Commercial materials can offer many practical benefits to the EAP teacher. But how useful are EAP materials produced predominantly for western contexts to learners in Southeast Asia? This paper examines some limitations in commercial EAP materials. In particular, I will focus on socio-cultural bias present in these materials. I will do this in the context of three EAP environments, which I have distinguished. Each of these environments will be described and compared. I will end by proposing some possible solutions to help meet the needs of our EAP environments. Although examples will be drawn mainly from Southeast Asia, the discussion will be of interest to anyone involved in EAP in otherAsian countries.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, P., B. Heaton and P. Howarth.1991. Socio-Cultural Issues in English for Academic Purposes. London: Modern English Publications, The British Council.
2.
Altbach, P.G. and Kelly, G.P.1984. Education and the Colonial Experience, Second revised edition. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.
3.
Asmah Haji Omar.1996. English in Public Policy and Community Use: A Question of Status and Goals. Keynote address at the Conference on English in Southeast Asia, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 21-23 November 1996.
4.
Bray, M. and Lee, W.O.1996. Education and socio-political transitions in Asia: Diversity and commonality. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 16:1, 1-23.
5.
Chaudron, C. and Richards, J.1986. The effects of discourse markers on the comprehension of lectures. Applied Linguistics, 7:2: 113-127.
6.
Harvard University.1992. English as a second language CUPID pilot, Technology Window, 6:7, Office for Information Technology, Harvard University.
7.
Holly, D.1990. The unspoken curriculum, or how language teaching carries cultural and ideological messages'. In B. Harrison (ed.). Culture and the Language Classroom. London: Modern English Publications, The British Council .
8.
Lynch, T. and K. Anderson.1991. Do you mind if I come in here? A comparison of EAP seminar/ discussion materials and the characteristics of real academic interaction. In P. Adams, B.Heaton, and P. Howarth. (eds.). Socio-Cultural Issues in English forAcademic Purposes . London: Modern English Publications, The British Council.
9.
Lynch, T.1994. Training lecturers for international audiences . In J. Flowerdew (ed.) Academic Listening: Research Perspectives. Cambridge University Press.
10.
Price, K.1995. How technology changes the way we teach and learn . Language and Communication Review. Issue No.2, STETS, Singapore.
11.
Rajah, M.T.1990. Socio-political changes and their implications for second language learning: the case of Malaysia' In B. Harrison (ed.). Culture and the Language Classroom. Modern English Publications, The British Council .
12.
Richards, J.C.1993. Beyond the text book: The role of commercial materials in language teaching'. RELC Journal, 24:1: 1-14.
13.
Samuel, M.1996. The challenge of diversity: Culture and the recontextualization of pedagogy'. In G. M. Jacobs (ed,). Language Classrooms of Tomorrow: issues and Responses, RELC, Singapore.
14.
UNESCO. 1993. World Education Report. Paris: UNESCO.
15.
Valdes, J.1990. The inevitability of teaching and learning culture in a foreign language course. In B. Harrison (ed.). Culture and the Language Classroom. London: Modern English Publications, The British Council .
16.
Widdowson, H.G.1983. Learning Purpose and Learning Use. Oxford University Press.
17.
Williams, M.1988. Language taught for meetings and language used in meetings: Is there anything in common( Applied Linguistics , 6:1: 71-90.
18.
Wolvin, A. and C.G. Coakely.1994. Listening. (Fourth Edition). Dubuque: Wm. C. Brown Publishers.
19.
Wong, H.1997. ESL Programmes at Tertiary Level: Balancing Policy, Attitudes, and Learner Realities. Keynote address at RELC Seminar, Singapore, 21-23 April 1997 .
20.
Zulkiffli Yaacob and Sharifah ZainabSyed Mohd Khalid.1992. Attitudes and reactions towards the matriculation English language programme at the Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia: Experiences from past and present, and implications for future curriculum planning. In Toh K.A. (ed.).Curriculum Research and Practice: Cauldron or Crucible? Educational Research Association, Singapore.
