There are very few available studies on the qualitative des cription of the oral reading behaviour of second language learners of English particularly in Southeast Asia. In this study the investigator attempted to apply Goodman's miscue analysis in describing the oral reading performance in English of selected Filipino fourth grade pupils. The findings reveal that although the Subjects (Ss) have limited background in English, they seem to process the printed page in the same way as the native speakers of English do.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allen, P David.1976. Some general implications concerning specific taxonomy categories. Findings of research in miscue analysis: classroom implications , ed. by P D Allen and D J Watson.Illinois: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills.
2.
Barrera, Rosalinda.1981. Reading in Spanish: insights from children's miscues. Learning to read in different languages (Linguistic and literacy series 1) , ed. by Sarah Hudelson, Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.
3.
Beebe, Mona J.1976. Case studies of grade level effects on children's miscues and reading comprehension. Canadian Journal of Education1:2.
4.
Beebe, Mona J.1980. The effects of different types of substitution miscues on reading. Reading Research Quarterly15:3.
5.
Burke, Carolyn L.1976. The three cue systems. Findings of research in miscue analysis: classroom implications, ed. by P D Allen and D J Watson.Illinois: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills.
6.
Clarke, Mark A.1981. Reading in Spanish and English evidence from adult ESL students. Learning to read in different language (Linguistic and Literacy Series 1), ed. by Sarah Hudelson, Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics .
7.
Cohen, Alice.1969. Relationship between factor of dominance and reading ability. Reading disability and perception, ed. by George D. Spaches, Newark, Delaware: IRA.
8.
Devine, Joanne.1981. Developmental patterns in native and non-native reading acquisition. Learning to read in different language (Linguistics and literacy series 1), ed. by Sarah Hudelson , Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.
9.
Epie Institute.1974. Selecting and evaluating beginning reading materials (a how to handbook). EPIE Educational Report No 62/63New York: The Institute.
10.
Goodman, K.S.1969. Reading: a psycholinguistic guessing game. Journal of the Reading Specialist6.
11.
Goodman, K.S. and Burkes, C.L.1968. Study of children's behaviour while reading orally . Washington, D.C.: ERIC CRIER/ Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
12.
Goodman, K.S.1969. Analysis of oral reading miscue: applied psycholinguistics . Reading Research Quarterly5:1.
13.
Goodman, K.S.1976. Miscue analysis: theory and reality in reading. New horizons in reading, ed. by John E Meritt.Newark, Delaware: IRA.
14.
Goodman, K.S.1976. The Goodmans taxonomy of oral reading miscues. Findings of research in miscue analysis: classroom implications, ed. by P D Allen and D J Watson.Illinois: ERIC clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills.
15.
Goodman, Y.M.1971. Lingitudinal study of children's oral reading behaviour . Washington, D C: ERIC GRIER/Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
16.
Goodman, Y.M. and Burke, C.L.1972. Reading miscue inventory. New York : Macmillan.
17.
Goodman, Y.M.1976. Developing reading proficiency. Findings of research in miscue analysis: classroom implications, ed. by P D Allen and D J Watson, Illinois: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills.
18.
Hatch, Evelyn.1973. Research on reading a second language. VCLA workpapers in teaching English as a second language.
19.
Hudelson, Sarah.1981. An investigation of the oral reading behaviour of native Spanish speakers, reading in Spanish. Learning to read in different languages (Linguistics and literacy series 1), ed. by Sarah Hudelson.Washington, D C: Center for Applied Linguistics.
20.
Hughes, John W.1973. Reading and reading failures. London : Evans Brother Ltd.
21.
Liu, Stella S F1980. Reading diagnosis in the classroom. Disabled readers: insight, assessment, instruction, ed. by Diane J Sawyer. Newwark, Delaware: IRA.
22.
Marntellock, Helen A.1976. Correction. Findings of research in miscue analysis: classroom implications, ed. by P D Allen and D J Watson.Illinois: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills.
23.
Menosky, Dorothy M.1976. The three cue systems. Findings of research in miscue analysis: classroom implications, ed. by P D Allen and D J Watson.Illinois: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills.
24.
Montoro, Catherine Buck.1976. Syntactic acceptability, synatactic change and transformations. Findings of research in miscue analysis: classroom implications , ed. by P D Allen and D J Watson.Illinois: ERIC clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills.
25.
Page, William D.1976Semantic acceptability and semantic change. Findings of research in miscue analysis: classroom implications, ed. by P D Allen and D J Watson.Illinois: ERIC clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills.
26.
Robinet, B.1976. Reading English as a second language. Papers in ESL: selected papers from the association of TESL, ed. by J Morley.Washington, D C: NAFSA.
27.
Rousch, Peter D.1976. Semantic and relationships. Findings of research in miscue analysis: classroom implications, ed. by P D Allen and D J Watson.Illinois: ERIC clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills. Smith, Frank.1978. Reading. Cambridge: CUP.
28.
Smith, Laura & Lindberg, Margaret.1973. Building instructional materials, miscue analysis: applications to reading instruction, ed. by K S Goodman.Illinois: Eric Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills.
29.
Smith Laura A.1976. Miscue research and readability. Findings of research in miscue analysis: classroom implications, ed. by P D Allen and D J Watson.Illinois: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills.
30.
Weaver, Constance.1980. Psycholinguistics andreading. Mass : Winthrop Publishers, Inc.
31.
Weber, RM1970. A linguistic analysis of first grade reading errors . Reading Research Quarterly5.
