The indirect method error-choice technique was adapted to develop the ADA Information Survey (ADA-IS), which assessed the attitude of 57 master's level rehabilitation counseling students, 62 college students with disabilities, and 83 small business employers, toward the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Title I. Students with disabilities held the most favorable attitudes; rehabilitation counseling students' attitudes were more favorable than employers' attitudes. The construct validity and reliability of the ADA-IS were examined. Discussion of and suggestions for using the ADA-IS for advocacy and educational purposes and for future research are presented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.
2.
Antonak, R.F. (1982). Development and psychometric analysis of the Scale of Attitudes Toward Disabled Persons. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 13(2), 22-29.
3.
Antonak, R.F., & Livneh, H. (1995a). Direct and indirect methods of measure attitudes toward persons with disabilities, with an exegesis of the error-choice test method. Rehabilitation Psychology, 40(1), 3-24.
4.
Antonak, R.F., & Livneh, H. (1995b). Development, psychometric analysis, and validation of an error-choice test to measure attitudes toward persons with epilepsy . Rehabilitation Psychology, 40(1), 25-38.
5.
Asch, A. (1984). The experience of disability: A challenge for psychology. American Psychologist, 39, 529-536.
6.
Bennett, S. (1990). Knocking down the barriers. The Progressive Grocer, 69(11),134.
7.
Berkowitz, E.D. (1987). Disabled policy: America's programs for the handicapped . New York: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Brown, D. (1990). Facing the future: Readying rehabilitation for the year 2000. The Journal of Rehabilitation, 56(2), 17-20.
9.
Campbell, D. (1950). The indirect assessment of social attitudes. Psychological Bulletin,47, 15-38.
10.
Cannon, B.J., & Szuhay, J.A. (1986). Faking can elevate scores on the Attitudes Toward Disabled Persons Scale. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin , 30, 120-124.
11.
Chubon, R.A. (1992). Attitudes toward disability: Addressing fundamentais of attitude theory and research in rehabilitation education. RehabilitationEducation, 6, 301-312.
12.
Cook, D. (1992). Psychosocial impact of disability. In R. M. Parker & E. M. Szymanski (Eds.), Rehabilitation counseling basics and beyond (2nd ed., pp. 249-272). Austin, TX : PRO-ED.
13.
Dawes, R.M. (1972). Fundamentals of attitude measurement. New York: Wiley.
14.
Downes, S.C., & Thomas, S.W. (1994). The Americans with Disabilities Act: Implications for education of vocational evaluation, job development and job placement personnel. RehabilitationEducation, 8(1), 27-35.
15.
English, R.W., & Oberle, J.B. (1971). Toward the development of new methodology for examining attitudes toward disabled persons. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 15, 88-96.
16.
Gade, R., & Johnson, V.A. (1985). Employers' attitudes toward hiring epileptics: Implications for job placement. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 26, 353-356.
17.
Gatty, B. (1991). Vagueness of disabilities act concerns industry . Hotel and Motel Management, 206(8) 17-18.
18.
Hagler, P., Vargo, J., & Semple, J. (1987). The potential for faking on the Attitudes Toward Disabled Persons Scale. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin , 31, 72-76.
19.
Hammond, K.R. (1948). Measuring attitudes by error-choice: An indirect method. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 43, 38-48.
20.
Harris, L. (1986). Disabled Americans' self-perception: Bringing disabled Americans into the mainstream (Study 864009). New York: Lou Harris and Associates.
21.
Home, M.D. (1980). How attitudes are measured: A review of an investigation of professional, peer, and parent attitudes toward the handicapped. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service .
22.
Huitt, K., & Elston, R.R. (1991). Attitudes toward persons with disabilities expressed by professional counselors. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 22(2), 42-43.
23.
Jay, L. (1990, January). The Americans with Disabilities Act: Feel good legislation?Management Review, 22-24.
24.
Lemon, N. (1973). Attitudes and their measurement. London: Batsford.
25.
Liachowitz, C.H. (1988). Disability as a social construct: Legislative roots. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
26.
Livneh, H., & Antonak, R. (1994). Indirect methods to measure attitudes toward persons with disabilities. RehabilitationEducation, 8, 103-137.
27.
Makas, E., Finnerty-Fried, P., Sigafoos, A., & Reiss, D. (1988). The Issues in Disability Scale: A new cognitive and affective measure of attitudes toward people with physical disabilities . Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 19 (1), 21-29.
Moore, T.J. (1993). Attitudes toward Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act held by rehabilitation service providers, private sector representatives, and people with disabilities in Illinois (Doctoral dissertation, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, 1993). Dissertation Abstracts International, 53, D6022.
30.
Moore, T.J., & Crimando, W. (1995). Attitudes toward Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 38, 232-247.
31.
Nederhof, A.J. (1985). Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 263-280.
32.
Pedhazur, E.J., & Schmelkin, L.P. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33.
Rorer, L.G. (1965). The great response-style myth. Psychological Bulletin,63, 129-156.
34.
Satcher, J., & Hendren, G.R. (1991). Acceptance of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 by persons preparing to enter the business field. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 22(2), 15-18.
35.
Satcher, J., & Hendren, G.R. (1992). Employer agreement with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990: Implications for rehabilitation counseling. The Journal of Rehabilitation, 58(3), 13-17.
36.
Scott, O., & Rohrbach, J. (1977). A comparison of five criteria for identifying fakeable items on an attitude inventory. Journal of Experimental Education, 45(3), 51-55.
37.
Siller, J. (1970). Generality of attitudes toward the physically disabled. Proceedings of the 8th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 5, 697-698.
38.
Speakman, H.G.B., & Hoffman, C.M. (1979). The "fakeability" of the Attitudes Toward Disabled Persons Scale: Form B. Physical Therapy, 62, 191-194.
39.
Speakman, H.G.B., & Kung, J.S. (1982). Attitudes of physical therapists in Wisconsin toward disabled persons. Physical Therapy, 62, 866-868.
40.
StatisticalPackage for Social Sciences (Version 7.1) [Computer software]. (1997). New York: Springer.
41.
Stude, E.W. (1994). Implications of the ADA for master's and bachelor's level rehabilitation counseling and rehabilitation services professionals. RehabilitationEducation, 8, 265-273.
42.
Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (1989). Using multivariate statistics (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
43.
U.S. General Accounting Office. (1994). Results of the state-federal vocational rehabilitation program. Washington, DC: Author.
44.
Vargo, J.S. & Semple, J.E. (1984). Honest versus fake scores on the Attitudes Toward Disabled Persons Scale-Form A. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin , 27, 182-185.
45.
Walls, R.G., & Fullmer, S.L. (1996). Comparing rehabilitated workers with the United States workforce. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin40, 153-164.
46.
Weschler, I.R. (1950). An investigation of attitudes toward labor and management by means of the error-choice method: I. The Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 51-62.
47.
West, J. (1995). ADA: Taking stock and looking to the future. Civil Rights Journal, 1, 42-47.
48.
Yuker, H.E. (1986). The Attitudes Toward Disabled Persons scale: Susceptibility to faking. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 28, 156-162.
49.
Yuker, H.E., Block, J.R., & Campbell, W.J. (1960). A scale to measure attitudes toward disabled persons (Human Resources Study No. 5). Albertson, NY: Human Resources Research Foundation .
