Current theories of language input, interaction and second language acquisition have claimed that the kind of language input that has been made available to the learners and the kind of interac tion that they have been involved in have important effects on the language acquired. It has been hypothesized that input which is com prehensible and interaction which has been modified best facilitate second language acquisition. Since the classroom is one of the few places where comprehensible input and modified interaction are made available, and since the teacher is an important source of in put, this paper suggests that it is essential for ESL teachers to analyze what actually has gone on in their own language classrooms. It pro poses a system for analyzing input and interaction in the classroom. This system is then applied to two English lessons in secondary schools in Hong Kong. The observations are discussed in the context of current theories of input, interaction and second language acquisi tion.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allwright, Richard.1980. 'Turns, Topics, and Tasks: Patterns of Participation in Language Learning and Teaching.' In Larsen-Freeman, D. (ed.), Discourse Analysis in Second Language Research , Newbury House Publishers, Inc.
2.
_. 1983. 'Classroom Centered Research on Language Teaching and Learning: A Historical Overview' TESOL Quarterly vol. 17, No. 2:191-204.
3.
Barnes, Douglas et al. 1971. Language, the learner and the school, revised edition, Penguin Papers in Education.
4.
Bellack et al. 1966. The Language of the Classroom, Teachers College Press.
5.
Chaudron, Craig.1983. 'Simplification of Input: Topic Reinstatements and their Effects on L2 Learners' Recognition and Recall' TESOL Quarterly vol. 17, No. 3:437-458.
6.
Flanders, Ned E.1970. Analyzing Teaching Behaviour, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
7.
Flanders, N.E. and Simon A.1970. 'Teaching effectiveness: a review of research 1960-66 ' R.L. Ebel (ed.) Encylopaedia of educational research, Chicago, Rand McNally.
8.
Gaies, Stephen.1977. 'The nature of linguistic input in formal second language learning: Linguistic and communicative strategies in ESL teachers' classroom language.' In H.D. Brown, C.A. Yorio and R.H. Crymes (eds.) On TESOL '77, Washington, D.C. : TESOL.
9.
_. 1983. 'The Investigation of Language Classroom Processes'TESOL Quarterly vol. 17 No. 2:205-218.
10.
Hatch, Evelyn M.1978a. 'Discourse Analysis and Second Language Acquisition '. In E.M. Hatch (ed.) Second Language Acquisition: a book ofreadings. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.
11.
. 1978b. 'Discourse analysis, speech acts, and second language acquisition.' In W. Ritchie (ed.) Second Language Acquisition Research, New York : Academic press.
12.
Hatch, E.M., T. Shapira and J. Gough.1978. 'Foreigner-talk discourse.' ITL Review of Applied Linguistics, 39-60.
13.
Krashen, Stephen D.1976a. 'Formal and informal linguistic environments in language learning and acquisition.' TESOL Quarterly10:157-168.
14.
_. 1977a. 'Some issues relating to the Monitor Model'. In H.D. Brown, C. Yorio and R. Crymes (eds.) On TESOL '77: Teaching and Learning English as a Second Language: Trends in Research and Practice. Washington: TESOL pp. 145-158.
15.
_. 1977b. 'The Monitor Model for adult second language performance '. In M. Burt, H. Dulay and M. Finocchiaro (eds.) Viewpoints on English as a Second Language: Trends in Research and Practice. New York: Regents p. 152-161.
16.
_. 1980. 'The input hypothesis.' In James E. Alatis (ed.) Current Issues in Bilingual Education . Georgetown University Round Table on Language and Linguistics , 1980.
17.
_. 1980b. 'The theoretical and practical relevance of simple codes in second language acquisition'. In R. Scarcella and S. Krashen (eds.) Research in Second Language Acquisition. Rowley, Mass. : Newbury House.
18.
_. 1981. Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning . Oxford: Pergamon Press.
19.
_. 1982. Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition . Oxford: Pergamon Press.
20.
Krashen, S. and Seliger, H.1975. 'The essential contribution of formal instruction in adult second language learning.' TESOL Quarterly9, 2:173-183.
21.
_. 1976. 'The role of formal and informal linguistic environments in adult second language learning.' International Journal of Psycholinguistics3:15-21.
22.
Krashen, S., Zelinski, S., Jones, C., and Usprich, C.1978. 'How important is instruction?' ELT Journal32, 3:257-261.
23.
Larsen-Freeman, Diane.1975b. 'The acquisition of grammatical morphemes by adult ESL learners.' TESOL Quarterly9, 4:409-419.
24.
_. 1976a. 'An explanation for the morpheme accuracy order of learners of English as a second language.' Language Learning26, 1:125-135.
25.
. 1979. 'The importance of input in second language acquisition .' Paper presented at the Winter Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, UCLA, Los Angeles, December 1979.
26.
Long, Michael H.1980. 'Inside the "Black Box": Methodological Issues in Classroom Research on Language Learning' Language Learning vol. 30, 1:1-42.
27.
_. 1981a. 'Input, interaction, and second language acquisition .' Paper presented at the New York Academy of Sciences Conference on Native Language and Foreign Language Acquisition, New York, January 15-16, 1981.
28.
_. 1981b. 'Questions in foreigner talk discourse.' Language Learning, 31, 1:135-157.
29.
_. 1981. 'Variation in linguistic input for second language acquisition '. Paper presented at the European-North American Workshop on Cross-Linguistic Second Language Acquisition Research, Lake Arrowhead, C. Sept. 7-14. To appear in the Workshop Proceedings . P.M. Andersen (ed.). Mass.: Newbury House.
30.
_. 1983. 'Does Second Language Instruction Make a Difference ? — A Review of Research.' TESOL Quarterly, vol. 17, 3:359-382.
31.
Long, M.H. and Sato, C. In press. 'Classroom foreigner talk discourse: forms and functions of teachers' questions.' In Classroom oriented research in language learning, H.W. Seliger and M.H. Long (eds.). Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.
32.
Maley, Alan.1980. 'Teaching for communicative competence: Reality and illusion .' Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 3, 1:10-16.
33.
Ober, R.L., Bentley and Miller.1971. Systematic Observation of Teaching — an interaction analysis, instructional strategy approach , Englewood Cliffs, N.J.Prentice Hall.
34.
Rosenshine, B.1968. 'Teaching behaviour related to pupil achievement ', paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council for Social Studies, Washington D.C.
35.
Scarcella, R.C. and Higa, C.1981. 'Input, negotiation and age differences in second language acquisition.' Language Learning, 31, 2:409-434.
36.
Scarcella, R.C., and Krashen, S. (eds.) 1980. Research in Second Language Acquisition. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.
37.
Seliger, Herbert.1977. 'Does practice make perfect? A study of interaction pattern and L2 competence.' Language Learning, 27, 2:263-278.
38.
Seliger, H. and Long, M.H. (eds.) In press. Classroom Language Acquisition and Use: New Perspectives. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
39.
Sinclair, J.M. and Coulthard, M.1975. Towards a Discourse Analysis — the English used by teachers and pupils. London, O.U.P.
40.
Sinclair, J.M. and Brazil, D.1982. Teacher Talk. Oxford University Press .
41.
Taylor, Barry P.1982. 'In Search of Real Reality.' TESOL Quarterly , vol. 16, 1:29-42.
42.
Tucker, G. Richard.1977. 'Can a second language be taught?' In H.D. Brown, C.A. Yorio, and R.H. Crymes (eds.), On TESOL '77Washington D.C.: TESOL.
43.
Wagner-Gough, J. and Hatch E.1975. 'The importance of input data in second language acquisition studies.' Language Learning, 25:297-308.
