New models of job placement have emerged over the last few years that focus on creating demand among employers for people with disabilities. Partnerships between employers and vocational rehabilitation agencies represent one of these approaches. This study investigated the factors that underpin the establishment, development, and maintenance of such partnerships. Using a qualitative approach, semi-structured interviews were conducted with employers and vocational rehabilitation agencies currently involved in partnerships. The identified factors underpinning partnerships were similar to those obtained from previous research. However, it was also found that these characteristics may differ according to the stage of development of partnerships. Implications of these findings for rehabilitation counselor practice are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
The Australian Law Reform Commission. (1995 ). Making rights count: Services to people with a disability, ALRC79. Canberra, Australia: Author .
2.
Bissonette, D. (1994). Beyond traditional job development: The art of creating opportunity. Chatsworth, CA: Milt Wright and Associates.
3.
Boggs, G.C., & Growick, B.S. (1994). Industrial rehabilitation: Preparing professionals for a post-ADA world. RehabilitationEducation, 8(1), 59-66.
4.
Brabham, R., Mandeville, K.A., & Koch, L. (1998). The state-federal vocational rehabilitation program . In R. M. Parker & E. M. Szymanski (Eds.), Rehabilitation counseling: Basics and beyond (3rd ed., pp. 41-70). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
5.
Danek, M.M., Conyers, L.M., Enright, M.S., Munson, M., Brodwin, M., Hanley-Maxwell, C., & Gugerty, J. (1996). Legislation concerning career counseling and job placement for people with disabilities. In E. M. Symanski & R. M. Parker (Eds.), Work and disability: Issues and strategies in career development and job placement (pp. 39-78). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
6.
Deming, W.E. (1982). Quality, productivity and competitive position . Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
7.
Donovan, M.R., & Tilson, G.P. (1998). The Marriott Foundation's "Bridges ... From School to Work" program—a framework for successful employment outcomes for people with disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation , 10, 15-21.
8.
Fabian, E.S., Luecking, R.G., & Tilson, G.P. (1994). A working relationship: The job development specialist's guide to successful partnerships with business. Baltimore : Brookes.
9.
Ford, L.H., & Swett, E.A. (1999). Job placement and rehabilitation counselors in the state-federal system. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin , 42(4), 354-362.
10.
Fraser, R.T. (1999). Rehabilitation counselor placement-related attributes in the present economy: A project with industry perspective. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 42(4), 343-340.
11.
General Accounting Office. (1993). Vocational rehabilitation: Evidence for Federal program's effectiveness is mixed. Washington DC: Author.
12.
Gibbs, W. (1990). Alternative measures to evaluate the impact of vocational rehabilitation services. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 34(1), 33-43.
13.
Gilbride, D.D., & Stensrud, R. (1999). Demand-side job development and system change . Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 42(4), 329-339.
14.
Gilbride, D.D., Stensrud, R., & Johnson, M. (1994). Current models of job placement and employer development. RehabilitationEducation, 7(4), 215-240.
15.
Gliner, J.A. (1994). Reviewing qualitative research: Proposed criteria for fairness and rigor. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research , 4(2), 78-90.
16.
Greenwood, R., Johnson, V.A., & Schriner, K. (1988). Employer perspectives on employer-rehabilitation partnerships. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling , 19(1), 3-7.
17.
Hagner, D.C., & Helm, D.T. (1994). Qualitative methods in rehabilitation research . Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 37(4), 290-303.
18.
Handy, C.B. (1997). The hungry spirit: Beyond capitalism: A quest for purpose in the modern world. London: Hutchinson.
Kidder, L.H., & Judd, C.M. (1986). Research methods on social relations (5th ed.). Orlando, FL: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
21.
Krathwohl, D.R. (1993). Methods of educational and social science research: An integrated approach. White Plains, NY: Longman.
22.
Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic enquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
23.
Neuman, W.L. (1991). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
24.
Neuman, W.L. (1997). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (3rd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
25.
Patton, M.Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
26.
Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
27.
Robson, C. (1993). Real world research: A resource for social scientists and practical researchers. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
28.
Rubin, S.E., & Roessler, R.T. (1995). Foundations of the vocational rehabilitation process (4th ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
29.
Smith, R.S. (1986). The economics of job displacement. In M. Berkwitz & M. A. Hill (Eds.), Disability and the labor market (pp. 171-195). New York: ILR Press.
30.
Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Szymanski, E.M., Ryan, C., Merz, M.A., Trevino, B., & Johnston-Rodriguez, S. (1996). Psychosocial and economic aspects of work: Implications for people with disabilities. In E. M. Szymanski & R. M. Parker (Eds.), Work and disability: Issues and strategies in career development and job placement (pp. 9-31). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
32.
Weaver, C.L. (1995). Privatizing vocational rehabilitation: Options for increasing individual choice and enhancing competition. Journal of DisabilityPolicy Studies, 5(1), 53-76.
