Brinton, D. (1983). Student attitudes toward peer critique. Paper presented at CATESOL 1983 State Conference. Los Angeles.
2.
Chaudron, C. (1986). Writing for second language learners: Process and product. LLL Dean's Colloquium on Writing, University of Hawaii. Honolulu, April 23.
3.
Chaudron, C. (1984). The effects of feedback on students' composition revision, RELC Journal, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 1-14.
4.
Cohen, A. (1984a). Reformulating Compositions. TESOLNewsletter, Vol. 17, No. 6, p. 1.
5.
Cohen, A. (1984b). Reformulating second language compositions: Paper presented at Seventeenth Annual TESOL Convention, Toronto.
6.
Cramer, N. (1985). The writing process: Twenty projects for group work. Rowley, MA: Newbury House .
7.
Dunn-Rankin, P. (1983). Scaling methods. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8.
Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class?: The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univeristy Press.
9.
Gere. A. (1980). Written composition: Toward a theory of evaluation . College English, Vol, 42, No. 1, pp. 44-58.
10.
Gere, A. and R. Stevens. (1985). The language of writing groups: How oral response shapes revision. (In) The acquisition of writing, Sara Freedman , (Ed.), pp. 85-105. Norwood, NJ: Ablex .
11.
Langer, J. (1982). What students know and what they write. National Writing ProjectNewsletter, Vol. 4, No. 1.
12.
Langer, J. and A. Applebee (1984). Language, learning, and interaction: A framework for the improving of writing. (In) Contexts for learning to write, A. Applebee (Ed.), pp. 169-182. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
13.
Lasser-Rico, G. (1983). Writing the natural way. Boston : Houghton-Mifflin.
14.
McKay, S. (1981). Pre-writing activities. TECFORS Newsletter. Vol. 4, No. 3, p. 12.
15.
Newkirk, T. (1984a). How students read student papers: An exploratory study. Written Communication, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 283-305.
16.
Newkirk, T. (1984b). Direction and misdirection in peer response. College Communication and Composition, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 301-312.
17.
Norusis, M. (1983). SSPSx advanced statistics guide. Chicago: McGraw Hill.
18.
Partridge, K. (1981). A comparison of the effectiveness of peer vs. teacher evaluation for helping students of English as a second language to improve the quality of their written compositions. M.A. thesis. Honolulu: Department of English as a Second Language, University of Hawaii.
19.
Raimes, A. (1978). Focus on composition. NY: Oxford University Press.
20.
Raimes, A. (1983). Techniques in teaching writing. NY: Oxford University Press.
21.
Santos, T. (1986). Professors' reactions to the writing of nonnative students. Paper presented at the 21st Annual TESOL Conference. Anaheim, CA.
22.
Squire, J. (1964). The responses of adolescents while reading four short stories. Champagne, IL: NCTE .
23.
Taylor, B. (1981). Content and written form: A two-way street. TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 5-15.
24.
Zamel, V. (1982). Writing: The process of discovering meaning. TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 195-209.
25.
Zamel, V. (1983). The composing processes of advanced ESL students: Six case studies. TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 165-187.
26.
Zhang, S.Q. (1985). The differential effects of source of corrective feedback on ESL writing proficiency. M.A. thesis. Honolulu : Department of ESL, University of Hawaii.
27.
Zhang, S.Q. and P. Halpren. (1984). The effects of corrective feedback on the accuracy and discourse quality of ESL students' compositions. Unpublished paper. Honolulu: Department of ESL, University of Hawaii.