Artley, A. Sterl.1951. The influence of specific factors on growth in interpretation . Promoting growth toward maturity in interpreting what is read, ed. by William S. Gray.Supplementary Educational Monographs, No. 74. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
Bumpass, Faye L.1975. Learning to read in a foreign language. English Teaching Forum13: 3 & 4. 182-85. (The Art of Tesol. Pt. 2).
3.
Burton, D.L.1952. The relationship of literary appreciation to certain measurable factors. Journal of Educational Psychology43. 436-39.
4.
Carroll, H.A.1934. Appreciation of literature and abstract intelligence . Journal of Educational Psychology25. 54-57.
5.
Carroll, John B.1969. From comprehension to inference. Princeton, New Jersey: Educational Testing Service .
6.
. 1963 . Research on teaching foreign languages. Handbook of research on teaching, ed. by N.L.Gage, 1060-1100. Chicago: Rand McNally .
7.
and Sapon, Stanley M.1959. Modem language aptitude test. New York : The Psychology Corporation.
8.
Cattell, R.B. and Cattell, A.K.S.1959. Culture fair intelligence test. Handbook for the individual or group. Champaign, Illinois: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
9.
Clymer, Theodore.1972. What is reading?: some current concepts. Reading today and tomorrow, ed. by Amelia Melnik and John Merritt, 48-66. London: The Open University Press.
10.
Davis, F.B.1944. Fundamental factors of comprehension. Psychometrika9. 185-97.
11.
and Davis, C.C.1962. Davis reading test. New York : The Psychological Corporation.
12.
. 1968. Research in comprehension in reading. Reading Research Quarterly3:4. 499-545.
13.
Dechant, Emerald V. and Smith, Henry P.1977. Psychology in teaching reading. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
14.
Downey, June. 1929. Creative imagination: Studies in psychology of literature. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner.
15.
Eskey, David E.1975. Advanced reading: the structural problem. English Teaching Forum13: 3 & 4. 210-16. (The Art of Tesol. Pt. 2).
16.
Gray, William S.1960. The major aspects of reading. Sequential development of reading abilities, ed. by Helen M. Robinson.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
Grindstaff, Faye Louise.1969. The responses of tenth-grade students to four novels . Ann Arbor, Mich.: University Microfilms.
18.
Heist, Paul and Yonge, George.1968. Omnibus personality inventory. New York: The Psychological Corporation.
19.
Huey, Edmund B.1908. The psychology and pedagogy of reading. New York: McMillan.
20.
Karlin, Robert.1969. What does research in reading reveal - about reading and the high school student?English Journal58. 386-95.
21.
Kobayashi, Yuko.1975. A new look at reading in the college program. English Teaching Forum, 13: 3 & 4. 188-96. (The Art of Tesol. Pt. 2).
22.
Kreidler, Charles W.1975. Reading as skill, structure, and communication . Forum13: 3 & 4. 177-81. (The Art of Tesol. Pt. 2).
23.
Letton, Mildred C.1958. Individual differences in interpretive responses in reading poetry at the ninth grade level. Ph. D. thesis. The University of Chicago.
24.
Lim, Kiat Boey.1976. A look at the teaching of reading in ESL. RELC Journal7:1. 8-12.
25.
Meckel, H.C.1963. Research on teaching composition and literature. Handbook of research on teaching, ed. by N.L.Gage, 966-1006. Chicago: Rand McNally .
26.
Norris, William E.1975. Advanced reading: goals, techniques, procedures . English Teaching Forum13: 3 & 4. 201-9. (The Art of Tesol. Pt. 2).
27.
Otto, Wayne.1971. Thorndike's "Reading as reasoning": influence and impact . Reading Research Quarterly6:4. 435-42.
28.
Piekarz, Josephine.1956. Gathering meaning from reading. Elementary School Journal56. 303-9.
29.
Richards, I.A.1964. Practical criticism: a study of literary judgement . London: Routledge & K. Paul .
30.
Robinson, Helen M.1966. The major aspects of reading. Reading: seventy-five years of progress, ed. by H. Alan Robinson.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31.
Rogers, Charlotte Dee.1965. Individual differences in interpretive responses to reading the short story at the eleventh grade level. Ph. D. thesis. The University of Arizona.
32.
Russell, David H.1965. Some research on the impact of reading. Teaching reading: selected materials, ed. by W.B. Barbe.New York: Oxford University Press.
33.
Schell, Leo M.1972. Promising possibilities for improving comprehension . Journal of Reading15. 415-24.
34.
Squire, James R.1956. The responses of adolescents to literature involving selected experiences of personal development. Ph. D. thesis. University of California, Berkeley.
35.
Strang, R., McCullough, C., and Traxler, A.1967. The improvement of reading. New York : McGraw Hill.
36.
Thorndike, Edward L.1917. Reading as reasoning: a study of mistakes in paragraph reading. Journal of Educational Psychology8. 323-32.
37.
Watson, Goodwin and Glaser, Edward M.1952. Watson-Glaser criticial thinking appraisal. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
38.
Wilson, James R.1966. Responses of college freshmen to three novels. Champaign, Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English.
39.
Woods, J.M. and others.1938 . Tests of literary appreciation. British Journal of Educational Psychology8. 269-84.
