Two randomly assigned groups of African American undergraduate students in rehabilitation services were asked to review case materials of a client who was portrayed as African American to one group and as European American to the other. Participants rated the client in terms of their clinical impressions and estimates of future potential. In Rosenthal and Berven's (1999) similar study, European American students rated the European American client as having higher educational and employment potential than the African American client. In our study, African American students rated the African American client as having higher educational potential than the European American client. In addition, across all four of the other independent measures (general evaluation, psychopathology—conduct, psychopathology—substance abuse, and vocational potential), African American participants demonstrated no bias against the African American client or the European American client. The differential findings of these two studies and their implications for education and future research are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abbott, K., Tollefson, N., & McDermott, D. (1982). Counselor race as a factor in counselor preference . Journal of College Student Personnel, 23(1), 36—40.
2.
Alston, R.J., & Mngadi, S. (1992). The interaction between disability status and the African-American experience: Implications for rehabilitation counseling . Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 23(2), 12—16.
3.
Atkinson, D. (1983). Ethnic similarity in counseling psychology. Counseling Psychologist,11(3), 79—92.
4.
Berven, N.L. (1987). Improving evaluation in counselor training and credentialing through standardized simulations. In B. A. Edelstein & E. S. Berler (Eds.), Evaluation and accountability in clinical training (pp. 203—229). New York: Plenum .
5.
Berven, N.L. (1997). Professional practice: Assessment. In D. R. Maki & T. F. Riggar (Eds.), Rehabilitation counseling: Profession and practice (pp. 151—169). New York: Springer.
6.
Capella, M.E. (2002). Inequities in the VR system: Do they still exist?Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 45, 143—153.
7.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8.
Cross, W.E., Jr. (1971). The Negro to Black conversion experience. Black World, 20, 13—27.
9.
Dembo, R., Ikle, D.N., & Ciarlo, J.A. (1983). The influence of client-clinician demographic match on client treatment outcomes. Journal of Psychiatric Treatment andEvaluation, 5, 45—53.
10.
Devine, P.G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 56, 5—18.
11.
Dzieken, K.I., & Okocha, A.G. (1993). Accessibility of rehabilitation services; comparison by racial-ethnic status. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin ,36, 183—189.
12.
Faust, D., & Ziskin, J. (1988). The expert witness in psychology and psychiatry . Science, 241, 31—35.
13.
Feist-Price, S. (1995). African Americans with disabilities and equity in vocational rehabilitation services: One's state's review. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 39, 119—129.
14.
Garb, H.N. (1998). Studying the clinician: Judgment research and psychological assessment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
15.
Goldberg, L.R. (1959). The effectiveness of clinicians' judgment. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 23, 25—33.
16.
Granello, D.H., & Wheaton, J.E. (1998). Self-perceived multicultural competencies of African American and European American vocational rehabilitation counselors. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 42, 2—14.
Hiler, E.W., & Nesvig, D. (1965). An evaluation of criteria used by clinicians to infer pathology from figure drawings. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 29, 520—529.
Johnston, R., & McNeal, B.F. (1967). Statistical versus clinical prediction. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 72, 335—340.
21.
Lopez, S.R. (1989). Patient variable biases in clinical judgment: Conceptual overview and methodological considerations. Psychological Bulletin,106, 184—203.
22.
McGinn, F., Flowers, C.R., & Rubin, S.E. (1994). In quest of an explicit multicultural emphasis in ethical standards for rehabilitation counselors. Rehabilitation Education, 7, 261—268.
23.
Morrow, K.A., & Deidan, C.T. (1992). Bias in the counseling process: How to recognize and avoid it. Journal of Counseling & Development, 70, 571—577.
24.
Monteith, M.J., Zuwerink, J.R., & Devine, P.G. (1994). Prejudice and prejudice reduction: Classic challenges, contemporary approaches. In P. G. Devine , D. L. Hamilton, & T. M. Ostrom (Eds.), Social cognition: Impact on social psychology (pp. 323—346). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
25.
Okonji, J., Ososkie, J.N., & Pulos, S. (1996). Preferred style and ethnicity of counselors by African American males. Journal of AfricanAmerican Psychology , 22(3), 329—339.
26.
Osgood, C., Suci, G., & Tannebaum, P. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
27.
Proctor, E.K., & Rosen, A. (1981). Expectations and preferences for counselor race and their relation to intermediate treatment outcomes. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28, 40—46.
28.
Rabinowitz, J. (1993). Diagnostic reasoning and reliability: A review of the literature and a model of decision-making. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 14, 297—316.
29.
Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1992, 29 U.S.C. § 701 et seq.
30.
Rosenthal, D.A., & Berven, N.L. (1999). Effects of client race on clinical judgment. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 42, 243—265.
31.
Rosenthal, D.A., & Kosciulek, J.F. (1996). Clinical judgment and bias due to client race or ethnicity: An overview with implications for rehabilitation counselors. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 27(3), 30—36.
32.
Sodowsky, G.R., Taffe, R.C., Gutkins, T.B., & Wise, S.L. (1994). Development of the Multicultural Counseling Inventory: A self-report measure of multicultural competencies. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 41, 137—148.
33.
Spengler, P.M., Strohmer, D.C., & Prout, H.T. (1990). Testing the robustness of the diagnostic overshadowing bias. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 95, 204—214.
Strohmer, D.C., & Shivy, V.A. (1994). Bias in counselor hypothesis testing: Testing the robustness of counselor confirmatory bias. Journal of Counseling & Development, 73, 191—198.
36.
Strohmer, D.C., Shivy, V.A., & Chiodo, A.L. (1990). Information processing strategies in counselor hypothesis testing: The role of selective memory and expectancy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37, 465—472.
37.
Sue, D.W., Arrendondo, P., & McDavis, R.J. (1992). Multicultural counseling competencies and standards: A call to the profession. Journal of Counseling and Development , 70, 477—486.
38.
Terrell, F., & Terrell, S. (1984). Race of counselor, client sex, cultural mistrust level, and premature termination from counseling among African American clients . Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31, 371—375.
39.
Thomas, K.R., & Wienrach, S.G. (2002). Racial bias in rehabilitation: Multiple interpretations of the same data. RehabilitationEducation, 16(1), 81—90.
40.
Tomlinson-Clarke, S., & Camilli, G. (1995). An exploratory study of counselor judgments in multicultural research. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 23, 237—245.
41.
Wheaton, J.E. (1995). Vocational rehabilitation acceptance rates for European Americans and African Americans: Another look. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 38, 224—231.
42.
Wilson, K.B. (2000). Predicting vocational rehabilitation acceptance rates based on race, education, work status, and source of support at application . Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 43, 97—105.
43.
Wilson, K.B. (2002). Exploration of vocational rehabilitation acceptance and ethnicity: A national investigation. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 45, 168—176.
44.
Wilson, K.B., Alston, R.J., Harley, D.A., & Mitchell, N.A. (2002). Predicting vocational rehabilitation acceptance based on race, gender, education, work status at application, and primary source of support at application. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 45, 132—142.
