This article examines post-war developments in English language education in Hong Kong and, in particular, the 'communicative' English language syllabus, a major government-sponsored innovation in language education in the past 15 years. The article begins with a historical perspective on the issue of 'declining' English standards in Hong Kong, before going on to examine the aims and implementation of a learner-centred, process-oriented teaching approach in English language classrooms in Hong Kong. These contextual factors are analysed at the following levels: Hong Kong society (the politcal, economic, social and cultural context), the Hong Kong educational system, Hong Kong secodnary schools, and the English language classroom (which includes learning activities and materials, teacher and learner roles, and classroom interaction).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anon. (1959). Question and answer . The English Bulletin, 3, 2-4.
2.
Anon. (1960). Question and answer . The English Bulletin, 3, 28-32.
3.
Bickley, V. (1987). Developments in English language teacher education . In Lord, R. and Cheng, H. (Eds.) Language education in Hong Kong, 187-218. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
4.
Breen, M. and Candlin, C. (1980). The essentials of a communicative curriculum in language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 1, 89-112.
5.
Brock, M. (1994). Reflections on change: Implementing the process approach in Hong Kong. RELC Journal, 25, 51-70.
6.
Brown, H. (1994). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.
7.
Bruce, N. (1990). EL2 medium education in a largely monolingual society: The case of Hong Kong. Hong Kong Papers in Linguistics andLanguage Teaching, 13, 9-20.
8.
Burney, E. (1935). Report on education in Hong Kong. London: Crown Agents.
9.
Byrne, G. (1933). The problem of education in Hong Kong. Hong Kong UniversityEducation Journal, 8, 13-18.
10.
Canale, M. (1983). From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In Richards, J. and Schmidt, R. (Eds.) Language and communication, 2-27. Harlow: Longman.
11.
Chan, V. (1995). Communicative language teaching - Focus on the learner. Unpublished M.A. dissertation, Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
12.
Chaudron, C. (1988). Second language classrooms: Research on teaching and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Cheng, W. (1983). The changing patterns of English language teaching in Hong Kong: 1945 - 1983. Chinese University of Hong Kong Education Journal, 11, 86-95.
14.
Cheung, Y.S. (1984). The uses of English and Chinese languages in Hong Kong. Language Learning and Communication, 3, 273-283.
15.
Clark, C. and Yinger, R. (1979). Teachers' thinking. In Peterson, P. and Walberg, H. (Eds.) Research on teaching, 231-263. Berkeley: McCuthen.
16.
Clarke, D. (1989). Communicative theory and its influence on materials production. Language Teaching, 22, 73-86.
17.
Crookes, G. and Chaudron, C. (1991). Guidelines for classroom language teaching. In Celce-Murcia, M. (Ed.) Teaching English as a second or foreign language. New York: Newbury House.
18.
Curriculum Development Committee (CDC). (1975 ). Provisional Syllabus for English (Forms I-V). Hong Kong: Government Printer.
19.
Curriculum Development Committee (CDC). (1976 ). The Primary English Syllabus. Hong Kong : Government Printer.
20.
Curriculum Development Committee (CDC). (1981 ). English (Primary 1-6). Hong Kong: Government Printer.
21.
Curriculum Development Committee (CDC). (1983). Syllabus for English (Forms I-V). Hong Kong: Government Printer.
22.
Education Commission. ( 1994). Report of the working group on language proficiency. Hong Kong: Government Printer.
23.
Education Commission. ( 1995). Enhancing language proficiency: A comprehensive strategy. Hong Kong: Government Printer.
24.
Etherton, A. (1981). English language syllabuses in Hong Kong. The EnglishBulletin, 7, 9-18.
25.
Evans, S. (1995). An investigation into the development of the Syllabus for English (Forms I-V) and its implementation in Form 4 English classrooms . Unpublished research project.
26.
Fu, G. (1975). A Hong Kong perspective: English language learning and Chinese students. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan.
27.
Fu, G. (1979). Bilingual education in Hong Kong: A historical perspective. Working papers in linguistics and language teaching , 1, 1-20.
28.
Gibbons, J. (1982). The issue of the language of instruction in the lower forms of Hong Kong secondary schools. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 3, 117-128.
29.
Hong Kong Blue Book. (1865). Annual report on the state of the Government schools in Hong Kong for the year 1865.
30.
Hong Kong Blue Book. (1867). Annual report on the state of the Government schools in Hong Kong for the year 1867.
31.
Hong Kong Hansard: Reports of the meetings of the Legislative Council session. (31 October, 1916).
32.
Hong Kong Standard. (1979, 10 October). Educator criticises English standards.
33.
Howatt, A. (1984). A history of English language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34.
Howatt, A. (1987). From structural to communicative. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 8, 14-29.
35.
Johnson, R. (1991). Teaching and learning in the English stream in secondary schools: Implications of ECR4. Hong KongInstitute of Language in Education Journal, 8, 10-24.
36.
Johnson, R. and Lee, P. (1987). Modes of instruction: Teaching strategies and student responses. Lord, R. and Cheng, H. (Eds.) Language education in Hong Kong, 99-122. Hong Kong:Chinese University Press.
37.
King, R. (1994). Historical survey of English language testing in Hong Kong. In Boyle, J. and Falvey, P. (Eds.) English language testing in Hong Kong, 3-25. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press .
38.
