocational rehabilitation acceptance: A tale of two races in a large midwestern state. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 30(2), 25—31.
79.
Wirth, L. (1945). The problem of minority groups. In R. Linton (Ed.), The science of man (woman) in the world crisis (pp. 347—372). New York: Columbia University Press.
80.
World Health Organization. (1980). International classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps. Geneva: Author.
81.
Wright, B.A. (1991). Labeling: The need for person-environment individuation . In C. R. Snyder & G. Forsyth (Eds.), Handbook of social and clinical psychology: The health perspective (pp. 469—487). New York: Pergamon Press.
82.
Yelin, E.H. (1991). Disability and the displaced worker. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
83.
Zuckerman, M. (1990). Some dubious premises in research and theory on racial differences: Scientific, social, and ethical issues. American Psychologist, 45, 1297—1303.