Lai, C. ( 1993). Communication failure in the language classroom: An exploration of causes. Research Report No.25, Department of English, City University of Hong Kong.
39.
Leung, F. (1987). The communicative approach in Hong Kong secondary schools: A survey of English language teachers' attitude. Educational Research Journal, 2, 95-100.
40.
Lin, A. ( 1990). Teaching in two tongues: Language alternation in foreign language classrooms. Research Report No.3, Department of English, City University of Hong Kong.
41.
Llewellyn, J. et al. (1982). A perspective on education in Hong Kong: Report by a visiting panel. Hong Kong: Government Printer .
42.
Long, M. and Porter, P. (1985). Group work, interlanguage talk, and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 207-228.
43.
Lord, R. (1974). English - How serious a problem for students in Hong Kong? The EnglishBulletin, 6, 1-10.
44.
Luke, K.K. and Richards, J. (1982). English in Hong Kong: Functions and status. English World-wide, 3, 47-64.
45.
Maclennan, C. (1988). An investigation of the criteria which a group of Hong Kong and Macau students of English list as those which make a good teacher. Hong KongInstitute of Language in Education Journal , 4, 61 - 74.
46.
McClellan, D. (1953). Foreword to the 'trial' issue. In Tingay, F. et al (Eds.) Hong Kong teachers on the teaching of English (p. 3). Hong Kong: Government Printer.
47.
McDonough, J. and Shaw, C. (1993). Materials and methods in ELT. Oxford: Blackwell.
48.
Morris, P. (1985). Teachers' perceptions of the barriers to the implementation of a pedagogic innovation: A south east Asian case study. International Review of Education, 31, 3-18.
49.
Morris, P. (1995). The Hong Kong school curriculum. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
50.
Morrow, K. (1981). Principles of communicative methodology. In Johnson, K. and Morrow, K. (Eds.). Communication in the classroom, 59- 66. Harlow: Longman.
51.
Nunan, D. (1987). Communicative language teaching: Making it work . ELT Journal, 41, 136-145.
52.
Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53.
Nunan, D. (1991). Communicative tasks and the language curriculum . TESOL Quarterly, 25, 279-295.
54.
Oxford, R., Lavine, R. and Crookall, D. (1989). Language learning strategies, the communicative approach, and their classroom implications. Foreign Language Annals, 22, 29-39.
55.
Pennington, M. (1995a). The teacher change cycle. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 705-731.
56.
Pennington, M. (1995b). Eight case studies of classroom discourse in the Hong Kong secondary English class. Research Report No. 42, Department of English, City University of Hong Kong .
57.
Pennington, M., Balla, J., Detaramani, C., Poon, A. and Tam, F. (1992). Towards a model of language choice among Hong Kong tertiary students: A preliminary analysis. Research Report No. 18, Department of English, City University of Hong Kong.
58.
Pica, T. (1987). Second language acquisition, social interaction, and the classroom. Applied Linguistics, 8, 3-21.
59.
Pica, T. and Doughty, C. (1985). The role of group work in classroom second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7, 233 - 248.
60.
Reynolds, P. (1974). English language teaching and textbooks in Hong Kong. Educational Studies and Research Papers No.3, University of Hong KongDepartment of Education Research Unit.
61.
Richards, J. (1984). The secret life of methods. TESOL Quarterly, 18, 7-23.
62.
Richards, J., Tung, P. and Ng, P. (1992). The culture of the English language teacher: A Hong Kong example. RELC Journal, 23, 81-102.
63.
Rossner, R. (1987). Materials for communicative language teaching and learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 8, 140-163.
64.
Shek, C., Johnson, R. and Law, E. (1991). Survey of the language policy and practice in 193 Hong Kong secondary schools. New Horizons, 32, 1-10.
65.
Sinclair, J. and Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
66.
So, D. (1992). Language-based bifurcation of secondary schools in Hong Kong. In Luke, K.K. (Ed.) Into the 21st century: Issues of language in education in Hong Kong, 69-95 . Hong Kong: Linguistic Society of Hong Kong.
67.
South China Morning Post. (1978, 10 October). A failure to communicate.
68.
Swaffar, J., Arens, K. and Morgan, M. (1982). Teacher classroom practices: Redefining method as task hierarchy. Modern Language Journal, 66, 24-33.
69.
Swan, M. (1985). A critical look at the communicative approach. Parts 1 & 2, ELT Journal, 39(1), 2-11; 39(2) 76-87.
70.
Tingay, F. (1953). Editorial in 'trial' issue. In Tingay, F. etal (Eds) Hong Kong teachers on the teaching of English (p. 5). Hong Kong: Government Printer .
71.
Tomlinson, B. (1988). Conflicts in TEFL: Reasons for failure in secondary schools. Hong KongInstitute of Language in Education Journal , 4, 103-110.
72.
Tsui, A. (1985). Analysing input and interaction in second language classrooms. RELC Journal, 16, 8-32.
73.
Whitly, M. (1993). Communicative language teaching: An incomplete revolution. Foreign Language Annals, 26, 137-154.
74.
Widdowson, H. (1972). The teaching of English as communication. ELT Journal, 27, 15-19.
Young, R. and Lee, S. (1987). EFL curriculum innovation and teachers' attitudes . In Lord, R. and Cheng, H. (Eds.) Language education in Hong Kong, 83-97. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
